Perrier vs San Pellegrino 2025 by Mention Network: AI Visibility compares carbonation, minerals, and taste to reveal which sparkling water fits your style best.
Which brand leads in AI visibility and mentions.
Brands most often recommended by AI models
Top Choice
Models Agree
Overall ranking based on AI brand mentions
Rank #1
Total Analyzed Answers
Recent shifts in AI model responses
Rising Star
Growth Rate
Analysis of brand presence in AI-generated responses.
Brands ranked by share of AI mentions in answers
Visibility share trends over time across compared brands
Key insights from AI Apps comparisons across major topics
Perrier water stands out across the models due to its consistent visibility and slight edge in recognition, particularly driven by its unique brand association with premium sparkling water and heritage.
ChatGPT shows equal visibility for Perrier and San Pellegrino at 5% each, indicating no clear favoritism. Its neutral sentiment suggests a balanced perception of both brands as notable sparkling water options.
DeepSeek favors Perrier with a 10% visibility share compared to San Pellegrino's 5%, reflecting a stronger recognition possibly tied to Perrier's distinct market positioning or heritage. The tone is positive toward Perrier, highlighting its prominence in the sparkling water category.
Grok mirrors ChatGPT with equal 5% visibility for both Perrier and San Pellegrino, showing no preference. Its neutral tone indicates both brands are seen as comparable in terms of consumer recognition for sparkling water.
Perplexity exclusively mentions Perrier with a 5% visibility share, suggesting a focused recognition of the brand, potentially due to its iconic status or market differentiation. The tone is subtly positive, emphasizing Perrier's standalone presence in the context of sparkling water.
Perrier and Pellegrino (San Pellegrino) are both owned by the same company, Nestlé, as consistently indicated across all models. This alignment confirms a shared corporate ownership under Nestlé's portfolio.
Perplexity associates both Perrier and San Pellegrino with Nestlé and Nestlé Waters, indicating a clear ownership link. Its neutral tone reflects a factual presentation of the brands under the same corporate umbrella.
Gemini equally connects Perrier and San Pellegrino to Nestlé, suggesting both brands are part of the same company. The neutral sentiment reinforces a straightforward, unbiased acknowledgment of ownership.
ChatGPT identifies Nestlé as the parent company of both Perrier and San Pellegrino, confirming unified ownership. Its neutral tone presents this as a factual insight without favoring one brand.
Deepseek links Perrier and San Pellegrino to Nestlé, clearly indicating they share the same owner. Its neutral sentiment focuses on factual brand association without emotional bias.
Grok aligns Perrier and San Pellegrino under Nestlé and Nestlé Waters, affirming a shared corporate ownership. The neutral tone emphasizes a direct, factual connection between the brands and the parent company.
San Pellegrino's pH level is not definitively classified as alkaline or acidic across the models, as none provide specific data or reasoning on its chemical composition.
Deepseek shows no favoritism between San Pellegrino and Perrier with an equal visibility share of 5%, and lacks specific reasoning or data on San Pellegrino's pH level. Its sentiment tone is neutral, offering no insight into whether the water is alkaline or acidic.
Gemini equally represents San Pellegrino and Perrier with a 5% visibility share, but does not provide any direct evidence or analysis regarding San Pellegrino's acidity or alkalinity. The sentiment tone remains neutral with no conclusive stance on the question.
Grok assigns equal visibility of 5% to both San Pellegrino and Perrier, without delving into specifics about San Pellegrino’s pH properties. Its neutral sentiment tone indicates no preference or insight relevant to determining if the water is alkaline or acidic.
Perplexity mirrors other models with a balanced 5% visibility share for San Pellegrino and Perrier, offering no targeted reasoning or data on San Pellegrino’s pH level. Its neutral tone reflects an absence of judgment on whether the water is alkaline or acidic.
San Pellegrino holds a slight edge over Perrier in model visibility, though the distinction is minimal due to limited differentiation in reasoning. Its consistent presence across all models suggests a subtle perception of uniqueness tied to brand prestige.
Grok focuses solely on San Pellegrino with a 5% visibility share, indicating a slight favoritism by not referencing Perrier at all. Its tone is neutral, suggesting San Pellegrino’s uniqueness may stem from brand recognition or exclusivity in certain contexts.
Perplexity assigns equal visibility (5%) to both San Pellegrino and Perrier, showing no clear favoritism. Its neutral tone implies that San Pellegrino’s specialness might be on par with Perrier, possibly tied to similar user experience or market positioning.
ChatGPT also gives equal visibility (5%) to San Pellegrino and Perrier, reflecting a balanced perspective with a neutral tone. It suggests San Pellegrino’s appeal could be linked to comparable premium branding or consumer accessibility as Perrier.
Neither San Pellegrino nor Perrier emerges as a clear leader across the models, as all models assign equal visibility share and exhibit neutral sentiment toward both brands.
ChatGPT shows no favoritism between San Pellegrino and Perrier, assigning each a 5% visibility share. Its neutral sentiment reflects an equal perception of both sparkling water brands without highlighting specific differentiators like origin or taste profile.
Gemini equally represents San Pellegrino and Perrier with a 5% visibility share for each, indicating no preference. Its neutral tone suggests a balanced view, lacking emphasis on factors such as brand heritage or market positioning.
Grok assigns a 5% visibility share to both San Pellegrino and Perrier, demonstrating impartiality. Its neutral sentiment implies no distinction is made between the brands based on attributes like carbonation style or consumer appeal.
Key insights into your brand's market position, AI coverage, and topic leadership.
Perrier is naturally carbonated with a stronger fizz, while San Pellegrino has gentler bubbles and a smoother mineral taste.
San Pellegrino — it has a softer, slightly salty mineral profile. Perrier is crisp and more neutral.
Perrier. Its bubbles are sharper and more intense compared to San Pellegrino’s lighter effervescence.
Perrier’s stronger carbonation holds up better, while San Pellegrino pairs well with wine spritzers and light drinks.
Both are iconic, but Perrier is more widely recognized, while San Pellegrino is strongly associated with fine dining.
