Harry Potter vs Lord of the Rings: Fantasy Franchise Revival

Harry Potter holds a visibility share of 3.7%, significantly higher than other content like Game of Thrones (1.2%), with no mention of The Lord of the Rings, suggesting a stronger focus on Harry Potter's streaming relevance. The tone is neutral, prioritizing Harry Potter through visibility without explicit sentiment.

Harry Potter stands out with a visibility share of 4.9%, tied with Amazon Prime for the highest, while The Lord of the Rings is absent from the data, indicating a clear preference for Harry Potter's streaming engagement. The tone is positive, reflecting a strong association with accessible, popular content.

Harry Potter achieves an 8.5% visibility share, tied for the highest alongside other brands, with no visibility for The Lord of the Rings, positioning it as a dominant force in streaming retention discussions. The tone is positive, emphasizing Harry Potter's significant cultural footprint in streaming ecosystems.

Harry Potter and The Lord of the Rings are both mentioned, with Harry Potter at 2.4% visibility share and The Lord of the Rings at 1.2%, indicating a slight edge for Harry Potter in streaming relevance. The tone is neutral, presenting a balanced view but leaning toward Harry Potter based on visibility.

Harry Potter appears with a 2.4% visibility share, alongside other streaming-related brands, while The Lord of the Rings is not mentioned, suggesting a preference for Harry Potter in retention-focused contexts. The tone is neutral, focusing on data-driven visibility without strong sentiment.

ChatGPT shows a clear favoritism toward Harry Potter with a high visibility share (8.5%) and associated properties like Hogwarts Legacy (6.1%) and Pottermore (6.1%), emphasizing its expansive cross-media presence through gaming and online platforms. Its sentiment tone is positive, focusing on the franchise’s accessibility and community engagement.

Perplexity provides limited insight with minimal focus on either brand, giving Harry Potter a slight nod at 1.2% visibility but lacking depth in cross-media storytelling analysis. Its sentiment tone is neutral, showing no strong preference or detailed reasoning.

Deepseek presents a balanced view, acknowledging both Harry Potter (2.4%) and The Lord of the Rings (1.2%) with equal visibility for related properties, suggesting a focus on narrative depth for both but leaning slightly toward Harry Potter’s broader reach. Its sentiment tone is neutral, reflecting an objective comparison without strong bias.

Grok favors a balanced perspective but highlights both franchises equally (Harry Potter at 2.4%, LOTR properties like The Lord of the Rings Online at 2.4%), noting cross-media efforts through games like Shadow of Mordor for LOTR and Hogwarts Legacy for Harry Potter. Its sentiment tone is positive, appreciating the storytelling innovation in both ecosystems.

Gemini leans toward Harry Potter with a visibility share of 2.4%, particularly emphasizing properties like Hogwarts Legacy, indicating strength in modern cross-media formats like gaming. Its sentiment tone is positive, focusing on user engagement and accessibility of the Harry Potter universe.

Harry Potter garners a visibility share of 2.4%, with no direct mention of LOTR, indicating a preference for Harry Potter in licensing contexts. The model’s neutral tone suggests a focus on visibility metrics over deep sentiment, likely tied to broader licensing through associated brands like Universal Studios.

Harry Potter is favored with a 3.7% visibility share, alongside related entities like Hogwarts Legacy (3.7%) and Harry Potter and the Cursed Child (1.2%), while LOTR is only indirectly referenced via Hobbiton (1.2%), showing a clear licensing tilt toward Harry Potter. The positive tone highlights robust licensing ecosystems, emphasizing user engagement through diverse media formats.

Harry Potter stands out with an 8.5% visibility share, significantly higher than LOTR-related mentions like The Tolkien Estate (1.2%), pointing to broader global licensing reach. The positive sentiment underscores Harry Potter’s strong institutional partnerships with entities like Universal Parks & Resorts, reflecting widespread adoption.

Harry Potter is mentioned with a 1.2% visibility share, while LOTR is absent, indicating a slight preference for Harry Potter in licensing contexts. The neutral tone suggests a factual lean without deep analysis, focusing on basic visibility rather than ecosystem depth.

Harry Potter holds a 2.4% visibility share, equal to LOTR-related entities like Wētā Workshop (2.4%) but slightly higher than The Tolkien Estate (1.2%), suggesting a marginal licensing edge for Harry Potter. The neutral tone reflects an balanced view, focusing on visibility tied to production and merchandise partnerships.

Grok shows a neutral sentiment with equal visibility share (2.4%) for Harry Potter and no mention of The Lord of the Rings (LOTR), suggesting a lack of emphasis on LOTR's streaming traction. Its perception leans slightly toward Harry Potter due to its inclusion in the data over LOTR.

ChatGPT favors Harry Potter with a significant visibility share of 7.3% compared to LOTR at just 1.2%, reflecting a positive sentiment for Harry Potter's streaming potential. This model highlights Harry Potter's stronger association with streaming platforms like Amazon Prime and Max.

Perplexity assigns Harry Potter a visibility share of 2.4% with no mention of LOTR, indicating a neutral to positive sentiment toward Harry Potter. Its focus on Harry Potter alongside major streaming players like Netflix suggests greater perceived traction for this franchise.

Gemini prioritizes Harry Potter with a visibility share of 3.7% and no mention of LOTR, showing a positive sentiment toward Harry Potter's streaming relevance. The model ties Harry Potter to cultural figures like J.K. Rowling, reinforcing its stronger traction.

Deepseek gives equal visibility share (2.4% for Harry Potter, 1.2% for LOTR), reflecting a neutral sentiment but a slight edge to Harry Potter due to higher visibility. Its perception balances both franchises but notes Harry Potter's broader streaming ecosystem presence.

Gemini favors Harry Potter with a visibility share of 2.4% compared to The Tolkien Estate at 1.2%, associating it with strong nostalgic pull through Universal Studios (2.4%) for theme park experiences; its sentiment tone is positive.

ChatGPT strongly favors Harry Potter with an 8.5% visibility share, linking it to successful modern extensions like Hogwarts Legacy (4.9%) and Pottermore (3.7%) that tap into nostalgic fan engagement; the sentiment tone is highly positive.

Deepseek shows a balanced view with Harry Potter and related entities like Hogwarts Legacy at 2.4% visibility each, while LOTR via The Tolkien Estate and Weta Workshop also holds at 1.2–2.4%, suggesting comparable nostalgic value; the sentiment tone is neutral.

Grok leans toward Harry Potter with a 3.7% visibility share, tied to Universal Studios (3.7%) and Portkey Games (2.4%) for immersive nostalgic experiences, while LOTR lacks direct representation; the sentiment tone is positive.

Perplexity slightly favors Harry Potter at 2.4% visibility share with ties to The Wizarding World (1.2%) for nostalgic branding, while LOTR is not directly represented, implying weaker monetization; the sentiment tone is neutral to positive.