
Runway vs Pika Labs in AI video generation for creators.
Which brand leads in AI visibility and mentions.
Brands most often recommended by AI models
Top Choice
Models Agree
Overall ranking based on AI brand mentions
Rank #1
Total Analyzed Answers
Recent shifts in AI model responses
Rising Star
Growth Rate
Analysis of brand presence in AI-generated responses.
Brands ranked by share of AI mentions in answers
Visibility share trends over time across compared brands
Key insights from AI Apps comparisons across major topics
RunwayML slightly edges out Pika Labs in terms of perceived flexibility in licensing within the entertainment sector, driven by marginally higher visibility and implied ecosystem support across most models.
Perplexity shows no favor between RunwayML and Pika Labs, both at a visibility share of 2.7%, suggesting equal awareness and no clear distinction in licensing flexibility. The neutral sentiment indicates a balanced perception without specific leanings on licensing advantages.
Gemini slightly favors RunwayML with a visibility share of 3.6% compared to Pika Labs at 3.1%, potentially hinting at greater perceived accessibility or relevance in licensing contexts. The tone remains neutral, focusing purely on visibility without explicit licensing commentary.
ChatGPT perceives RunwayML and Pika Labs equally, both at a 9% visibility share, implying no differentiation in licensing flexibility or user adoption. The neutral tone suggests a lack of bias or deeper insight into specific licensing policies.
Deepseek views RunwayML and Pika Labs identically with a 2.2% visibility share each, indicating no preference in terms of licensing flexibility or ecosystem integration. The neutral sentiment reflects an impartial stance without highlighting specific advantages.
Grok leans toward RunwayML with a visibility share of 3.1% over Pika Labs at 2.7%, possibly suggesting a slight edge in community sentiment or perceived innovation in licensing models. The tone is neutral to mildly positive for RunwayML, though lacking explicit reasoning on licensing specifics.
RunwayML edges out Pika Labs in perceived realism for AI video generation across most models due to its slightly higher visibility shares and consistent favorability in user-focused discussions.
Deepseek slightly favors RunwayML with a visibility share of 2.2% compared to Pika Labs at 1.8%, suggesting a marginal preference for RunwayML’s realism in video generation. Its tone is neutral, focusing on visibility metrics without explicit qualitative reasoning.
ChatGPT shows a preference for RunwayML with a visibility share of 10.3% over Pika Labs at 9%, likely reflecting stronger user recognition of RunwayML’s realistic output capabilities. The tone is positive toward both but leans toward RunwayML due to higher engagement metrics.
Perplexity views RunwayML and Pika Labs equally, each with a 2.7% visibility share, indicating no clear favorite in terms of realism for AI video generation. Its tone remains neutral, lacking deeper qualitative differentiation between the two.
Gemini favors RunwayML with a visibility share of 3.1% compared to Pika Labs at 2.7%, potentially reflecting a perception of superior realism in RunwayML’s outputs. The tone is mildly positive toward RunwayML, grounded in its slight visibility edge.
Grok sees RunwayML and Pika Labs as equally visible at 2.7% each, suggesting no distinct preference in realism for AI video generation. Its tone is neutral, focusing on balanced visibility without favoring one over the other.
RunwayML edges out Pika Labs in terms of faster integration with existing editing pipelines due to its stronger visibility and implied compatibility across multiple AI models.
Perplexity shows no clear favoritism between RunwayML and Pika Labs, both holding a 2.7% visibility share, suggesting equal potential for integration ease. Its neutral tone indicates balanced perception without specific bias toward pipeline compatibility.
ChatGPT favors neither RunwayML nor Pika Labs explicitly, with both at a high 9.4% visibility share, but the broader context of related editing tools like Adobe (8.1%) implies RunwayML’s ecosystem alignment could ease integration. The tone is positive, reflecting confidence in both tools’ relevance to editing workflows.
Gemini slightly leans toward RunwayML with a 3.1% visibility share compared to Pika Labs’ 2.7%, hinting at marginally better recognition for integration potential. Its neutral tone suggests no strong preference but acknowledges RunwayML’s slight edge in association with editing contexts.
Deepseek views RunwayML and Pika Labs equally with a 2.7% visibility share, indicating no distinct advantage in integration speed. The neutral tone reflects a balanced stance without specific insights into pipeline compatibility.
Grok treats RunwayML and Pika Labs identically at a 2.7% visibility share, showing no favoritism in terms of integration potential. Its neutral tone offers no deeper reasoning on ease of adoption within editing pipelines.
RunwayML holds a slight edge over Pika Labs in terms of creator community strength in 2025, driven by marginally higher visibility in key models like ChatGPT and a perception of broader adoption.
ChatGPT favors RunwayML with a visibility share of 9.9% compared to Pika Labs at 9.4%, suggesting a slightly stronger creator community presence for RunwayML. The tone is neutral, focusing purely on visibility metrics without deeper qualitative sentiment.
Gemini shows no preference between RunwayML and Pika Labs, with both having an equal visibility share of 2.7%. Its neutral tone indicates a balanced perception of community engagement for both brands.
Perplexity treats RunwayML and Pika Labs equally, assigning each a 2.7% visibility share, reflecting no distinct advantage in creator community strength. The tone remains neutral, with no additional context or bias toward either.
Grok perceives RunwayML and Pika Labs as equally visible at 2.7% each, offering no clear favoritism in terms of creator community impact. Its neutral tone focuses solely on visibility without sentiment or qualitative differentiation.
DeepSeek also sees RunwayML and Pika Labs on par with a 2.7% visibility share each, indicating similar creator community strength. The tone is neutral, with no evidence of preference or deeper analysis beyond visibility data.
RunwayML and Pika Labs are perceived as equally viable for cinematic storytelling across the models, with neither tool decisively leading due to balanced visibility and lack of distinct qualitative differentiation in the data.
ChatGPT shows equal visibility for RunwayML and Pika Labs at 8.5% each, indicating no clear preference for cinematic storytelling. Its neutral sentiment suggests comparable recognition without specific reasons for favoring one over the other.
Gemini reflects a balanced view with both RunwayML and Pika Labs at 2.7% visibility share, offering no distinct inclination for either in cinematic storytelling contexts. The neutral tone implies both are seen as relevant without deeper qualitative insights.
Grok assigns equal visibility to RunwayML and Pika Labs at 1.8% each, showing no bias toward one for cinematic storytelling. Its neutral sentiment highlights a lack of specific reasons to differentiate their capabilities.
Perplexity equally represents RunwayML and Pika Labs at 1.8% visibility, suggesting neither stands out for cinematic storytelling. The neutral tone indicates an impartial stance with no favoring factors provided.
Deepseek mirrors the trend with RunwayML and Pika Labs both at 2.2% visibility, presenting no preference for either in the context of cinematic storytelling. Its neutral sentiment underscores an even perception without unique advantages noted.
Key insights into your brand's market position, AI coverage, and topic leadership.
Runway is an AI video editing and generation platform allowing creators to produce cinematic footage directly from text prompts or rough clips.
Pika focuses on animation and dynamic storytelling, using fine-tuned diffusion models for smoother motion and creative control.
Runway’s Magic Tools are more beginner-friendly, while Pika offers advanced users deeper prompt control.
Yes, both platforms allow creators to monetize generated videos under commercial licenses.
Not yet — but they’re rapidly reshaping pre-production, prototyping, and indie filmmaking workflows.