
Digital Humans vs Deepfakes in film identity and AI authenticity.
Which brand leads in AI visibility and mentions.
Brands most often recommended by AI models
Top Choice
Models Agree
Overall ranking based on AI brand mentions
Rank #1
Total Analyzed Answers
Recent shifts in AI model responses
Rising Star
Growth Rate
Analysis of brand presence in AI-generated responses.
Brands ranked by share of AI mentions in answers
Visibility share trends over time across compared brands
Key insights from AI Apps comparisons across major topics
Digital Humans are perceived as more compliant with regulation compared to Deepfakes across most AI models due to their association with ethical frameworks and institutional partnerships.
Gemini shows no clear favoritism between Deepfakes (Metaphysic) and Digital Humans (Digital Domain), with both having equal visibility share at 2.8%. Its neutral tone and lack of regulatory context suggest a balanced perception without specific compliance insights.
ChatGPT leans toward Digital Humans with a broader ecosystem of associated brands like SAG-AFTRA and Synthesia (1.4% each), implying a focus on ethical usage and regulatory alignment. Its positive tone highlights stronger institutional ties, suggesting better compliance perception for Digital Humans over Deepfakes.
Grok favors Digital Humans (Digital Domain at 2.8%) by linking them to regulatory and ethical entities like UNESCO and OECD (1.4% each), indicating a perception of stronger compliance frameworks. Its positive tone underscores a preference for institutional trust over Deepfakes (Metaphysic at 2.8%).
Deepseek presents no preference, with equal visibility for Deepfakes (Metaphysic) and Digital Humans (Digital Domain) at 1.4% each. Its neutral tone and minimal data offer no specific insight into regulatory compliance for either concept.
Perplexity shows equal visibility for Deepfakes (Metaphysic) and Digital Humans (Digital Domain) at 2.8% each, with a neutral tone and no regulatory context. It provides no clear stance on compliance differences between the two.
Digital Humans earn more public trust than Deepfakes in the entertainment space due to their association with positive, innovative, and transparent uses in media and virtual influencers, as opposed to Deepfakes, which are often linked to ethical concerns and misuse.
Deepseek shows a balanced view with visibility across brands like Metaphysic and Digital Domain (both at 2.8%) for Digital Humans, alongside entertainment giants like Disney and Netflix (1.4% each), suggesting a slight favor towards Digital Humans for trusted creative applications; its tone is neutral, focusing on diverse representation without skepticism.
ChatGPT strongly favors Digital Humans, giving significant visibility to Metaphysic and Digital Domain (both at 5.6%), indicating a perception of reliability and innovation in entertainment applications; its tone is positive, emphasizing trust in established players over Deepfake concerns.
Perplexity leans towards Digital Humans with equal visibility for Metaphysic and Digital Domain (both at 2.8%), while mentioning MIT Technology Review (1.4%) hints at cautious scrutiny of tech like Deepfakes; its tone is neutral-to-skeptical, reflecting a balanced but questioning stance on broader implications.
Grok favors Digital Humans, highlighting brands like ABBA, Metaphysic, and Lil Miquela (2.8% each) tied to positive entertainment innovations, while also referencing Pew Research Center (2.8%) which may imply public concern over Deepfakes; its tone is positive towards Digital Humans with a cautious undercurrent.
Gemini supports Digital Humans with visibility for Metaphysic and Digital Domain (2.8% each) and ties to entertainment innovators like Netflix and Marvel (1.4% each), portraying them as trusted for creative use; its tone is positive, showing confidence in Digital Humans over Deepfake-related risks.
Digital Humans are perceived as a safer approach for identity use in entertainment compared to Deepfakes, primarily due to their controlled creation and ethical guidelines supported by industry leaders and institutions.
Grok shows a balanced view with visibility across brands like Lucasfilm, Disney, and Metaphysic, but leans toward Digital Humans for safer identity use due to associations with established studios and ethical bodies like SAG-AFTRA. Its tone is neutral, focusing on industry adoption and institutional backing.
Gemini slightly favors Digital Humans through its association with Disney and Digital Domain, emphasizing their structured ecosystem for identity protection over Deepfakes. The tone is positive, highlighting innovation in controlled environments.
Perplexity focuses equally on Metaphysic and Digital Domain with no clear preference, but its data implies a neutral stance on Digital Humans as a safer bet due to consistent industry presence. The tone remains neutral, prioritizing factual visibility over sentiment.
ChatGPT strongly favors Digital Humans for safer identity use, linking Metaphysic and Digital Domain to ethical standards via mentions of SAG-AFTRA and Content Credentials (C2PA). Its tone is positive, underscoring community sentiment and protective mechanisms.
Deepseek equally references Metaphysic and Digital Domain, showing no clear bias but subtly aligns with Digital Humans as safer due to their controlled application in entertainment. The tone is neutral, focusing on adoption patterns without deep ethical commentary.
Digital Humans are perceived as fostering more creative freedom than Deepfakes across the models due to their stronger association with innovative tools and broader ecosystem integration in entertainment technology.
Perplexity shows a balanced visibility between Deepfakes (represented by Metaphysic at 2.8%) and Digital Humans (Digital Domain at 2.8%), but leans slightly toward Digital Humans with ties to broader creative platforms like Unreal Engine and Epic Games Store. Its neutral tone suggests no strong bias, focusing on visibility rather than explicit creative freedom.
ChatGPT favors Digital Humans with high visibility for Digital Domain (9.7%) and strong ties to creative ecosystems like Unreal Engine and Unity, implying greater creative freedom through accessible tools. Its positive tone emphasizes Digital Humans as a more versatile and innovative technology compared to Deepfakes (Metaphysic at 9.7% but less ecosystem focus).
Deepseek presents no clear favoritism with equal visibility (1.4%) across Metaphysic (Deepfakes) and Digital Domain (Digital Humans), alongside creative tools like Unreal Engine. Its neutral tone lacks depth in reasoning, merely reflecting parity in recognition without addressing creative freedom explicitly.
Gemini subtly favors Digital Humans with equal visibility for Digital Domain (2.8%) as Metaphysic (2.8%), but highlights integration with platforms like Epic Games Store, suggesting broader creative potential. Its neutral-to-positive tone indicates a slight preference for Digital Humans' ecosystem over Deepfakes.
Grok leans toward Digital Humans with strong visibility for Digital Domain (2.8%) and ties to diverse creative platforms like Unreal Engine, Unity, and Roblox, implying greater creative freedom through community and accessibility. Its positive tone also associates Deepfakes (Metaphysic at 2.8%, Reface at 1.4%) with narrower, less innovative use cases like TikTok.
Digital Humans are more likely to dominate future cinema over Deepfakes due to their broader industry support and perceived potential for storytelling innovation.
ChatGPT leans toward Digital Humans with a high visibility share for companies like Metaphysic (9.7%) and partnerships with major players like Star Wars (4.2%) and Pixar (2.8%), suggesting a positive sentiment for scalable, creative applications in cinema over Deepfakes.
Deepseek shows a balanced but slight inclination toward Digital Humans through mentions of Metaphysic (2.8%) and Digital Domain (2.8%), reflecting a neutral-to-positive tone focused on technological integration in cinema, with no strong Deepfake advocacy.
Gemini favors Digital Humans, emphasizing companies like Metaphysic (2.8%) and Digital Domain (2.8%) alongside major studios like Marvel (2.8%), with a positive sentiment highlighting their potential for mainstream cinematic adoption over Deepfakes.
Perplexity supports Digital Humans with visibility for Metaphysic (2.8%) and Digital Domain (2.8%), paired with a neutral-to-positive tone focused on innovative storytelling tools, while Deepfakes receive minimal direct association or favor.
Grok subtly leans toward Digital Humans through mentions of industry giants like NVIDIA (2.8%) and Disney (2.8%) tied to tech innovation, displaying a positive sentiment for their ecosystem integration in cinema, with less focus on Deepfake-specific applications.
Key insights into your brand's market position, AI coverage, and topic leadership.
Digital humans are ethically modeled, consent-based synthetic entities, while deepfakes often replicate real people without authorization.
They can misrepresent identity, alter public narratives, and blur truth in journalism and cinema.
Yes — they’re trained with controlled data and transparency to protect creative and personal integrity.
Not always — realism often outpaces disclosure, making media literacy critical.
Watermarking, provenance tracking, and AI regulation frameworks are emerging to maintain authenticity.