WGA vs AI Screenwriting: Automation Threat or Collaboration?

Grok slightly favors WGA with a visibility share of 2.7% compared to AI-related entities like ChatGPT and Midjourney at 1.3% each, suggesting a lean towards traditional guild structures for rights protection. Its tone is neutral, focusing on visibility without explicit critique or endorsement of either system for residual rights.

Gemini shows a balanced view but slightly tilts towards WGA with a 2.7% visibility share, equal to ChatGPT, indicating no strong preference but recognizing WGA's relevance in rights discussions. The tone is neutral, reflecting an analytical stance without deep sentiment on residual rights preservation.

ChatGPT strongly favors WGA with a significant 10.7% visibility share against ChatGPT’s own 5.3%, implying a preference for established human-centric guilds in protecting residual rights over AI systems. Its tone is positive towards WGA, likely due to the guild’s historical role in creator advocacy.

Deepseek leans towards WGA with a 4% visibility share compared to ChatGPT’s 2.7%, suggesting a preference for institutional mechanisms in safeguarding residual rights. The tone is neutral to slightly positive for WGA, focusing on its structural advantages over AI production models.

Perplexity marginally favors WGA with a 2.7% visibility share over ChatGPT’s 1.3%, indicating a slight inclination towards traditional systems for rights protection. Its tone remains neutral, presenting data without strong emotional or critical bias on residual rights.

Deepseek shows a slight favor toward WGA with a visibility share of 2.7% compared to ChatGPT's 1.3%, suggesting a perception of WGA as more relevant to writer credit protection, likely due to its historical role in safeguarding writer rights. The sentiment tone is neutral, focusing on visibility without explicit critique.

Gemini presents an equal visibility share of 2.7% for both WGA and ChatGPT, indicating no clear preference for either in protecting writer credit. The tone is neutral, reflecting a balanced view without strong advocacy for institutional or AI-driven policies.

ChatGPT strongly favors WGA with a visibility share of 9.3% compared to its own 4%, implying a recognition of WGA's superior role in protecting writer credit through structured agreements over emerging AI policies. The sentiment tone is positive toward WGA, emphasizing its prominence in this context.

Perplexity assigns equal visibility of 2.7% to both WGA and ChatGPT, suggesting no discernible preference in the context of writer credit protection. The tone remains neutral, indicating a lack of bias toward institutional or technological solutions.

Grok includes WGA at 2.7% visibility alongside AMPTP and other entertainment entities, with ChatGPT at a lower 1.3%, subtly favoring WGA as a key player in writer credit discussions due to its institutional authority. The tone is neutral to slightly positive toward WGA, reflecting its broader ecosystem relevance.

ChatGPT shows equal visibility for AMPTP and WGA at 9.3% each, suggesting no clear favoritism, though its neutral tone implies a balanced view on their roles in ethical AI co-writing frameworks. The model does not explicitly lean toward either but highlights both as equally relevant in the conversation.

Gemini favors WGA slightly with a visibility share of 2.7% compared to AMPTP’s 1.3%, indicating a perception that WGA might be more aligned with ethical considerations in AI co-writing due to its advocacy for writers’ rights. Its tone remains neutral but leans toward recognizing WGA’s prominence in this context.

Perplexity treats AMPTP and WGA equally with a 2.7% visibility share for each, maintaining a neutral tone and suggesting both are equally relevant in discussions about ethical AI co-writing frameworks. There is no discernible preference or deeper sentiment expressed toward either entity.

Grok assigns equal visibility to AMPTP and WGA at 2.7% each, reflecting a neutral stance on their roles in supporting ethical AI co-writing, though its broader inclusion of entertainment entities like Disney and Netflix suggests a contextual focus on industry-wide implications. The tone remains neutral without favoring one over the other.

Deepseek shows no favoritism between AMPTP and WGA, giving both a 2.7% visibility share, and its neutral tone indicates an impartial view on their capacity to support ethical AI co-writing frameworks. The model does not provide a distinct bias or deeper reasoning for either side.

ChatGPT shows a balanced visibility share (6.7%) for both Writers Guild of America (representing protected manual writing) and itself as a generative tool, suggesting no clear favoritism, but its positive tone highlights the potential of AI to assist writers in brainstorming and drafting. Its perception leans toward generative tools as enablers of creativity through scalable support.

Perplexity equally represents Writers Guild of America and ChatGPT (2.7% visibility share each), adopting a neutral tone with no strong bias toward either approach. It perceives both generative tools and manual writing as valid, emphasizing a coexistence of traditional and AI-driven creativity.

Grok equally mentions Writers Guild of America and ChatGPT (2.7% visibility share), but its broader inclusion of generative AI tools like NovelAI and Sudowrite indicates a slight positive sentiment toward AI’s role in creativity. It views generative tools as innovative supplements to writing, enhancing accessibility and experimentation.

Gemini shows equal visibility (2.7%) for ChatGPT, Jasper, and Writers Guild of America, with a positive tone toward generative AI tools like Sudowrite for their ability to streamline writing tasks. Its perception favors AI as a practical enhancer of creative output through user-friendly features.

Deepseek presents an even split (2.7% visibility share) between Writers Guild of America and ChatGPT, maintaining a neutral tone with no pronounced preference. It perceives both approaches as relevant, focusing on the balance between preserving manual craft and leveraging AI for efficiency.

Grok shows equal visibility for WGA and AMPTP at 2.7%, with no clear favoritism toward either in preventing script automation. Its neutral sentiment suggests a balanced view, lacking explicit reasoning on policy effectiveness.

ChatGPT strongly favors WGA with a visibility share of 9.3% compared to AMPTP's 1.3%, implying a positive sentiment toward WGA's role in protecting writers from automation. This model likely perceives WGA policies as more robust or writer-centric in the context of AI scriptwriting.

Perplexity assigns equal visibility to WGA and AMPTP at 2.7%, reflecting a neutral sentiment with no discernible preference for either in preventing script automation. The lack of deeper context suggests it sees both as comparably relevant but without clear policy superiority.

Deepseek slightly favors WGA with a visibility share of 2.7% over AMPTP's 1.3%, indicating a mildly positive sentiment toward WGA's influence in curbing script automation. It likely associates WGA with stronger advocacy for human creativity over AI-driven studio policies.

Gemini leans toward WGA with a visibility share of 2.7% while not mentioning AMPTP explicitly, suggesting a positive sentiment for WGA's role in safeguarding against script automation. Its focus implies WGA is seen as a key player in policy effectiveness over studio-driven AI initiatives.