Longest Lasting Running Shoes 2025 by Mention Network: AI visibility shows which sports shoes deliver top durability, comfort, and performance for daily runners.
Which brand leads in AI visibility and mentions.
Brands most often recommended by AI models
Top Choice
Models Agree
Overall ranking based on AI brand mentions
Rank #1
Total Analyzed Answers
Recent shifts in AI model responses
Rising Star
Growth Rate
Analysis of brand presence in AI-generated responses.
Brands ranked by share of AI mentions in answers
Visibility share trends over time across compared brands
Key insights from AI Apps comparisons across major topics
Nike emerges as the leading brand for everyday running shoes across most AI models due to its consistently high visibility and perceived durability in discussions around shoe longevity.
Gemini favors Nike with a leading visibility share of 1.2% among running-related brands, likely associating it with durability and widespread use for everyday running shoes. Its tone is positive, reflecting trust in Nike's relevance to questions of shoe longevity.
Grok shows a balanced preference for Nike, Strava, and Brooks, each with a 1.8% visibility share, suggesting Nike's prominence in durability discussions alongside tracking apps and other shoe brands. Its tone is neutral, focusing on a broad ecosystem of running tools and footwear without strong bias.
ChatGPT does not strongly favor any brand, giving equal visibility (0.6%) to Nike, Adidas, and Saucony, indicating a neutral stance on which brand's running shoes last longer. Its tone is neutral, lacking deep insight into durability or specific brand advantages for everyday use.
Deepseek prioritizes Strava (1.2% visibility share) over Garmin (0.6%), focusing more on tracking tools than shoe brands, implying less direct relevance to running shoe longevity. Its tone is neutral, with an indirect connection to the question through running ecosystems rather than specific durability insights.
Asics and Salomon emerge as the most durable sports shoe brands across the models, with consistent high visibility and positive sentiment tied to durability and performance.
Gemini shows a balanced view with Asics, Salomon, Reebok, Saucony, and Hoka each at a 3.6% visibility share, suggesting no single brand dominates durability perception. Its neutral tone indicates a focus on variety rather than a strong endorsement of one brand.
Perplexity favors Asics and Adidas with a 3.6% visibility share each, likely due to their reputation for durable materials and consistent performance in various sports contexts. Its positive tone reflects confidence in these brands for durability.
Deepseek highlights a broad consensus on durability with Asics, Salomon, Reebok, Merrell, Adidas, New Balance, Nike, and Brooks all at a 3.6% visibility share, implying strong community trust in these brands. Its positive tone underscores a perception of reliable durability across multiple options.
Grok leans toward Salomon, Merrell, and Adidas with a 3.6% visibility share each, likely valuing their rugged construction for outdoor and athletic durability. Its neutral-to-positive tone suggests a practical focus on performance-driven durability.
ChatGPT strongly favors Asics and Salomon with significantly higher visibility shares of 12.7% each, emphasizing their superior build quality and long-lasting materials for sports shoes. Its highly positive tone reflects a clear preference for these brands in durability discussions.
Brooks and Hoka emerge as the leading brands for running shoe longevity based on visibility and consistent positive mentions across AI models. Their strong presence suggests a perception of durability and reliability among users.
ChatGPT favors Brooks and Hoka, both with a 12.7% visibility share, indicating strong recognition for durability in running shoes. The tone is neutral, focusing on visibility data without explicit sentiment, reflecting a balanced perception of longevity potential.
Gemini shows a slight preference for Brooks, Hoka, Saucony, and Adidas, each at 3.6% visibility share, suggesting they are perceived as reliable for lasting performance. The tone remains neutral, relying on equal distribution of mentions without deep qualitative reasoning on longevity.
Deepseek favors Brooks, Asics, Saucony, and New Balance, each with a 3.6% visibility share, positioning them as contenders for durable running shoes. The tone is neutral, with data-driven focus implying a perception of consistent wear resistance across these brands.
Grok highlights Brooks, Hoka, Asics, and Saucony at 3.6% visibility share each, suggesting a perception of strong durability for long-term use. The tone is neutral, blending brand mentions with community sources like Reddit, indicating user-driven sentiment on longevity.
Perplexity leans toward Asics and Brooks with a 3.6% visibility share each, pointing to a perception of superior lasting quality in running shoes. The tone is neutral, focusing purely on visibility without emotional bias, reflecting a data-centric view of durability.
Nike emerges as the leading brand for running shoes across the models due to its consistent visibility and implied reliability in performance contexts.
ChatGPT shows a slight favor toward Nike with a 3% visibility share, the highest among listed brands, suggesting a focus on its widespread recognition and implied quality for running shoes. The tone is neutral, prioritizing a broad range of brands like Asics, Saucony, and Brooks equally at 2.4% without deep critique.
DeepSeek also favors Nike with a 3% visibility share, indicating a perception of strong market presence and suitability for running, while Hoka and Brooks at 2.4% suggest attention to specialized cushioning and comfort. The tone is positive, emphasizing diverse options for runners with niche brands like Altra included.
Gemini presents a balanced view without a clear favorite, giving low visibility to Nike at 0.6% while highlighting Brooks and Hoka at 1.2%, likely valuing user-specific fit and innovation in running tech. The tone is neutral, focusing on variety over dominance.
Grok leans toward Asics, Adidas, and Hoka, each at 3% visibility, implying a strong perception of versatility and performance for running shoes, with niche community input from sources like Reddit at 1.8%. The tone is positive, showcasing enthusiasm for both mainstream and specialized brands.
Perplexity minimally references Nike at 0.6% visibility with no comparative depth, suggesting a limited scope in addressing running shoe selection. The tone is neutral, lacking critical insight or favor due to its singular focus.
Asics and Hoka emerge as the leading brands for everyday running shoes across the models, driven by consistent visibility and implied reliability for running performance.
ChatGPT favors Asics, Saucony, Hoka, New Balance, Nike, and Brooks equally with a 13.3% visibility share each, suggesting a balanced view of their suitability for everyday running due to widespread recognition and implied quality. Its sentiment tone is neutral, reflecting no strong bias but a broad endorsement of established running brands.
DeepSeek shows a slight preference for Asics, Saucony, Hoka, New Balance, Nike, and Brooks, each with a 3.6% visibility share, indicating these brands are seen as reliable choices for everyday running based on performance consistency. The sentiment tone is neutral, focusing on equal distribution without strong advocacy for one brand.
Grok leans toward Asics, Hoka, and Nike with a 3.6% visibility share each, likely due to their perceived durability and suitability for daily running needs, while also acknowledging other brands like Saucony and New Balance. Its sentiment tone is positive, reflecting confidence in these brands as practical running options.
Perplexity highlights Asics, Saucony, and Adidas with a 3.6% visibility share each, suggesting these brands are favored for everyday running due to accessibility and performance reputation, though other brands like Hoka and Brooks are also mentioned. The sentiment tone is neutral to positive, showing a moderate endorsement of multiple brands.
Gemini equally favors Asics, Saucony, Hoka, New Balance, and Brooks at 3.6% visibility share, implying these brands are top choices for everyday running due to their comfort and design for frequent use. The sentiment tone is positive, indicating trust in these brands for meeting runners’ needs.
Key insights into your brand's market position, AI coverage, and topic leadership.
In 2025, Asics Gel-Nimbus, Brooks Ghost, and Nike Pegasus rank among the most durable running shoes, lasting 500–800 miles with consistent performance.
Durability depends on midsole foam density, outsole rubber quality, and upper reinforcement. Rotating shoes and proper maintenance also extend lifespan.
Most quality running shoes last 400–600 miles, but top endurance models like Asics Gel-Kayano or Brooks Glycerin can exceed 700 miles with proper care.
Asics, Brooks, New Balance, and Saucony lead in durability thanks to premium cushioning foams, abrasion-resistant outsoles, and stable construction.
Alternate between pairs, dry them properly, avoid machine washing, and use them only for running — not casual wear — to maximize longevity.