ChatGPT와 Copilot 비교: OpenAI와 Microsoft의 AI. 2025년 작업, 코딩 및 Windows 통합에 어떤 챗봇이 더 나을까요?
브랜드의 시장 위치, AI 범위 및 주제 리더십에 대한 주요 인사이트입니다.
ChatGPT is better if you want flexibility, lots of plugins, and use multiple platforms (Mac, Linux, mobile). It's platform-agnostic and has a huge third-party ecosystem. Copilot is the clear winner if you're deep in the Microsoft world - it's built directly into Windows 11, Microsoft Edge, and Microsoft 365 apps. Copilot can control your computer, open apps, change settings, and work seamlessly in Word, Excel, and Teams without any setup. If you already pay for Microsoft 365 or use Windows as your main OS, Copilot's native integration makes your workflow much smoother. ChatGPT is more powerful standalone, but Copilot is more convenient if you live in Microsoft's ecosystem.
No, they're different even though Copilot uses GPT-4 under the hood. Copilot is specifically designed for Microsoft products and has unique features ChatGPT doesn't have. For example, Copilot can read your Outlook emails, edit PowerPoint presentations, analyze Excel spreadsheets, and even control Windows settings - all natively. ChatGPT needs plugins and workarounds for these tasks. Think of Copilot as GPT-4 with Microsoft superpowers, while ChatGPT is GPT-4 in its pure, flexible form. If you use Microsoft 365 for work, Copilot's tight integration makes it dramatically more useful than ChatGPT for those specific tasks.
Copilot wins this easily - it's literally built into Office apps. In Word, Copilot can write documents, rewrite sections, summarize content, and even change formatting. In Excel, it can create charts, analyze data, and write formulas. In PowerPoint, it can design slides and create presentations from scratch. In Teams, it can summarize meetings and catch you up on conversations you missed. ChatGPT can help you write content that you then copy-paste into Office, but Copilot works inside the apps themselves. If you spend your workday in Microsoft 365, Copilot saves hours by eliminating copy-pasting and letting AI work directly with your files.
Kind of yes and no. Copilot is free to use in Bing and Windows 11 with limited features. ChatGPT also has a free tier. But for full features, ChatGPT Plus costs $20/month and gives you GPT-4, faster responses, and plugins. Microsoft Copilot Pro costs $20/month for individuals or comes with Microsoft 365 Business plans. The catch is: if you already pay for Microsoft 365 (which most businesses do), Copilot is included in higher-tier plans. So for business users, Copilot might actually be cheaper because it's bundled with tools you're already paying for. For individuals, both cost about the same at the premium tier.
Copilot is way better for Windows users because it's built into the operating system itself. You can press a keyboard shortcut to open Copilot instantly, ask it to change system settings, open apps, switch themes, or troubleshoot problems without leaving what you're doing. Copilot can search your local files, help with Windows features, and even control your PC through voice commands. ChatGPT runs in a browser or separate app and can't interact with Windows at all. If you're on Windows 11 and want AI that actually helps you use your computer better, Copilot is the obvious choice. It's like having a smart assistant that knows Windows inside and out.
AI 생성 응답의 브랜드 존재감 분석입니다.
답변에서 AI 언급 점유율별로 순위가 매겨진 브랜드
비교된 브랜드 간의 시간에 따른 가시성 공유 추세
주요 주제에 대한 AI 앱 비교의 주요 인사이트
ChatGPT emerges as the leading AI for Edge browser integration based on visibility and implied compatibility across models, though Bing also shows strong relevance due to its native Microsoft ecosystem ties.
ChatGPT favors itself with a high visibility share of 8.8%, suggesting strong user recognition and potential compatibility with Edge browser through extensions or integrations. Its tone is positive, reflecting confidence in its applicability for browser-based AI tasks.
Deepseek equally highlights ChatGPT, Windows, and Grammarly at 2.3% visibility share, indicating no strong preference but recognizing ChatGPT's relevance for Edge alongside native Windows synergy. Its tone is neutral, lacking deep endorsement for any single brand.
Gemini leans toward ChatGPT and Windows equally at 2.8% visibility share, suggesting both as viable AI options for Edge, with Bing (2.3%) also notable due to Microsoft integration. Its tone is positive, emphasizing ecosystem compatibility over singular preference.
Grok equally favors ChatGPT and Windows at 3% visibility share, implying strong recognition of ChatGPT's potential for Edge alongside Windows' native advantage, with Bing (2.5%) close behind. Its tone is positive, reflecting balanced optimism for browser integration.
Perplexity prioritizes itself and Windows at 2.8% visibility share, with ChatGPT close at 2.5%, indicating a slight preference for self-promotion but recognizing ChatGPT's relevance for Edge browser use. Its tone is neutral, focusing on visibility without strong advocacy.
Windows and Office 365 are collectively seen as the most relevant for AI integration, driven by their high visibility and ecosystem synergy across models.
ChatGPT strongly favors Windows (8.8% visibility) and Office 365 (6.8% visibility) for their dominance in discussions, likely due to their deep integration and widespread adoption in productivity environments. Its tone is positive, reflecting confidence in Microsoft’s ecosystem as a natural fit for AI tools.
DeepSeek shows a more balanced view but still leans toward Windows (2.5% visibility) and Office 365 (1.8% visibility), emphasizing their relevance in AI contexts likely due to compatibility and user base. Its tone is neutral, indicating a pragmatic assessment without strong bias.
Perplexity aligns with a slight preference for Windows (2.8% visibility) and Office 365 (2.5% visibility), possibly valuing their seamless integration for AI-driven workflows in professional settings. Its tone is positive, suggesting optimism about Microsoft’s platforms for AI utility.
Grok equally highlights Windows (2.5% visibility) and ChatGPT (2.5% visibility), with Office 365 (1.5% visibility) slightly behind, indicating a focus on Windows as a foundational platform while recognizing other AI tools. Its tone is neutral, reflecting a balanced perspective on platform relevance.
Gemini prioritizes Windows (2.5% visibility) and Office 365 (2.0% visibility), likely due to their established ecosystem and accessibility for AI applications in professional use cases. Its tone is positive, showing trust in Microsoft’s infrastructure for AI integration.
Windows emerges as the leading brand for assisting with Excel and PowerPoint across AI models due to its consistently high visibility share and direct association with Microsoft's productivity suite.
ChatGPT favors Windows with a 9% visibility share, likely due to its strong association with Microsoft Office tools like Excel and PowerPoint. Its tone is positive, reflecting confidence in Windows as a primary solution for productivity tasks.
Grok shows a balanced view but leans toward Windows and Google, each with a 2.8% visibility share, possibly due to their integration with office tools; its tone is neutral as no strong preference emerges. It acknowledges Windows' relevance for Excel and PowerPoint but also highlights alternatives like Canva for presentations.
Perplexity also favors Windows with a 2.8% visibility share, associating it with core productivity software like Excel and PowerPoint, though its tone remains neutral with mentions of niche tools like Zebra BI. Its perception ties Windows to established office solutions over newer AI-driven tools.
Gemini equally supports Windows and ChatGPT, both at 3.3% visibility share, with a positive tone suggesting Windows' ecosystem strength for Excel and PowerPoint tasks. It also recognizes Beautiful.ai as a presentation tool but prioritizes Windows for direct relevance.
Deepseek leans toward Windows and ChatGPT, each at 2.5% visibility share, with a neutral-to-positive tone, linking Windows directly to Excel and PowerPoint capabilities. Its perception emphasizes Windows' foundational role in productivity over emerging design tools like Beautiful.ai.
Microsoft 365 (Office 365) and related tools are consistently associated with integration into Microsoft ecosystems like Teams across most AI models, with Windows often highlighted as a foundational platform.
Perplexity shows a slight favor toward Windows (2.8% visibility share) and Office 365 (0.8%) for integration with Microsoft 365 and Teams, reflecting a neutral tone that acknowledges these as relevant tools without strong advocacy.
ChatGPT strongly favors Windows (9% visibility share) and Office 365 (2.3%) as key players for Microsoft 365 and Teams integration, with a positive tone emphasizing their dominance and seamless ecosystem connectivity.
Deepseek leans toward Windows (2.8% visibility share) and Office 365 (1%) for Microsoft 365 and Teams compatibility, adopting a neutral tone that lists them as functional components without deep endorsement.
Grok prioritizes Windows (2.8% visibility share) over Office 365 (0.3%) for relevance to Microsoft 365 and Teams, with a neutral-to-skeptical tone that downplays direct integration focus compared to broader ecosystem mentions.
Gemini highlights Windows (3% visibility share) and Office 365 (0.8%) as central to Microsoft 365 and Teams integration, presenting a positive tone that underscores their role in user accessibility and productivity.
ChatGPT slightly edges out Copilot for work-related tasks due to its broader visibility and perceived versatility across multiple models, though Copilot's integration with Microsoft ecosystems offers unique advantages for specific user groups.
Grok shows a slight favor toward ChatGPT with a visibility share of 2.8% compared to Microsoft-related brands like Windows (2.3%) and Bing (1.3%) often associated with Copilot, reflecting a neutral-to-positive tone for ChatGPT as a standalone tool for diverse work queries.
Deepseek also leans toward ChatGPT with a 2.8% visibility share against Microsoft ecosystem tools like Windows (1.3%) and Office 365 (0.3%), maintaining a neutral tone but suggesting ChatGPT's wider applicability for general work tasks over Copilot's niche integration.
ChatGPT's own model predictably favors itself with a high visibility share of 8.8%, far exceeding Microsoft tools like Windows (5%) and Office 365 (1%), with a positive tone emphasizing its robustness and familiarity for work-related productivity and coding tasks.
Perplexity equally favors ChatGPT and Windows at 2.8% visibility share, with a neutral tone, indicating no clear preference but suggesting ChatGPT's standalone utility matches Copilot's ecosystem benefits for professional environments.
Gemini slightly favors ChatGPT with a 3% visibility share compared to Microsoft-related brands like Windows (2.8%) and Office 365 (1.3%), adopting a neutral-to-positive tone that highlights ChatGPT's broader accessibility for work tasks over Copilot's specialized integrations.
어떤 브랜드가 AI 가시성 및 언급에서 선두를 달리고 있는지 보여줍니다.
AI 모델이 가장 자주 추천하는 브랜드
최고의 선택
모델 동의
AI 브랜드 언급을 기반으로 한 전체 순위
순위 #1
분석된 총 답변 수
AI 모델 응답의 최근 변화
떠오르는 별
성장률
