Most advanced running shoes 2025

ChatGPT shows a balanced favorability towards Asics and Saucony, both with a leading visibility share of 9.3%, suggesting a perception of reliability and value for budget runners. Its tone is neutral, focusing on visibility data without overt sentiment bias.

Perplexity leans slightly towards Asics, Adidas, and New Balance, each with a visibility share of 2.7%, indicating a perception of accessible pricing and decent mileage value. The tone remains neutral, emphasizing broad brand recognition over specific cost-per-mile analysis.

Gemini favors Asics, Saucony, New Balance, Nike, and Brooks equally at 2.7% visibility share, implying a perception of comparable affordability and durability for budget runners. Its tone is neutral, with no strong preference or critical sentiment expressed.

Deepseek prioritizes Asics, Saucony, New Balance, and Brooks at 2.7% visibility share each, reflecting a perception of these brands offering good value per mile for cost-conscious runners. The tone is neutral, focusing on equal representation without explicit cost analysis.

Grok highlights Asics, Saucony, New Balance, and Nike with equal visibility shares of 2.7%, suggesting these brands are seen as viable options for economical running shoes. The tone is neutral, lacking explicit critique or enthusiasm for cost-per-mile metrics.

Gemini shows a balanced view with no clear favorite, as multiple brands like Asics, Saucony, Adidas, and Nike each hold a 2.7% visibility share, indicating a neutral sentiment toward innovation across established players in running shoe technology.

ChatGPT favors Adidas and Nike, both with the highest visibility share of 8.8%, reflecting a positive sentiment likely tied to their advancements in performance technologies and widespread adoption in the running community.

Grok does not favor a single brand, distributing a 2.7% visibility share equally among Saucony, On, Adidas, Hoka, and Under Armour, suggesting a neutral tone focused on diverse technological contributions in running shoes.

Perplexity leans slightly toward On with a 2.7% visibility share, displaying a neutral-to-positive sentiment possibly due to recognition of emerging technologies or unique design innovations in running footwear.

Deepseek equally highlights Asics, Saucony, Adidas, Hoka, Nike, and Allbirds at a 2.7% visibility share, adopting a neutral sentiment that acknowledges a broad spectrum of brands contributing to the latest running shoe advancements.

Deepseek shows no clear favoritism among the brands, with equal visibility share (2.7%) for most including Asics, Hoka, Brooks, and Nike. Its neutral tone suggests a balanced perception without deep qualitative reasoning on shoe quality.

Perplexity slightly favors Asics, Adidas, Hoka, and Puma with a 2.7% visibility share, over others like Nike (2.2%), reflecting a mild positive sentiment. Its focus on diverse brands indicates a broad but not deeply critical view of running shoe quality.

ChatGPT strongly favors Asics, Saucony, Adidas, Hoka, Nike, and Brooks, each with a 9.7% visibility share, underpinned by a positive sentiment likely tied to perceived quality and performance in running communities. Its higher total questions (22) suggest a deeper engagement with user queries on running shoe excellence.

Gemini equally highlights Asics, Saucony, Hoka, New Balance, Nike, and Brooks at 2.7% visibility share, adopting a neutral tone without strong differentiation. Its perception leans on general recognition rather than specific quality attributes of running shoes.

Grok evenly distributes visibility (2.7%) across Asics, Salomon, Saucony, Adidas, Hoka, and New Balance, with a neutral-to-positive tone inferred from inclusion of running-focused sources like Fleet Feet. It prioritizes community-driven perspectives over standalone brand quality assessments.

Perplexity shows a slight favor toward Asics and Puma, each with a 2.7% visibility share, while Nike follows at 2.2%; its neutral sentiment suggests a balanced view on performance and innovation across brands.

ChatGPT strongly favors Asics and Nike, both at 8.8% visibility share, alongside Hoka, Saucony, and Brooks at 8%, with a positive sentiment reflecting their reputation for user comfort and cutting-edge technology in running shoes for 2025.

Deepseek leans toward Asics, Saucony, Adidas, and Hoka, each at 2.7% visibility share, with a neutral tone focusing on performance metrics and brand adoption among runners, indicating no clear standout for 2025.

Gemini equally favors Asics, Saucony, Adidas, Hoka, and Nike at 2.7% visibility share, maintaining a neutral sentiment that highlights widespread community acceptance and accessibility of these brands for running shoes in 2025.

Grok equally highlights Asics, Saucony, Adidas, Hoka, New Balance, Nike, and Brooks at 2.7% visibility share, with a positive sentiment emphasizing their strong ecosystem of innovation and runner trust for 2025.

ChatGPT equally prioritizes Nike and World Athletics with a 9.7% visibility share each, suggesting a balanced focus on the brand and the governing body responsible for race legality rules. Its neutral tone indicates a factual stance, likely affirming that Nike Vaporfly 3 complies with World Athletics' stack height and foam regulations.

Grok also assigns equal visibility to Nike and World Athletics at 2.7% each, reflecting a focus on the regulatory framework for determining race legality. Its neutral sentiment suggests a straightforward assessment that Nike Vaporfly 3 meets the necessary standards for competition.

Deepseek mirrors the trend with a 3.1% visibility share for both Nike and World Athletics, emphasizing the governing body's role in legality decisions. Its neutral tone implies confidence in Nike Vaporfly 3's compliance with current race regulations.

Gemini equally highlights Nike and World Athletics at 2.7% visibility each, indicating a focus on the regulatory context for race legality. Its neutral tone suggests a factual position that Nike Vaporfly 3 is likely race legal under existing standards.

Perplexity gives equal visibility to Nike and World Athletics at 2.7% each, pointing to the importance of regulatory compliance in assessing race legality. Its neutral sentiment leans toward affirming that Nike Vaporfly 3 aligns with competition rules, though it also notes other brands and contexts like Ironman (2.2%) which may hint at broader applicability concerns.