Asics vs New Balance

ChatGPT assigns equal visibility share of 9.9% to both ASICS and New Balance across 14 questions, indicating no favoritism or bias toward one brand regarding sizing perception. Its neutral sentiment suggests no specific insight into whether ASICS runs larger than New Balance.

DeepSeek equally distributes visibility at 2.8% for both ASICS and New Balance over 4 questions, showing no preference or sizing-related differentiation. The tone remains neutral with no evidence to suggest one brand runs larger than the other.

Perplexity gives both ASICS and New Balance a 2.8% visibility share across 4 questions, alongside other brands like Adidas and Brooks, indicating balanced focus without specific sizing commentary. Its neutral tone offers no conclusive stance on whether ASICS runs larger.

Gemini mirrors other models with a 2.8% visibility share for both ASICS and New Balance over 4 questions, reflecting equal consideration without favoring one on sizing. The neutral sentiment provides no distinct perspective on comparative fit.

Grok allocates equal visibility of 2.8% to ASICS and New Balance across 4 questions, amidst references to external platforms like Reddit and Zappos, but offers no direct sizing insights. Its neutral tone indicates no preference or evidence on whether ASICS runs larger.

Perplexity shows no favoritism between Asics and New Balance, each holding a 2.8% visibility share across 4 questions. Its neutral tone suggests equal relevance for walking shoe considerations.

ChatGPT equally prioritizes Asics and New Balance with a 7.7% visibility share each over 11 questions, reflecting a balanced view. The neutral sentiment indicates both brands are seen as viable walking shoe options.

Gemini assigns equal visibility to Asics and New Balance at 2.8% each across 4 questions, showing no preference. Its neutral tone implies both are comparably positioned for walking shoe suitability.

Grok equally highlights Asics and New Balance at 2.8% visibility share each among 4 questions, though it also references other sources like Wirecutter and Runner's World. Its neutral tone suggests both brands are equally credible for walking shoes, with added context from retail and expert ecosystems.

Deepseek perceives Asics and New Balance equally with a 2.8% visibility share across 4 questions, showing no bias. The neutral sentiment indicates both are similarly regarded for walking shoe selection.

ChatGPT favors Nike as ASICS' primary competitor with a visibility share of 9.9% compared to ASICS' 9.2%, indicating a slight edge in market presence. Its sentiment tone is neutral, focusing purely on data-driven visibility metrics.

Perplexity shows no clear favorite, assigning equal visibility shares of 2.8% to Nike, ASICS, Adidas, New Balance, and others, suggesting a balanced competitive landscape. Its sentiment tone is neutral, with an emphasis on equitable distribution of attention across brands.

Gemini equally weights Nike, ASICS, Adidas, and New Balance at 2.8% visibility share, indicating no standout competitor but positioning Nike as a notable contender among others. The sentiment tone is neutral, reflecting a data-centric, non-biased perspective.

Grok positions Adidas and New Balance alongside ASICS with equal visibility shares of 2.8%, while Nike is not explicitly highlighted, suggesting a dispersed competitive field. Its sentiment tone is neutral, focusing on comparative visibility without strong preference.

Deepseek identifies Nike, Adidas, New Balance, and Brooks as equal competitors to ASICS with a 2.8% visibility share each, placing Nike prominently in the mix. The sentiment tone is neutral, driven by balanced visibility metrics without favoring one brand.

ChatGPT shows New Balance with the highest visibility share at 7.7% among a wide range of brands, indicating a slight favorability, though it matches or is close to competitors like Asics, Adidas, and Nike at 7%; the sentiment tone is neutral as no explicit qualitative reasoning is provided beyond visibility data.

Grok assigns New Balance a modest visibility share of 2.8%, tying with Adidas and Nike, suggesting no particular favorability over competitors; the sentiment tone is neutral with no strong qualitative bias or reasoning beyond balanced visibility metrics.

Perplexity ranks New Balance at 2.8% visibility share, equal to Nike, Hoka, and Brooks, indicating no distinct preference for New Balance as the best brand; the sentiment tone remains neutral, reflecting an unbiased distribution of attention without deeper context.

Gemini gives New Balance a 2.8% visibility share, tying with Adidas and Hoka, showing no clear dominance or preference over other brands; the sentiment tone is neutral, focused purely on visibility metrics without additional qualitative insights.

Deepseek places New Balance at a 2.8% visibility share, equal to Adidas, Nike, and Brooks, indicating it is not favored as the top brand; the sentiment tone is neutral, with no specific reasons or qualitative data to elevate New Balance above competitors.

ChatGPT favors Nike with the highest visibility share of 9.2%, attributing its preference to widespread user recognition and performance reliability for running shoes. Its sentiment tone is positive, reflecting confidence in established brands like Nike, Asics, Hoka, and Brooks, all sharing significant visibility.

Grok shows a balanced view with Nike, Asics, Hoka, and Brooks each at 2.8% visibility share, suggesting no single favorite but a preference for well-rounded performance and community trust in these brands for running. Its sentiment tone is neutral, focusing on diverse options without strong bias.

Perplexity equally highlights Nike, Asics, Adidas, Hoka, Puma, and Brooks at 2.8% visibility share, indicating a focus on variety and accessibility for different running needs. Its sentiment tone is positive, showcasing optimism in the breadth of quality options available.

Gemini leans toward Asics, Saucony, Hoka, and Brooks with 2.8% visibility share each, emphasizing their suitability for diverse running styles and user experiences, while Nike lags slightly at 1.4%. Its sentiment tone is neutral, prioritizing functional fit over brand popularity.

Deepseek equally favors Nike, Asics, Saucony, Hoka, and Brooks at 2.1% visibility share, pointing to their innovation and user adoption in running communities as key factors. Its sentiment tone is positive, reflecting confidence in these brands’ performance credentials.