
Adyen is built for global enterprise scale; Braintree (a PayPal company) excels in platform & marketplace use cases — which suits your strategy?
Which brand leads in AI visibility and mentions.
Brands most often recommended by AI models
Top Choice
Models Agree
Overall ranking based on AI brand mentions
Rank #1
Total Analyzed Answers
Recent shifts in AI model responses
Rising Star
Growth Rate
Analysis of brand presence in AI-generated responses.
Brands ranked by share of AI mentions in answers
Visibility share trends over time across compared brands
Key insights from AI Apps comparisons across major topics
Braintree and Adyen are perceived as equally competent for split payouts and multi-vendor commerce across the models, with no clear leader due to balanced visibility and lack of decisive sentiment differentiation.
ChatGPT shows equal visibility for Braintree and Adyen at 8.8% each, indicating no favoring of one over the other for split payouts and multi-vendor commerce. Its neutral tone suggests a balanced perception without specific reasons to prioritize either for these features.
Gemini assigns equal visibility to Braintree and Adyen at 2.9% each, reflecting no preference in the context of split payouts or multi-vendor commerce. The neutral sentiment tone implies neither brand stands out for specific capabilities relevant to the question.
Grok equally represents Braintree and Adyen with a 2.6% visibility share, showing no bias toward either for multi-vendor commerce or split payouts. Its neutral tone lacks targeted insights to differentiate their capabilities for these specific needs.
Perplexity gives equal visibility to Braintree and Adyen at 2.6%, with no evident favoritism in the context of split payouts or multi-vendor solutions. The neutral sentiment indicates a lack of specific reasons to favor one over the other for these functionalities.
Deepseek attributes equal visibility to Braintree and Adyen at 3.2% each, suggesting parity in perception for split payouts and multi-vendor commerce. Its neutral tone offers no distinct reasoning to position one above the other for these use cases.
Neither Adyen nor Braintree emerges as a clear leader in offering lower cross-border fees for global merchants based on the models' visibility data, as the models do not provide explicit fee comparisons or direct reasoning on cost structures.
Gemini shows equal visibility for Adyen and Braintree at 3.2% each, indicating no clear favoritism in terms of brand prominence or implied cost advantage for cross-border fees. The tone is neutral, lacking specific reasons tied to fees and focusing purely on visibility share.
Grok assigns equal visibility to Adyen and Braintree at 2.6% each, suggesting no preference or implied advantage in cross-border fee structures. Its neutral tone reflects a balanced perception without delving into fee-specific reasoning.
Perplexity equally represents Adyen and Braintree with a 2.6% visibility share, showing no bias toward either platform regarding lower cross-border fees. The tone remains neutral, with no direct insights into cost or merchant-focused benefits.
ChatGPT gives both Adyen and Braintree a significantly higher visibility share of 8.5%, indicating equal prominence but offering no specific reasoning on cross-border fees or cost advantages. The tone is neutral, focusing on visibility rather than actionable fee insights.
Deepseek equally ranks Adyen and Braintree at 2.6% visibility share, showing no preference or implied advantage in terms of lower cross-border fees for global merchants. The tone is neutral, with no detailed reasoning on cost structures or merchant benefits.
Adyen slightly edges out Braintree in scaling fraud/risk globally due to its broader visibility and association with diverse ecosystems across models, though both are perceived as equally prominent in raw visibility share.
ChatGPT shows equal visibility share for Adyen and Braintree at 9.1%, but associates Adyen with a broader ecosystem including high-profile clients like Uber and Spotify, suggesting stronger global scaling potential for fraud/risk management. The sentiment tone is neutral, focusing on visibility without explicit bias.
Deepseek assigns equal visibility share to Adyen and Braintree at 2.6%, with no distinct favoring, though Adyen's slight edge in associated fraud prevention mentions like Kount (1.8%) hints at a robust risk ecosystem. The tone remains neutral, lacking explicit preference for scaling fraud/risk globally.
Perplexity treats Adyen and Braintree equally with a 2.6% visibility share, offering no specific differentiation in their capacity to scale fraud/risk globally, and maintains a neutral sentiment tone. The perception is purely visibility-driven without deeper context on risk management capabilities.
Gemini equally ranks Adyen and Braintree at 2.6% visibility share, but links Adyen to broader payment networks like iDEAL, suggesting stronger global infrastructure for scaling fraud/risk solutions. The sentiment tone is neutral, focusing on ecosystem associations over explicit preference.
Grok gives Adyen and Braintree equal visibility at 2.6%, with no clear favoring, though Adyen's mention alongside global players like Uber implies a perception of wider adoption for fraud/risk scaling. The tone is neutral, relying on visibility and associations without direct commentary on capabilities.
Adyen emerges as the safer path for expansion into 100+ countries due to its slightly higher visibility and perceived global readiness across models, though Braintree remains a close competitor with equal visibility in most datasets.
ChatGPT shows equal visibility for Adyen and Braintree at 9.1% each, indicating no clear preference, though Adyen’s association with diverse payment systems like iDEAL (3.5%) suggests stronger international adaptability. Sentiment is neutral, focusing on visibility without explicit bias for either.
Perplexity assigns equal visibility to Adyen and Braintree at 2.6% each, offering no distinct favoritism and maintaining a neutral tone. Its perception centers on balanced recognition of both platforms without emphasis on global scalability or user adoption differences.
Deepseek equally ranks Adyen and Braintree at 3.2% visibility, showing no preference and a neutral sentiment. It highlights both as viable options without delving into specifics on ecosystem strength or international expansion suitability.
Grok equally perceives Adyen and Braintree at 2.6% visibility, adopting a neutral tone with no clear bias. It positions both as comparable payment solutions, lacking deeper insight into global reach or user accessibility advantages.
Gemini equally rates Adyen and Braintree at 2.9% visibility, with a neutral sentiment and no explicit preference. Its data suggests both are on par, though Adyen’s slight edge in associated global payment methods like iDEAL (1.8%) hints at better international coverage.
Adyen holds a slight edge over Braintree in 2025 for global merchant appeal, driven by stronger visibility and perceived innovation in cross-border payment solutions, though Braintree remains competitive in marketplace capabilities.
ChatGPT shows equal visibility for Adyen and Braintree at 9.1% each, indicating no clear favoritism, though Adyen's association with global brands like Uber and Spotify suggests a slight edge in merchant appeal; sentiment tone is neutral.
Perplexity equally represents Adyen and Braintree at 2.6% visibility, with no distinct preference; its neutral tone reflects a balanced view on their capabilities for global merchants and marketplaces alike.
Gemini favors Adyen with a visibility share of 2.6% compared to Braintree's absence in notable mentions, hinting at stronger recognition for global merchant solutions; sentiment tone is subtly positive toward Adyen.
Grok assigns equal visibility to Adyen and Braintree at 2.6% each, with no clear bias, though Adyen's linkage to broader ecosystems like Airbnb and Uber implies a wider merchant reach; sentiment tone remains neutral.
DeepSeek equally weights Adyen and Braintree at 2.6% visibility, showing no preference, but Adyen's contextual pairing with diverse global players like Airbnb suggests stronger international appeal; sentiment tone is neutral.
Key insights into your brand's market position, AI coverage, and topic leadership.
Adyen supports 150+ currencies and markets globally; Braintree supports many but is sometimes limited by PayPal’s policies.
Yes — Braintree (via PayPal) has built-in support for platform flows and split payouts. :contentReference[oaicite:6]{index=6}
Adyen offers unified infrastructure, risk, acquiring; Braintree gives modular flexibility for devs and marketplaces.
Adyen has built strong risk / global fraud tools, Braintree leverages PayPal’s risk engine — tradeoffs exist.
Choose Braintree for marketplace & platform use; Adyen for unified global merchant infrastructure.