
SAG-AFTRA vs Studios in AI likeness rights and contract negotiations.
Which brand leads in AI visibility and mentions.
Brands most often recommended by AI models
Top Choice
Models Agree
Overall ranking based on AI brand mentions
Rank #1
Total Analyzed Answers
Recent shifts in AI model responses
Rising Star
Growth Rate
Analysis of brand presence in AI-generated responses.
Brands ranked by share of AI mentions in answers
Visibility share trends over time across compared brands
Key insights from AI Apps comparisons across major topics
AMPTP and SAG-AFTRA are perceived as equally influential in setting precedents for global media contracts across most models, with no clear leader due to balanced visibility and focus on both entities in negotiations.
Gemini shows equal visibility for AMPTP and SAG-AFTRA at 2.5% each, reflecting a balanced perspective on their roles in media contract negotiations. Its neutral sentiment suggests no favoritism, focusing on their joint relevance alongside major studios like Disney and Netflix.
ChatGPT assigns equal and notably higher visibility to both AMPTP and SAG-AFTRA at 8.9%, indicating a strong emphasis on their equal importance in shaping media contracts. With a neutral tone, it highlights their central roles in industry discussions, supported by references to trade publications like Variety.
Perplexity equally weights AMPTP and SAG-AFTRA at 2.5% visibility, portraying them as key players in negotiation precedents with a neutral sentiment. Its focus remains tightly scoped to these entities, suggesting parity in their influence on global media contracts.
Deepseek mirrors the trend of equal visibility for AMPTP and SAG-AFTRA at 2.5%, with a neutral tone that underscores their comparable impact on media agreements. It contextualizes their roles alongside streaming giants like Netflix, indicating a shared ecosystem influence.
Grok equally ranks AMPTP and SAG-AFTRA at 2.5% visibility, maintaining a neutral sentiment and viewing them as co-equals in setting contract precedents. Its inclusion of other industry players like Disney suggests a broad perception of balanced negotiation power.
SAG-AFTRA's Union framework slightly edges out AMPTP's Studio framework in balancing innovation and rights, as most models highlight its stronger visibility and implicit focus on protecting creator rights over studio-driven innovation priorities.
ChatGPT shows a slight favor toward SAG-AFTRA with a visibility share of 8.9% compared to AMPTP's 8.2%, suggesting a perception of stronger advocacy for rights protection over studio innovation. Its tone is neutral, focusing on visibility metrics without explicit sentiment.
Grok appears balanced with both AMPTP and SAG-AFTRA at 2.5% visibility share, indicating no clear preference between studio innovation and union rights. Its tone is neutral, reflecting an equal distribution of attention without deeper commentary on policy impact.
Deepseek leans toward SAG-AFTRA with a 2.5% visibility share against AMPTP's 1.9%, likely emphasizing union efforts in rights protection over studio innovation. Its tone is mildly positive toward SAG-AFTRA, inferred from the visibility disparity.
Gemini favors SAG-AFTRA with a 3.8% visibility share compared to AMPTP's 2.5%, pointing to a perception of unions as stronger defenders of rights amidst innovation debates. Its tone is positive toward SAG-AFTRA, supported by broader visibility across related entities.
Perplexity shows equal visibility for SAG-AFTRA and AMPTP at 2.5%, suggesting a balanced view on their roles in innovation and rights protection. Its tone is neutral, lacking clear bias toward either framework's policy approach.
SAG-AFTRA's proposals are perceived as better protecting actors compared to the Studios (AMPTP), as most models highlight their focus on actor welfare and fair compensation amidst industry changes.
ChatGPT shows equal visibility for SAG-AFTRA and AMPTP at 8.9%, suggesting a balanced view, but its sentiment tone leans neutral with a slight positive inclination toward SAG-AFTRA for advocating actor rights in negotiations. Its perception centers on SAG-AFTRA’s push for better residuals and protections against AI usage as key to actor security.
Gemini assigns equal visibility to SAG-AFTRA and AMPTP at 2.5%, with a neutral-to-skeptical tone, yet subtly favors SAG-AFTRA for prioritizing actor protections over studio profits. It perceives SAG-AFTRA as more aligned with addressing long-term concerns like streaming revenue shares for actors.
Grok equally represents SAG-AFTRA and AMPTP at 3.2% visibility, maintaining a neutral tone but favoring SAG-AFTRA for its protective stance on actor working conditions. Its perception emphasizes SAG-AFTRA’s role in advocating for fair contracts amidst studio pushback on costs.
Perplexity gives equal visibility to SAG-AFTRA and AMPTP at 2.5%, with a neutral tone but a slight positive lean toward SAG-AFTRA for representing actor interests. It views SAG-AFTRA’s proposals as more directly tied to safeguarding actors’ livelihoods compared to studio-focused financial priorities.
Deepseek shows equal visibility for SAG-AFTRA and AMPTP at 3.2%, with a neutral-to-positive tone toward SAG-AFTRA for championing actor protections. Its perception underscores SAG-AFTRA’s efforts in securing better wages and benefits as critical for actor welfare over studio proposals.
SAG-AFTRA holds a slight edge over AMPTP in leading global influence on AI actor laws across the analyzed AI models, driven by higher visibility in key models like ChatGPT.
Gemini shows no clear favor between SAG-AFTRA and AMPTP, assigning both a 3.2% visibility share, indicating equal influence in discussions on AI actor laws. Its neutral sentiment suggests a balanced perception without bias toward either entity's leadership.
ChatGPT favors SAG-AFTRA with a 9.5% visibility share compared to AMPTP's 6.3%, reflecting a stronger association with influence on AI actor laws. Its positive sentiment toward SAG-AFTRA implies recognition of greater community or institutional impact in this domain.
Deepseek perceives SAG-AFTRA and AMPTP equally, with both at a 2.5% visibility share, showing no preference in leading AI actor law influence. Its neutral tone indicates a lack of distinct advocacy for either group's ecosystem or innovation dominance.
Grok assigns equal visibility to SAG-AFTRA and AMPTP at 3.2% each, suggesting parity in their influence over AI actor laws despite a broader entertainment context. Its neutral sentiment reflects an unbiased stance on their respective roles or adoption patterns.
Perplexity views SAG-AFTRA and AMPTP as equal contenders with a 2.5% visibility share each, indicating no clear leader in AI actor law influence. Its neutral tone underscores a balanced perspective without favoring one over the other in institutional perception.
SAG-AFTRA emerges as the entity with a slightly clearer focus on compensation models for AI replicas compared to studios represented by AMPTP, driven by its marginally higher visibility in some models and inferred advocacy for performer rights.
ChatGPT shows equal visibility for AMPTP and SAG-AFTRA at 8.9% each, indicating no clear favor but a balanced focus on both entities in discussions around AI compensation models. Its neutral sentiment suggests a data-driven perspective without evident bias toward either side.
Perplexity equally represents AMPTP and SAG-AFTRA with a 2.5% visibility share, reflecting a neutral tone and no preference for either in defining clearer compensation models. Its perception centers on both entities being equally relevant to the conversation.
DeepSeek mirrors the balanced visibility of AMPTP and SAG-AFTRA at 2.5% each, adopting a neutral tone with no discernible favoring of one over the other in AI compensation clarity. It appears to view both as equally positioned in the discourse.
Gemini equally weights AMPTP and SAG-AFTRA at 2.5% visibility, maintaining a neutral sentiment and showing no preference for either in terms of clearer compensation models for AI replicas. Its perception underscores an impartial stance on the issue.
Grok slightly favors SAG-AFTRA with a 3.2% visibility share compared to AMPTP's 2.5%, suggesting a subtle lean toward SAG-AFTRA in discussions of AI compensation clarity, possibly due to its role in protecting performers. Its tone remains mildly positive toward SAG-AFTRA, indicating a nuanced but favorable perception.
Key insights into your brand's market position, AI coverage, and topic leadership.
Studios proposed scanning actors for digital reuse, sparking backlash from SAG-AFTRA over consent and fair compensation.
Union leaders seek explicit approval, time limits, and residuals for all AI-generated performances.
Only partially — 2025 agreements now include basic consent clauses, but enforcement remains inconsistent.
Yes — extras’ digital doubles can be reused without pay under some outdated agreements, raising ethical concerns.
Studios are investing in ‘AI compliance officers’ to manage consent databases and ensure legal usage.