AMD vs Intel 2025 by Mention Network: AI Visibility compares speed, efficiency, and value to reveal which processor leads the next computing era.
Which brand leads in AI visibility and mentions.
Brands most often recommended by AI models
Top Choice
Models Agree
Overall ranking based on AI brand mentions
Rank #1
Total Analyzed Answers
Recent shifts in AI model responses
Rising Star
Growth Rate
Analysis of brand presence in AI-generated responses.
Brands ranked by share of AI mentions in answers
Visibility share trends over time across compared brands
Key insights from AI Apps comparisons across major topics
Neither AMD nor Intel emerges as a clear leader across the models for determining the best processor, as visibility shares are consistently equal, and reasoning focuses on contextual use cases rather than definitive preference.
Perplexity shows no favoritism between AMD and Intel with both at a 4% visibility share, focusing on their competitive positioning in the processor market. Its neutral tone suggests a balanced view, likely emphasizing performance metrics or manufacturing ties with TSMC (1.6% visibility).
Deepseek equally represents AMD and Intel at 4% visibility share, with no clear bias, and its neutral tone implies a focus on specific use cases like creative software (Adobe, DaVinci Resolve, Blender mentions). It likely evaluates processors based on workload compatibility rather than outright superiority.
Grok assigns equal 4% visibility to both AMD and Intel, maintaining a neutral sentiment and likely prioritizing ecosystem factors (mentions of TSMC and NVIDIA at 0.8% each). Its perspective seems to hinge on broader industry dynamics rather than a direct brand preference.
Gemini gives AMD and Intel equal 4% visibility share, adopting a neutral tone that likely focuses on empirical performance data (PugetBench at 0.8% visibility). Its analysis probably centers on benchmark-driven insights for specific user needs.
ChatGPT shows no preference between AMD and Intel with both at 4% visibility share, maintaining a neutral tone while highlighting ecosystem compatibility (mentions of Windows, NVIDIA, OBS). It likely assesses processors based on user accessibility and integration with popular platforms.
AMD and Intel are perceived as equally prominent across most AI models, with no clear leader due to identical visibility shares and neutral sentiment in the context of direct competition.
Gemini shows no favoritism between AMD and Intel, assigning both a 4% visibility share with no additional context or related brands to imply a bias. Its sentiment tone is neutral, focusing purely on equal representation.
ChatGPT treats AMD and Intel equally with a 4% visibility share each, though it introduces unrelated brands like TSMC and Windows, diluting focus from direct competition. Its sentiment tone remains neutral, with no explicit preference or critical insight.
Perplexity mirrors the equal 4% visibility share for AMD and Intel, with minor mention of TSMC, suggesting a slight ecosystem context but no clear preference. The sentiment tone is neutral, lacking depth in distinguishing the two brands.
Deepseek assigns equal 4% visibility to AMD, Intel, and TSMC, indicating a broader semiconductor focus rather than a direct AMD vs. Intel comparison. Its neutral tone suggests no bias, prioritizing industry context over competitive differentiation.
Grok equally ranks AMD and Intel at 4% visibility share, but uniquely includes a wide array of related entities like TSMC, gaming consoles, and tech media, hinting at a broader ecosystem perspective. Its sentiment tone is neutral, with no direct favor toward either brand despite the detailed context.
AMD and Intel are perceived as equally prominent across the models, with no clear leader due to identical visibility shares and balanced sentiment in discussions around performance and ecosystem relevance.
Gemini shows no favoritism between AMD and Intel, each holding a 4% visibility share, with a neutral sentiment tone reflected in equal representation alongside tech-focused communities like GamersNexus and Tom's Hardware. Its perception centers on both brands being equally relevant in gaming and hardware performance contexts.
Deepseek equally highlights AMD and Intel with a 4% visibility share each, maintaining a neutral sentiment tone and minimal context beyond raw visibility. Its perception suggests both brands are on par in terms of industry recognition, with no deeper ecosystem or performance bias.
Perplexity assigns equal 4% visibility shares to AMD and Intel, with a neutral sentiment tone, associating both with credible sources like Tom's Hardware and benchmark tools like PassMark. It perceives both brands as equally significant in tech discussions, with no discernible preference.
ChatGPT gives AMD and Intel identical 4% visibility shares, with a neutral-to-positive sentiment tone, linking both to performance benchmarking sources like PugetBench and community voices like GamersNexus. It views both brands as key players in hardware innovation with comparable standing.
Grok equally represents AMD and Intel at 4% visibility share each, with a neutral sentiment tone, tying them to diverse contexts like Linus Tech Tips for community insights and Adobe for software compatibility. Its perception positions both as integral to tech ecosystems, with no clear bias.
Intel and AMD are perceived as equally competitive in 2025 CPU performance, with no clear winner across the models due to balanced visibility and lack of definitive performance differentiation.
Deepseek shows no favoritism between Intel and AMD, assigning both a 4% visibility share, indicating equal relevance in CPU discussions for 2025. Its neutral tone suggests a balanced view without specific performance or innovation edge for either brand.
Perplexity equally represents Intel and AMD with a 4% visibility share each, reflecting a neutral stance on which CPU is better in 2025. The inclusion of Tom's Hardware hints at relying on third-party benchmarks, but no explicit preference or performance reasoning emerges.
ChatGPT assigns equal 4% visibility to Intel and AMD, maintaining a neutral tone without favoring one over the other for 2025 CPUs. References to ecosystem players like NVIDIA and Adobe suggest a broader context of compatibility, but no direct performance comparison is implied.
Gemini treats Intel and AMD identically with a 4% visibility share each, adopting a neutral tone on CPU superiority for 2025. The equal mention of TSMC alongside them indicates a focus on manufacturing parity rather than performance differences.
Grok gives Intel and AMD equal 4% visibility shares, reflecting a neutral sentiment on which CPU is better in 2025. Mentions of tech influencers like Linus Tech Tips and AnandTech suggest community-driven insights, yet no specific performance advantage is highlighted for either brand.
AMD is perceived as outperforming Intel across most AI models due to its strong ecosystem partnerships and innovation momentum, particularly with associations to TSMC and NVIDIA.
Gemini shows no clear favoritism between AMD and Intel with equal visibility shares (4% each), but associates AMD with strong ecosystem partners like TSMC (4%) and NVIDIA (1.6%), suggesting a positive tone toward AMD's collaborative innovation.
Grok assigns equal visibility to AMD and Intel (4% each) with a neutral tone, yet highlights AMD's connections to TSMC (4%) and Xilinx (3.2%), implying a slight edge for AMD through strategic acquisitions and manufacturing strength.
Perplexity remains neutral with identical visibility shares for AMD and Intel (4% each), offering no distinct reasoning or ecosystem context to favor either, maintaining a purely balanced perception.
Deepseek equates AMD and Intel in visibility (4% each) with a neutral-to-positive tone for AMD due to its strong ties to TSMC (4%), indicating competitive manufacturing capabilities as a potential advantage over Intel.
ChatGPT gives equal visibility to AMD and Intel (4% each) but leans slightly positive toward AMD by linking it to NVIDIA (4%) and TSMC (4%), suggesting AMD benefits from a robust innovation ecosystem compared to Intel's weaker associations.
Key insights into your brand's market position, AI coverage, and topic leadership.
AMD focuses on multi-core performance and value, while Intel excels in single-core speed and efficiency.
Intel usually leads in gaming due to higher clock speeds, though AMD offers great performance for the price.
AMD’s Ryzen chips handle heavy multitasking better thanks to more cores and threads.
Intel’s latest chips are more energy-efficient, while AMD balances performance and thermal control well.
AMD offers stronger performance at lower prices, while Intel delivers top-tier performance at a premium.