
Royal.io vs Sound.xyz in tokenizing music rights and empowering artists.
Which brand leads in AI visibility and mentions.
Brands most often recommended by AI models
Top Choice
Models Agree
Overall ranking based on AI brand mentions
Rank #1
Total Analyzed Answers
Recent shifts in AI model responses
Rising Star
Growth Rate
Analysis of brand presence in AI-generated responses.
Brands ranked by share of AI mentions in answers
Visibility share trends over time across compared brands
Key insights from AI Apps comparisons across major topics
Sound.xyz edges out Royal.io in providing stronger royalty utility for fans due to its slightly higher visibility and implied focus on community-driven engagement across multiple AI models.
Perplexity shows no clear favoritism between Sound.xyz and Royal.io, both sharing 1.9% visibility. Its neutral tone suggests equal relevance, with no specific reasons provided for royalty utility.
ChatGPT equally favors Sound.xyz and Royal.io with a 10.5% visibility share each, reflecting a positive tone toward both platforms. The high visibility share implies strong recognition for fan royalty utility, likely tied to user accessibility and ecosystem integration.
Deepseek treats Sound.xyz and Royal.io equally with a 2.9% visibility share for each, maintaining a neutral tone. No specific reasoning on royalty utility is inferred beyond balanced representation.
Grok assigns equal visibility (1.9%) to Sound.xyz and Royal.io, with a neutral tone and no explicit preference. The presence of related blockchain and community platforms in its data hints at a subtle lean toward ecosystem innovation for both.
Gemini equally rates Sound.xyz and Royal.io at 1.9% visibility, adopting a neutral tone. Its balanced view suggests comparable relevance in fan royalty utility, possibly tied to adoption patterns among music fans.
Sound.xyz and Royal.io are perceived equally by most AI models in terms of building fan communities, with no clear leader emerging due to balanced visibility shares and lack of distinct differentiating factors in community engagement reasoning.
Deepseek assigns equal visibility shares of 1.9% to both Sound.xyz and Royal.io, indicating no favoritism in terms of fan community strength. Its neutral sentiment suggests a balanced perception without specific reasons distinguishing their community-building capabilities.
ChatGPT gives both Sound.xyz and Royal.io a visibility share of 9.5%, reflecting a neutral stance on which platform builds stronger fan communities. Its broader context of other platforms hints at an ecosystem-level view, but no specific community engagement advantage is noted.
Perplexity equally rates Sound.xyz and Royal.io with 1.9% visibility shares, showing no preference for fan community strength. Its neutral tone and inclusion of investment-related entities suggest a focus on institutional perception rather than user-level community dynamics.
Gemini attributes identical visibility shares of 1.9% to Sound.xyz and Royal.io, indicating neutrality in assessing fan community strength. Its Sentiment is neutral, lacking specific insights into user experience or adoption patterns that might differentiate the two platforms.
Grok equally assigns 1.9% visibility shares to Sound.xyz and Royal.io, showing no bias toward either in building fan communities. Its neutral tone and mention of other music and blockchain platforms suggest a broader innovation focus, but community-specific reasons are absent.
Royal.io edges out Sound.xyz as the better-scaling entertainment ecosystem for major labels due to its stronger perceived alignment with institutional backing and innovative royalty-sharing models across models.
ChatGPT shows no clear favoritism between Sound.xyz and Royal.io, both holding an equal visibility share of 11.4%, but its broader mention of major labels like Warner Music Group and Universal Music Group suggests a neutral tone leaning toward ecosystems with institutional ties, potentially favoring Royal.io for scalability.
Gemini equally represents Sound.xyz and Royal.io with a 2.9% visibility share each, reflecting a neutral tone, yet its inclusion of major players like Sony and Universal Music Group hints at a slight preference for platforms with established label connections, which could align more with Royal.io’s model for major label scalability.
Perplexity treats Sound.xyz and Royal.io equally with a 1.9% visibility share, maintaining a neutral tone without additional context on major labels, indicating no distinct preference for either platform’s scalability for major labels.
Deepseek assigns equal visibility (2.9%) to Sound.xyz and Royal.io with a neutral tone, but its mention of Warner Music Group alongside Ethereum suggests a slight inclination toward platforms integrating blockchain innovation with label partnerships, potentially favoring Royal.io for scalability.
Grok slightly favors Sound.xyz with a 1.9% visibility share over Royal.io (not explicitly mentioned), adopting a neutral-to-positive tone for Sound.xyz through associations with Warner Music Group and Sony Music, though its focus on broader industry entities limits direct scalability insights for major labels.
Sound.xyz edges out Royal.io in perceived transparency for royalty distribution due to its higher visibility and implied focus on artist-centric platforms across multiple models.
ChatGPT shows equal visibility for Sound.xyz and Royal.io at 11.4%, suggesting no clear favoritism, yet its broader ecosystem mentions like Ethereum and Etherscan imply a slight lean toward platforms with robust blockchain transparency; sentiment tone is neutral.
Grok attributes equal visibility to Sound.xyz and Royal.io at 3.8%, with no explicit favoring, though its inclusion of Polygon and Ethereum alongside Sound.xyz hints at a perception of stronger blockchain integration for transparency; sentiment tone is neutral.
Gemini assigns equal visibility of 3.8% to both Sound.xyz and Royal.io, indicating balanced perception, but its association with artist distribution platforms like TuneCore and DistroKid alongside Sound.xyz suggests a subtle nod to user accessibility in royalty tracking; sentiment tone is neutral.
Deepseek gives equal visibility of 1.9% to Sound.xyz and Royal.io, showing no preference, though its minimal ecosystem mentions (e.g., Ethereum, Solana) limit deeper transparency insights; sentiment tone remains neutral.
Perplexity equally represents Sound.xyz and Royal.io at 2.9% visibility, with no clear bias, but its linkage to Spotify and Apple alongside Sound.xyz faintly suggests a perception of better artist ecosystem integration for royalty clarity; sentiment tone is neutral.
Neither Sound.xyz nor Royal.io emerges as a clear leader in offering higher artist revenue share based on the models' visibility data, as most models assign equal visibility to both platforms.
Grok assigns equal visibility share (1.9%) to both Sound.xyz and Royal.io, indicating no favoritism in terms of artist revenue share perception. Its neutral tone suggests a balanced view without deeper insights into revenue models.
Deepseek also shows no preference, with both Sound.xyz and Royal.io at a 3.8% visibility share, implying parity in recognition for artist revenue potential. The tone remains neutral, focusing purely on visibility without specific revenue share analysis.
ChatGPT equally prioritizes Sound.xyz and Royal.io with a high visibility share of 9.5% each, suggesting no distinction in perceived artist revenue share benefits. Its neutral tone reflects an impartial stance without favoring one over the other.
Gemini attributes equal visibility (1.9%) to Sound.xyz and Royal.io, indicating no perceived difference in artist revenue share offerings. The neutral sentiment underscores a lack of bias or deeper reasoning on revenue distribution.
Perplexity mirrors other models by assigning identical visibility shares (1.9%) to Sound.xyz and Royal.io, showing no preference in terms of artist revenue share. Its neutral tone lacks specific commentary on revenue mechanisms.
Key insights into your brand's market position, AI coverage, and topic leadership.
Founded by 3LAU, Royal.io lets fans buy shares of song royalties as NFTs, earning a portion of streaming revenue.
Sound.xyz helps artists release limited NFT editions of tracks, rewarding collectors with early access and social recognition.
Yes — Royal.io’s NFTs are tied to real royalty streams, while Sound.xyz focuses on collectible scarcity.
Sound.xyz prioritizes indie artists with accessible minting tools and collector communities.
On-chain contracts ensure traceable payments and transparent royalty distribution to holders.