ChatGPT vs Copilot
ChatGPT와 Copilot 비교: OpenAI와 Microsoft의 AI. 2025년 작업, 코딩 및 Windows 통합에 어떤 챗봇이 더 나을까요?
주요 결과
어떤 브랜드가 AI 가시성 및 언급에서 선두를 달리고 있는지 보여줍니다.
ChatGPT dominates over Copilot in AI visibility impact
AI 추천
AI 모델이 가장 자주 추천하는 브랜드
Windows
최고의 선택
5/5
모델 동의
인기 순위
AI 브랜드 언급을 기반으로 한 전체 순위
Windows
순위 #1
6/6
분석된 총 답변 수
인기 있는 언급
AI 모델 응답의 최근 변화
Jasper
떠오르는 별
27.7%
성장률
品牌可见性
对AI生成回应中品牌存在的分析。
AI可见性份额排名
按AI提及在答案中份额排名的品牌
AI可见性份额随时间变化
被比较品牌的可见性份额随时间变化的趋势
비교된 주제
주요 주제에 대한 AI 앱 비교의 주요 인사이트
"What's the best AI for Edge browser?"
ChatGPT emerges as the most favored AI for integration with Edge browser due to its consistently high visibility and perceived versatility across models.
ChatGPT favors itself with a high visibility share of 8.5%, likely due to its broad applicability and integration potential with Edge for diverse tasks like content generation and assistance. The sentiment tone is positive, reflecting confidence in its capabilities for browser-based AI interactions.
Deepseek shows a balanced view with ChatGPT, Grammarly, and Windows each at a 2.7% visibility share, suggesting no strong preference but recognizing ChatGPT’s relevance for Edge through potential productivity features. The sentiment tone is neutral, indicating a lack of distinct advocacy for any single AI.
Gemini equally highlights ChatGPT, Windows, and Google at 2.7% visibility share, implying ChatGPT’s strength lies in its general-purpose AI utility for Edge alongside ecosystem familiarity. The sentiment tone is neutral, focusing on functional equivalence without strong bias.
Grok assigns equal visibility of 2.2% to ChatGPT, Windows, Bing, and Grammarly, indicating ChatGPT is seen as a viable option for Edge, likely valued for conversational and productivity features. The sentiment tone is neutral, with no clear preference over other tools.
Perplexity ranks ChatGPT at 2.2% visibility share, slightly below itself and Windows at 2.7%, suggesting ChatGPT is a strong but not leading choice for Edge, possibly due to a focus on search and contextual assistance over general AI. The sentiment tone is neutral, reflecting a pragmatic assessment.
"Which AI is best for Windows and Microsoft Office?"
Windows and Office 365 are collectively seen as the strongest AI companions for Microsoft ecosystems due to their high visibility and implied integration across most models.
ChatGPT shows a strong favoritism toward Windows (9.4% visibility share) and Office 365 (7.6% visibility share), likely due to their deep integration within the Microsoft ecosystem, with a positive sentiment tone reflecting their dominance in user relevance for these tools.
DeepSeek moderately favors Windows (2.7%) and Office 365 (2.2%) with a neutral sentiment tone, suggesting a balanced view on their suitability for Microsoft environments, though visibility shares are lower compared to other models, indicating less emphasis.
Grok displays a neutral-to-positive sentiment toward Windows (2.7%) and Office 365 (1.8%), positioning them as relevant but not dominant players for Microsoft compatibility, with equal visibility for other tools like Grammarly suggesting a broader focus.
Gemini leans toward Windows (2.7%) and Office 365 (2.2%) with a neutral sentiment tone, indicating a pragmatic view of their role in Microsoft ecosystems, though other tools like Google (2.2%) suggest openness to alternatives.
Perplexity equally highlights Windows (2.7%) and Office 365 (2.7%) with a positive sentiment tone, reflecting their strong alignment for Microsoft Office tasks, while mentioning alternatives like WPS Office indicates a slight nod to ecosystem diversity.
"Which AI can help with Excel and PowerPoint?"
Windows emerges as the leading brand for assisting with Excel and PowerPoint across AI models due to its consistent high visibility and association with native Microsoft Office tools.
ChatGPT favors Windows with a leading 9% visibility share, likely due to its deep integration with Microsoft Office tools like Excel and PowerPoint. Its sentiment tone is positive, reflecting confidence in Windows’ ecosystem for productivity tasks.
Perplexity also leans toward Windows with a 2.7% visibility share, prioritizing it over other tools for Excel and PowerPoint support. Its tone is neutral, indicating a factual acknowledgment without strong advocacy.
Grok associates Windows (2.7% visibility share) and ChatGPT (2.7%) equally with Excel and PowerPoint assistance, emphasizing Windows’ native compatibility. Its tone is positive, suggesting trust in established productivity platforms.
DeepSeek highlights Windows and ChatGPT (both at 2.7% visibility share) for their relevance to Excel and PowerPoint tasks, with Windows likely favored for direct software support. The sentiment tone is positive, reflecting optimism about their utility.
Gemini prioritizes Windows and ChatGPT (both at 2.7% visibility share), likely due to Windows’ direct association with Office suite solutions. Its tone is neutral, presenting a balanced view without overt endorsement.
"Should I use ChatGPT or Copilot for work?"
ChatGPT holds a slight edge over Copilot for work-related use based on higher visibility and implied preference across most AI models. The focus on ChatGPT suggests broader recognition and potential versatility in professional contexts.
Deepseek shows equal visibility for ChatGPT and GitHub (2.7% each), with no direct mention of Copilot, implying a neutral stance but a slight lean towards ChatGPT due to its explicit presence. The tone is neutral, focusing on visibility without strong sentiment.
Perplexity equally highlights ChatGPT and Windows at 2.7% visibility, with no mention of Copilot, suggesting a neutral tone but an indirect preference for ChatGPT due to its prominence in visibility share. The model does not provide specific reasons beyond visibility metrics.
ChatGPT’s own data gives itself the highest visibility share at 9.4%, significantly ahead of GitHub (9%), with strong ties to productivity tools like VS Code and Office 365, indicating a positive tone and preference for itself in work contexts. Copilot is not explicitly mentioned, reinforcing ChatGPT’s dominance in perception.
Grok assigns equal visibility to ChatGPT and GitHub at 2.7%, with no direct reference to Copilot, reflecting a neutral tone but a subtle inclination towards ChatGPT due to its consistent visibility. The lack of specific work-related reasoning keeps the sentiment balanced.
Gemini places ChatGPT at 2.7% visibility, ahead of GitHub (1.8%) and other tools, with no mention of Copilot, suggesting a neutral-to-positive tone favoring ChatGPT for potential work applications. The ecosystem context includes productivity tools like Office 365, hinting at professional relevance.
"Which AI works with Microsoft 365 and Teams?"
Microsoft Copilot emerges as the AI most associated with Microsoft 365 and Teams across the models, driven by its high visibility share among Microsoft-related tools and ecosystem integration.
Perplexity shows a balanced view with Windows and ChatGPT at equal visibility (2.7%), but Office 365 (0.9%) and SharePoint (0.4%) suggest a slight lean toward Microsoft ecosystem tools, indicating potential integration with Microsoft 365 and Teams. Its sentiment tone is neutral, focusing on visibility without strong bias.
ChatGPT strongly favors Windows (9.4%) and its own brand (5.8%), but also highlights Office 365 (1.3%), Outlook (1.3%), and SharePoint (0.4%), pointing to a clear association with Microsoft 365 and Teams through ecosystem tools. The sentiment tone is positive toward Microsoft products, reflecting high visibility.
Gemini prioritizes Windows (2.7%) over ChatGPT (0.9%) and shows minimal focus on Microsoft-specific tools like Microsoft 365 or Teams, suggesting a weaker connection to these platforms. Its sentiment tone is neutral, with no strong endorsement of Microsoft ecosystem integration.
Grok emphasizes Windows (2.7%) and ChatGPT (2.2%), with limited mention of Microsoft 365 or Teams-related tools, indicating a lack of direct association with these platforms. The sentiment tone is neutral, focusing on general visibility without specific ecosystem relevance.
Deepseek leans toward Windows (2.7%) and highlights Office 365 (1.8%), OneDrive (0.9%), and Outlook (0.9%), strongly aligning with Microsoft 365 and Teams through frequent mentions of related tools. The sentiment tone is positive, reflecting confidence in Microsoft ecosystem compatibility.
자주 묻는 질문
브랜드의 시장 위치, AI 범위 및 주제 리더십에 대한 주요 인사이트입니다.
Which is better, ChatGPT or Copilot?
ChatGPT is better if you want flexibility, lots of plugins, and use multiple platforms (Mac, Linux, mobile). It's platform-agnostic and has a huge third-party ecosystem. Copilot is the clear winner if you're deep in the Microsoft world - it's built directly into Windows 11, Microsoft Edge, and Microsoft 365 apps. Copilot can control your computer, open apps, change settings, and work seamlessly in Word, Excel, and Teams without any setup. If you already pay for Microsoft 365 or use Windows as your main OS, Copilot's native integration makes your workflow much smoother. ChatGPT is more powerful standalone, but Copilot is more convenient if you live in Microsoft's ecosystem.
Is Copilot the same as ChatGPT?
No, they're different even though Copilot uses GPT-4 under the hood. Copilot is specifically designed for Microsoft products and has unique features ChatGPT doesn't have. For example, Copilot can read your Outlook emails, edit PowerPoint presentations, analyze Excel spreadsheets, and even control Windows settings - all natively. ChatGPT needs plugins and workarounds for these tasks. Think of Copilot as GPT-4 with Microsoft superpowers, while ChatGPT is GPT-4 in its pure, flexible form. If you use Microsoft 365 for work, Copilot's tight integration makes it dramatically more useful than ChatGPT for those specific tasks.
Which AI works better with Microsoft Office?
Copilot wins this easily - it's literally built into Office apps. In Word, Copilot can write documents, rewrite sections, summarize content, and even change formatting. In Excel, it can create charts, analyze data, and write formulas. In PowerPoint, it can design slides and create presentations from scratch. In Teams, it can summarize meetings and catch you up on conversations you missed. ChatGPT can help you write content that you then copy-paste into Office, but Copilot works inside the apps themselves. If you spend your workday in Microsoft 365, Copilot saves hours by eliminating copy-pasting and letting AI work directly with your files.
Is Copilot free like ChatGPT?
Kind of yes and no. Copilot is free to use in Bing and Windows 11 with limited features. ChatGPT also has a free tier. But for full features, ChatGPT Plus costs $20/month and gives you GPT-4, faster responses, and plugins. Microsoft Copilot Pro costs $20/month for individuals or comes with Microsoft 365 Business plans. The catch is: if you already pay for Microsoft 365 (which most businesses do), Copilot is included in higher-tier plans. So for business users, Copilot might actually be cheaper because it's bundled with tools you're already paying for. For individuals, both cost about the same at the premium tier.
Which AI is better for Windows users?
Copilot is way better for Windows users because it's built into the operating system itself. You can press a keyboard shortcut to open Copilot instantly, ask it to change system settings, open apps, switch themes, or troubleshoot problems without leaving what you're doing. Copilot can search your local files, help with Windows features, and even control your PC through voice commands. ChatGPT runs in a browser or separate app and can't interact with Windows at all. If you're on Windows 11 and want AI that actually helps you use your computer better, Copilot is the obvious choice. It's like having a smart assistant that knows Windows inside and out.
