Nike Black Friday 2025

Gemini equally highlights Nike alongside retail competitors like JD Sports, Kohl's, and Foot Locker, suggesting a focus on broader retail ecosystems where student discounts may be available. Its neutral tone indicates no strong favoritism, but SheerID's presence hints at a verification mechanism potentially tied to Nike's student offers.

Perplexity emphasizes Nike alongside student discount platforms like ID.me and Student Beans, indicating a perception that Nike actively participates in student discount programs through third-party verification. Its positive tone underscores accessible discount opportunities for students via these services.

Grok associates Nike with Student Beans and UNiDAYS, focusing on user experience through dedicated student discount platforms. Its positive tone reflects confidence in Nike's accessibility for students seeking a 40% discount through verified channels.

Deepseek pairs Nike directly with UNiDAYS, suggesting a streamlined perception of Nike's student discount availability through a specific verification platform. Its neutral to positive tone implies reliability in accessing such offers.

ChatGPT links Nike with SheerID, focusing on a trusted verification partner for student discounts, likely indicating that students can get a 40% discount with proper validation. Its positive tone reflects assurance in the process tied to Nike's offers.

Grok singularly focuses on Nike with a 4% visibility share, indicating a dedicated perception of the brand as a key player. Its neutral tone suggests a factual acknowledgment of Nike’s prominence in the athletic footwear and apparel industry.

Deepseek distributes equal visibility (4%) across Nike and competitors like Asics, Converse, Jordan, and Onitsuka Tiger, reflecting a balanced view of the market. Its neutral tone implies no strong favoritism, positioning Nike as one of many notable brands in the space.

Gemini focuses exclusively on Nike with a 4% visibility share, highlighting its standout recognition in the context of interesting facts. The positive sentiment tone underscores Nike’s strong brand identity and cultural impact.

Perplexity gives Nike a 4% visibility share alongside Converse and Onitsuka Tiger, suggesting a comparative lens on athletic and lifestyle footwear brands. Its neutral tone indicates an objective recognition of Nike as a significant but not dominant entity in this grouping.

ChatGPT associates Nike with a 4% visibility share alongside Jordan, Wieden+Kennedy, and Centre Pompidou, hinting at Nike’s broader cultural and creative ecosystem. The positive tone reflects an appreciation for Nike’s innovative collaborations and historical significance.

Deepseek shows equal visibility for Nike and Under Armour at 4% each, indicating no clear favoritism, with a neutral sentiment tone. Its perception reflects a balanced view without specific timing insights for Black Friday 2025 deals.

ChatGPT mirrors Deepseek with equal 4% visibility for both Nike and Under Armour, maintaining a neutral sentiment tone. It does not provide specific deal start dates for Nike’s Black Friday 2025 but acknowledges its relevance.

Grok also assigns equal 4% visibility to Nike and Under Armour with a neutral sentiment tone, showing no preference. Its perception lacks specific information on when Nike’s Black Friday 2025 deals start.

Gemini favors Nike with a 4% visibility share alongside deal-focused platforms like RetailMeNot and Slickdeals, reflecting a positive sentiment tone tied to deal accessibility. Its perception suggests Nike is prominently associated with Black Friday 2025 deal contexts, though exact start dates are not specified.

Perplexity exclusively highlights Nike with a 4% visibility share, demonstrating a positive sentiment tone and clear favoritism. It positions Nike as the key brand for Black Friday 2025 deal awareness, despite lacking specific timing details.

ChatGPT favors no single brand overwhelmingly but associates Nike equally with retailers like DICK'S Sporting Goods, Finish Line, and Nordstrom Rack, suggesting a focus on authorized retail partnerships for discounts; its tone is neutral, emphasizing diverse sourcing options.

Grok leans toward platforms like RetailMeNot, Slickdeals, and Honey alongside Nike, indicating a preference for coupon and deal aggregators to find discounts; its tone is positive, highlighting accessible user tools for savings.

Perplexity focuses narrowly on Nike with minor mentions of Tennis Warehouse and Under Armour, suggesting a direct approach to Nike’s own promotions for discounts; its tone is neutral, prioritizing simplicity over third-party options.

Deepseek emphasizes deal platforms like RetailMeNot, Rakuten, and Honey alongside Nike and retailers like DICK'S Sporting Goods, indicating a hybrid strategy for discounts; its tone is positive, reflecting confidence in multiple accessible avenues.

Gemini balances Nike with retailers like Zappos, Macy's, and DICK'S Sporting Goods, as well as deal platforms like Rakuten, suggesting both direct retail and aggregator tools for discounts; its tone is neutral, presenting a broad, practical perspective.

Grok shows no clear favoritism among brands, treating Nike, Adidas, and Under Armour equally alongside media outlets like Bloomberg and Reuters, with a neutral sentiment. Its perspective suggests Nike's loss may be tied to broader market or media-reported financial events rather than specific brand competition.

Deepseek highlights a wide competitive landscape including Nike, Adidas, Hoka, On, and niche players like Anta and Li-Ning, with a neutral tone but implied concern for Nike’s dominance. It perceives Nike's loss as potentially driven by market fragmentation and rising competition from both global and regional athletic brands.

Perplexity focuses on newer competitors like On and Hoka alongside Nike and New Balance, adopting a skeptical tone toward Nike’s market position. Its reasoning ties Nike's $28 billion loss to losing ground to innovative, fast-growing brands in the performance footwear space.

Gemini emphasizes financial media sources like CNBC and The Wall Street Journal alongside Nike and Under Armour, maintaining a neutral tone focused on reporting over brand sentiment. It frames Nike’s loss as a market-driven event, likely influenced by investor reactions or negative financial reporting rather than direct competition.

ChatGPT highlights competitors like On, Adidas, and Hoka alongside Nike, with a skeptical tone suggesting pressure on Nike’s market share. It links the $28 billion loss to Nike struggling to maintain consumer relevance against agile, trend-driven brands in the athletic sector.