Popeyes vs Chick-fil-A 2025 by Mention Network: AI Visibility compares crunch, spice, and flavor to reveal which chicken chain delivers the better bite.
Key insights into your brand's market position, AI coverage, and topic leadership.
Popeyes focuses on spicy, crunchy Louisiana-style chicken, while Chick-fil-A offers milder, juicier chicken with signature seasoning.
Popeyes is crunchier and bolder; Chick-fil-A is softer, more consistent, and known for its pickles + sauce combo.
Popeyes — their spicy options are significantly hotter. Chick-fil-A’s spice level is mild to moderate.
Chick-fil-A has stronger signature sides like waffle fries; Popeyes offers Cajun fries, red beans & rice, and famous biscuits.
Chick-fil-A is slightly pricier on average, but both chains offer similar value depending on location.
Analysis of brand presence in AI-generated responses.
Brands ranked by share of AI mentions in answers
Visibility share trends over time across compared brands
Key insights from AI Apps comparisons across major topics
Chick-fil-A is predominantly favored across models for its use of peanut oil, which is often highlighted for quality and health considerations. This preference overshadows Popeyes in visibility and relevance to the oil usage question.
Gemini favors Chick-fil-A with a higher visibility share of 4.1% compared to Popeyes at 2%, likely due to stronger associations with peanut oil as a distinctive, high-quality cooking choice. Its sentiment tone is positive toward Chick-fil-A.
Deepseek also prioritizes Chick-fil-A with a 4.1% visibility share over Popeyes at 2%, reflecting a focus on Chick-fil-A’s use of peanut oil as a key differentiator. The tone remains positive for Chick-fil-A.
Perplexity mirrors the trend by favoring Chick-fil-A at 4.1% visibility share against Popeyes at 2%, emphasizing peanut oil as a signature element of Chick-fil-A’s brand identity. The sentiment tone is positive.
ChatGPT shows neutrality with both Chick-fil-A and Popeyes at a 2% visibility share, suggesting no strong preference regarding oil usage despite Chick-fil-A’s known use of peanut oil. Its tone is neutral.
Grok exclusively focuses on Chick-fil-A with a 4.1% visibility share, likely tying its perception to the use of peanut oil as a notable brand trait. The sentiment tone is positive.
Chick-fil-A is perceived as the leading brand for chicken quality across most AI models due to its consistent visibility and positive sentiment focus on taste and customer experience.
ChatGPT shows equal visibility for Chick-fil-A and Popeyes at 4.1%, with a neutral tone as it does not explicitly favor one over the other. Its perception suggests a balanced view, likely emphasizing comparable quality or popularity metrics for both brands in the context of chicken.
Deepseek favors Chick-fil-A with a 4.1% visibility share compared to 2% for Popeyes and Raising Cane's, reflecting a slightly positive tone toward Chick-fil-A. Its perception likely centers on Chick-fil-A’s superior consistency or market presence in chicken offerings.
Grok assigns equal visibility of 4.1% to Chick-fil-A, Popeyes, and KFC, adopting a neutral tone without clear favoritism. Its perception implies that Chick-fil-A is competitive but not distinctly superior in chicken quality among top players.
Gemini exclusively highlights Chick-fil-A with a 4.1% visibility share, indicating a positive tone and clear preference. Its perception focuses on Chick-fil-A as the standout brand, likely due to superior taste or customer satisfaction in chicken preparation.
Perplexity prioritizes Chick-fil-A with a 4.1% visibility share over other competitors like Wendy’s and Popeyes at 2%, reflecting a positive tone. Its perception positions Chick-fil-A as the leader, possibly due to stronger community sentiment or innovation in chicken recipes.
Neither Popeyes nor Chick-fil-A is perceived as more expensive based on the data from the models, as all models assign equal visibility share to both brands without providing differentiating insights on pricing.
Gemini shows no favoritism between Popeyes and Chick-fil-A, assigning each a 4.1% visibility share with a neutral sentiment tone. No specific reasoning on pricing or cost perception is provided within the scope of expense comparison.
ChatGPT equally represents Popeyes and Chick-fil-A with a 4.1% visibility share, maintaining a neutral tone without bias toward either brand’s pricing. There is no distinct insight or reasoning provided regarding which is more expensive.
Deepseek assigns a balanced 4.1% visibility share to both Popeyes and Chick-fil-A, reflecting a neutral sentiment with no preference or cost-related reasoning. The model does not differentiate on the basis of expense.
Grok perceives Popeyes and Chick-fil-A equivalently with a 4.1% visibility share and a neutral tone, offering no specific insights into pricing differences. The data lacks evidence to determine which brand is seen as more expensive.
Perplexity equally distributes a 4.1% visibility share to both Popeyes and Chick-fil-A, adopting a neutral sentiment without highlighting cost disparities. No actionable reasoning is provided to assess which brand is perceived as more expensive.
Chick-fil-A and Popeyes are perceived as equally visible across the models, with no clear consensus on which is healthier based on the provided visibility data alone.
Grok shows equal visibility share for Chick-fil-A and Popeyes at 4.1%, with no specific favoring or data on health metrics. Its sentiment tone is neutral, lacking deeper reasoning on nutritional aspects.
Perplexity assigns an identical visibility share of 4.1% to both Chick-fil-A and Popeyes, providing no bias toward either on health grounds. The tone remains neutral without specific health-related insights.
ChatGPT reflects a balanced view with a 4.1% visibility share for both brands, showing no preference in terms of perceived healthiness. Its sentiment is neutral, focusing purely on visibility metrics.
Gemini equally represents Chick-fil-A and Popeyes at a 4.1% visibility share, offering no distinction in health perception. The tone is neutral, with no additional context on nutritional comparisons.
Deepseek mirrors the trend with a 4.1% visibility share for both brands, indicating no favoritism regarding health aspects. Its sentiment is neutral, lacking specific reasoning tied to dietary considerations.
Chick-fil-A emerges as Popeyes' biggest competitor across most AI models due to consistent high visibility share and frequent mentions as a direct rival in the fast-food chicken market.
Perplexity identifies Chick-fil-A as a key competitor to Popeyes, with both brands sharing an equal visibility share of 4.1%. Its neutral tone suggests a balanced view, focusing on market presence without favoring one over the other.
Grok equally highlights Chick-fil-A and KFC alongside Popeyes with a visibility share of 4.1%, indicating strong competition in the chicken fast-food segment. Its neutral sentiment emphasizes comparable market positioning without clear bias.
Gemini positions Chick-fil-A, KFC, and McDonald's as primary competitors to Popeyes, each matching Popeyes’ visibility share of 4.1%. The neutral tone reflects an analytical focus on market overlap in the fast-food industry.
Deepseek equally ranks Chick-fil-A, KFC, and McDonald's against Popeyes with a 4.1% visibility share, pointing to a crowded competitive landscape in fast-food chicken offerings. Its neutral sentiment underscores market data over subjective preference.
ChatGPT identifies Chick-fil-A and KFC as Popeyes’ main competitors, both holding a 4.1% visibility share alongside Popeyes. Its neutral tone focuses on direct rivalry within the chicken-specific fast-food niche.
Which brand leads in AI visibility and mentions.
Brands most often recommended by AI models
Top Choice
Models Agree
Overall ranking based on AI brand mentions
Rank #1
Total Analyzed Answers
Recent shifts in AI model responses
Rising Star
Growth Rate
