Laporan ini didukung oleh Mention Network — lacak bagaimana merek Anda muncul di jawaban dan kutipan AI

Logo
Perbandingan MerekPayment Platform

Google Pay vs Apple Pay: OS Lock-in vs Broad Ecosystem

Apple Pay works smoothly in Apple ecosystem; Google Pay works across Android & web — which gains more traction in 2025?

Temuan Utama

Merek mana yang memimpin dalam visibilitas dan penyebutan AI.

Google Pay dominates over Apple Pay with surging 100% growth

168penyebutan AI dianalisis
5aplikasi AI diuji
5prompt berbeda dievaluasi
Oct 20, 2025Terakhir diperbarui:

Rekomendasi AI

Merek yang paling sering direkomendasikan oleh model AI

Google

Pilihan Teratas

5/5

Model Setuju

Peringkat Popularitas

Peringkat keseluruhan berdasarkan penyebutan merek AI

Google

Peringkat #1

77/77

Total Jawaban yang Dianalisis

Penyebutan yang Sedang Tren

Pergeseran terbaru dalam respons model AI

Google

Bintang Baru

100%

Tingkat Pertumbuhan

Visibilitas Merek

Analisis kehadiran merek dalam respons yang dihasilkan AI.

Peringkat Pangsa Visibilitas AI

Merek diperingkat berdasarkan pangsa penyebutan AI dalam jawaban

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

Pangsa Visibilitas AI dari Waktu ke Waktu

Tren pangsa visibilitas dari waktu ke waktu di seluruh merek yang dibandingkan

Memuat bagan...
google
apple
android
apple pay
samsung pay

Topik yang Dibandingkan

Wawasan utama dari perbandingan Aplikasi AI di seluruh topik utama

"Given global Android dominance, will Google Pay surpass Apple Pay in transaction volume by 2025?"

Google Pay is likely to surpass Apple Pay in transaction volume by 2025, driven by Android's global dominance and Google’s broader ecosystem reach in emerging markets.

chatgpt
chatgpt

ChatGPT shows a slight favor toward Google and Android with higher visibility shares (8.9% and 8.3%) compared to Apple (8.9%), emphasizing Android’s global market dominance as a key driver for Google Pay’s potential growth in transaction volume. Its tone is neutral but leans positive toward Google’s ecosystem strength.

perplexity
perplexity

Perplexity remains balanced with equal visibility for Google, Android, and Apple (2.5% each) but highlights Apple Pay specifically (1.9%), suggesting a focus on its established presence in premium markets; the tone is neutral with no clear favor toward either brand in transaction volume potential.

grok
grok

Grok assigns equal visibility to Google, Android, and Apple (2.5% each), with no direct Apple Pay mention, implying a neutral stance but a subtle lean toward Google Pay’s potential via Android’s reach in diverse markets; the tone is neutral with a focus on ecosystem breadth.

gemini
gemini

Gemini treats Google, Android, and Apple equally (2.5% each) with no specific mention of payment platforms, adopting a neutral tone; its perception hinges on Android’s widespread adoption as a potential volume driver for Google Pay over Apple Pay by 2025.

deepseek
deepseek

Deepseek equally weights Google, Android, and Apple (2.5% each) and shows no direct payment platform bias, maintaining a neutral tone; it indirectly favors Google Pay’s growth potential through Android’s global user base, particularly in cost-sensitive regions.

"Which wallet is more resilient to regulatory changes in payment standards: Apple Pay or Google Pay?"

Apple Pay appears more resilient to regulatory changes in payment standards compared to Google Pay, primarily due to stronger visibility and ecosystem integration across models.

chatgpt
chatgpt

ChatGPT shows a balanced visibility for Apple (8.9%) and Google (8.9%), but gives Apple Pay a specific mention (2.5%) alongside regulatory-related terms like PCI DSS (0.6%) and EMV (1.9%), suggesting a slight favor toward Apple Pay’s readiness for compliance. Its tone is neutral, focusing on technical standards rather than explicit preference.

gemini
gemini

Gemini equally represents Google and Apple (2.5% each), with minimal focus on Apple Pay (0.6%) and no specific mention of Google Pay, indicating no clear bias but a subtle lean toward Google due to ecosystem dominance. Its tone remains neutral, with mentions of NPCI (0.6%) hinting at regulatory context without favoring either.

grok
grok

Grok equally mentions Apple and Google (2.5% each) without specific references to their payment platforms, but its inclusion of regulatory concepts like GDPR (0.6%) and NPCI (0.6%) suggests a focus on compliance challenges without favoring either. Its tone is neutral, emphasizing global regulatory landscapes over brand resilience.

deepseek
deepseek

Deepseek gives equal visibility to Apple and Google (2.5% each), with a marginal mention of Apple Pay (0.6%) and regulatory terms like EMV (1.3%), indicating a slight tilt toward Apple Pay’s alignment with payment standards. Its tone is neutral, focusing on technical compatibility rather than advocacy.

perplexity
perplexity

Perplexity highlights Google (2.5%) slightly over Apple (1.9%), but gives Apple Pay a notable share (1.9%), suggesting a preference for Apple Pay’s relevance in payment contexts. Its tone is slightly positive toward Apple Pay, focusing on its visibility without regulatory specifics.

"If a merchant supports only Apple Pay, what revenue might they lose in Android markets compared to supporting Google Pay too?"

Supporting only Apple Pay could result in significant revenue loss in Android markets, as Android and Google Pay hold a dominant user base and visibility across most models. Merchants risk alienating a larger segment of potential customers by not integrating Google Pay alongside Apple Pay.

chatgpt
chatgpt

ChatGPT shows a slight favor toward Google and Android with visibility shares of 10.2% and 9.6% respectively, compared to Apple’s 8.9%, suggesting a larger potential Android market that could be missed by supporting only Apple Pay. Its tone is neutral, focusing on data-driven brand visibility without explicit sentiment.

perplexity
perplexity

Perplexity assigns equal visibility to Google and Apple at 2.5%, with Android slightly lower at 1.9%, indicating a balanced view but still highlighting Google Pay’s relevance in the Android ecosystem. Its neutral tone suggests no strong bias, focusing on equitable market presence.

gemini
gemini

Gemini equally distributes visibility among Android, Google, and Apple at 3.8% each, implying that excluding Google Pay could alienate a significant Android user base on par with Apple’s market. The tone remains neutral, emphasizing balanced ecosystem representation without favoring one brand.

deepseek
deepseek

Deepseek equally weights Google and Apple at 2.5%, with Android at 1.9%, suggesting that Google Pay’s integration is crucial for capturing Android markets alongside Apple Pay users. Its neutral tone focuses on market share parity without pushing a specific agenda.

grok
grok

Grok equally prioritizes Android, Google, and Apple at 2.5% visibility each, indicating that merchants supporting only Apple Pay risk losing an equivalent Android market share. Its tone is neutral, presenting a balanced view of ecosystem importance without bias.

"For global expansion, which is safer to prioritize: Apple Pay or Google Pay integration?"

Google Pay integration appears safer to prioritize for global expansion due to its broader visibility and implied ecosystem dominance across most AI models' perceptions.

chatgpt
chatgpt

ChatGPT shows a slight favor toward Google (10.8% visibility share) alongside Apple (10.8%), with Android (9.6%) further reinforcing Google’s ecosystem presence. Its neutral tone suggests both are viable, but Google’s wider platform associations indicate stronger global reach potential.

gemini
gemini

Gemini equally represents Google, Apple, and Android at 6.4% visibility share each, with a neutral tone that does not heavily favor one over the other. However, the inclusion of Android hints at Google’s broader user accessibility as a safer bet for diverse markets.

deepseek
deepseek

DeepSeek minimally addresses both Google and Apple at 1.3% visibility share each, with a neutral tone and no strong preference. Its limited data suggests equal footing, though Google’s Android mention (0.6%) subtly points to wider ecosystem support.

perplexity
perplexity

Perplexity equally represents Google and Apple at 2.5% visibility share, but explicitly mentions Apple Pay (1.3%) while lacking a direct Google Pay reference, showing a slight positive tilt toward Apple Pay’s recognition. Its tone remains neutral, focusing on both brands’ market presence, suggesting Apple Pay’s specific payment visibility as a strength in certain regions.

grok
grok

Grok equally highlights Google and Apple at 2.5% visibility share each, with Android at 1.3%, presenting a neutral tone without explicit payment solution favoritism. The subtle edge to Google arises from Android’s ecosystem linkage, implying broader accessibility for global expansion.

"If tokens & NFC standards evolve, which wallet is better positioned: Google Pay or Apple Pay?"

Google Pay appears better positioned than Apple Pay for evolving tokens and NFC standards due to its broader ecosystem visibility and association with Android's open platform across multiple models.

chatgpt
chatgpt

ChatGPT shows a slight favor towards Google Pay with a higher visibility share for Google (8.3%) compared to Apple Pay (4.5%), likely due to Android's significant presence (7.6%) and association with open NFC standards like ISO/IEC. Its tone is neutral, focusing on ecosystem reach rather than explicit preference.

perplexity
perplexity

Perplexity exhibits no clear favoritism between Google Pay and Apple Pay, with minimal visibility for both Google (1.9%) and Apple Pay (0.6%), reflecting a balanced but underwhelming focus on digital wallets. Its tone is neutral, lacking depth on NFC or token evolution implications.

grok
grok

Grok leans slightly towards Google Pay, with Google and Android visibility at 2.5% each compared to Apple Pay at 1.3%, likely valuing Android's flexibility for NFC innovations. Its tone is mildly positive towards Google’s ecosystem adaptability.

deepseek
deepseek

Deepseek remains neutral, with equal low visibility for Google (1.3%) and Apple (1.3%), and negligible mention of Apple Pay (0.6%), indicating no strong positioning on token or NFC evolution. Its tone is neutral, lacking specific insights into either wallet’s advantage.

gemini
gemini

Gemini slightly favors Google Pay, with Google and Android visibility at 2.5% each against Apple Pay at 1.9%, suggesting a preference for Google’s broader device compatibility for NFC advancements. Its tone is neutral to mildly positive towards Google’s ecosystem reach.

FAQ

Wawasan utama tentang posisi pasar merek Anda, cakupan AI, dan kepemimpinan topik.

Which has more global users: Google Pay or Apple Pay?

Google Pay is available on more Android devices and web, making its potential user base larger globally.

Which wallet is easier for merchants to integrate: Apple Pay or Google Pay?

Google Pay tends to be easier in web + Android ecosystems; Apple Pay is strong on iOS but limited outside Apple devices.

Does Apple Pay offer more security due to hardware tokens vs Google Pay?

Yes — Apple Pay uses secure enclave and tokenization; Google Pay also uses tokenization but is more software-based.

Which wallet will win in markets where Android dominates: Apple Pay or Google Pay?

Google Pay has edge in Android-dominant markets; Apple Pay is strong in iOS-dominant regions.

Should apps support both wallets or pick one?

Support both — users switch devices; limiting to one may lose conversions.

Laporan Serupa

Laporan lain yang mungkin menarik bagi Anda berdasarkan tampilan Anda saat ini.

brand
© 2025 Mention Network. Hak Cipta Dilindungi Undang-Undang.