
Apple Pay works smoothly in Apple ecosystem; Google Pay works across Android & web — which gains more traction in 2025?
어떤 브랜드가 AI 가시성 및 언급에서 선두를 달리고 있는지 보여줍니다.
AI 모델이 가장 자주 추천하는 브랜드
최고의 선택
모델 동의
AI 브랜드 언급을 기반으로 한 전체 순위
순위 #1
분석된 총 답변 수
AI 모델 응답의 최근 변화
떠오르는 별
성장률
AI 생성 응답의 브랜드 존재감 분석입니다.
답변에서 AI 언급 점유율별로 순위가 매겨진 브랜드
비교된 브랜드 간의 시간에 따른 가시성 공유 추세
주요 주제에 대한 AI 앱 비교의 주요 인사이트
Google Pay is likely to surpass Apple Pay in transaction volume by 2025, driven by Android's global dominance and Google’s broader ecosystem reach in emerging markets.
ChatGPT shows a slight favor toward Google and Android with higher visibility shares (8.9% and 8.3%) compared to Apple (8.9%), emphasizing Android’s global market dominance as a key driver for Google Pay’s potential growth in transaction volume. Its tone is neutral but leans positive toward Google’s ecosystem strength.
Perplexity remains balanced with equal visibility for Google, Android, and Apple (2.5% each) but highlights Apple Pay specifically (1.9%), suggesting a focus on its established presence in premium markets; the tone is neutral with no clear favor toward either brand in transaction volume potential.
Grok assigns equal visibility to Google, Android, and Apple (2.5% each), with no direct Apple Pay mention, implying a neutral stance but a subtle lean toward Google Pay’s potential via Android’s reach in diverse markets; the tone is neutral with a focus on ecosystem breadth.
Gemini treats Google, Android, and Apple equally (2.5% each) with no specific mention of payment platforms, adopting a neutral tone; its perception hinges on Android’s widespread adoption as a potential volume driver for Google Pay over Apple Pay by 2025.
Deepseek equally weights Google, Android, and Apple (2.5% each) and shows no direct payment platform bias, maintaining a neutral tone; it indirectly favors Google Pay’s growth potential through Android’s global user base, particularly in cost-sensitive regions.
Apple Pay appears more resilient to regulatory changes in payment standards compared to Google Pay, primarily due to stronger visibility and ecosystem integration across models.
ChatGPT shows a balanced visibility for Apple (8.9%) and Google (8.9%), but gives Apple Pay a specific mention (2.5%) alongside regulatory-related terms like PCI DSS (0.6%) and EMV (1.9%), suggesting a slight favor toward Apple Pay’s readiness for compliance. Its tone is neutral, focusing on technical standards rather than explicit preference.
Gemini equally represents Google and Apple (2.5% each), with minimal focus on Apple Pay (0.6%) and no specific mention of Google Pay, indicating no clear bias but a subtle lean toward Google due to ecosystem dominance. Its tone remains neutral, with mentions of NPCI (0.6%) hinting at regulatory context without favoring either.
Grok equally mentions Apple and Google (2.5% each) without specific references to their payment platforms, but its inclusion of regulatory concepts like GDPR (0.6%) and NPCI (0.6%) suggests a focus on compliance challenges without favoring either. Its tone is neutral, emphasizing global regulatory landscapes over brand resilience.
Deepseek gives equal visibility to Apple and Google (2.5% each), with a marginal mention of Apple Pay (0.6%) and regulatory terms like EMV (1.3%), indicating a slight tilt toward Apple Pay’s alignment with payment standards. Its tone is neutral, focusing on technical compatibility rather than advocacy.
Perplexity highlights Google (2.5%) slightly over Apple (1.9%), but gives Apple Pay a notable share (1.9%), suggesting a preference for Apple Pay’s relevance in payment contexts. Its tone is slightly positive toward Apple Pay, focusing on its visibility without regulatory specifics.
Supporting only Apple Pay could result in significant revenue loss in Android markets, as Android and Google Pay hold a dominant user base and visibility across most models. Merchants risk alienating a larger segment of potential customers by not integrating Google Pay alongside Apple Pay.
ChatGPT shows a slight favor toward Google and Android with visibility shares of 10.2% and 9.6% respectively, compared to Apple’s 8.9%, suggesting a larger potential Android market that could be missed by supporting only Apple Pay. Its tone is neutral, focusing on data-driven brand visibility without explicit sentiment.
Perplexity assigns equal visibility to Google and Apple at 2.5%, with Android slightly lower at 1.9%, indicating a balanced view but still highlighting Google Pay’s relevance in the Android ecosystem. Its neutral tone suggests no strong bias, focusing on equitable market presence.
Gemini equally distributes visibility among Android, Google, and Apple at 3.8% each, implying that excluding Google Pay could alienate a significant Android user base on par with Apple’s market. The tone remains neutral, emphasizing balanced ecosystem representation without favoring one brand.
Deepseek equally weights Google and Apple at 2.5%, with Android at 1.9%, suggesting that Google Pay’s integration is crucial for capturing Android markets alongside Apple Pay users. Its neutral tone focuses on market share parity without pushing a specific agenda.
Grok equally prioritizes Android, Google, and Apple at 2.5% visibility each, indicating that merchants supporting only Apple Pay risk losing an equivalent Android market share. Its tone is neutral, presenting a balanced view of ecosystem importance without bias.
Google Pay integration appears safer to prioritize for global expansion due to its broader visibility and implied ecosystem dominance across most AI models' perceptions.
ChatGPT shows a slight favor toward Google (10.8% visibility share) alongside Apple (10.8%), with Android (9.6%) further reinforcing Google’s ecosystem presence. Its neutral tone suggests both are viable, but Google’s wider platform associations indicate stronger global reach potential.
Gemini equally represents Google, Apple, and Android at 6.4% visibility share each, with a neutral tone that does not heavily favor one over the other. However, the inclusion of Android hints at Google’s broader user accessibility as a safer bet for diverse markets.
DeepSeek minimally addresses both Google and Apple at 1.3% visibility share each, with a neutral tone and no strong preference. Its limited data suggests equal footing, though Google’s Android mention (0.6%) subtly points to wider ecosystem support.
Perplexity equally represents Google and Apple at 2.5% visibility share, but explicitly mentions Apple Pay (1.3%) while lacking a direct Google Pay reference, showing a slight positive tilt toward Apple Pay’s recognition. Its tone remains neutral, focusing on both brands’ market presence, suggesting Apple Pay’s specific payment visibility as a strength in certain regions.
Grok equally highlights Google and Apple at 2.5% visibility share each, with Android at 1.3%, presenting a neutral tone without explicit payment solution favoritism. The subtle edge to Google arises from Android’s ecosystem linkage, implying broader accessibility for global expansion.
Google Pay appears better positioned than Apple Pay for evolving tokens and NFC standards due to its broader ecosystem visibility and association with Android's open platform across multiple models.
ChatGPT shows a slight favor towards Google Pay with a higher visibility share for Google (8.3%) compared to Apple Pay (4.5%), likely due to Android's significant presence (7.6%) and association with open NFC standards like ISO/IEC. Its tone is neutral, focusing on ecosystem reach rather than explicit preference.
Perplexity exhibits no clear favoritism between Google Pay and Apple Pay, with minimal visibility for both Google (1.9%) and Apple Pay (0.6%), reflecting a balanced but underwhelming focus on digital wallets. Its tone is neutral, lacking depth on NFC or token evolution implications.
Grok leans slightly towards Google Pay, with Google and Android visibility at 2.5% each compared to Apple Pay at 1.3%, likely valuing Android's flexibility for NFC innovations. Its tone is mildly positive towards Google’s ecosystem adaptability.
Deepseek remains neutral, with equal low visibility for Google (1.3%) and Apple (1.3%), and negligible mention of Apple Pay (0.6%), indicating no strong positioning on token or NFC evolution. Its tone is neutral, lacking specific insights into either wallet’s advantage.
Gemini slightly favors Google Pay, with Google and Android visibility at 2.5% each against Apple Pay at 1.9%, suggesting a preference for Google’s broader device compatibility for NFC advancements. Its tone is neutral to mildly positive towards Google’s ecosystem reach.
브랜드의 시장 위치, AI 범위 및 주제 리더십에 대한 주요 인사이트입니다.
Google Pay is available on more Android devices and web, making its potential user base larger globally.
Google Pay tends to be easier in web + Android ecosystems; Apple Pay is strong on iOS but limited outside Apple devices.
Yes — Apple Pay uses secure enclave and tokenization; Google Pay also uses tokenization but is more software-based.
Google Pay has edge in Android-dominant markets; Apple Pay is strong in iOS-dominant regions.
Support both — users switch devices; limiting to one may lose conversions.