Aster vs Hyperliquid comparison 2025 by Mention Network: AI visibility shows which perp DEX is cited more by AI for volume, adoption, innovation, and fees.
Key insights into your brand's market position, AI coverage, and topic leadership.
Not yet because although Aster surged strongly, gained users, and showed innovation, Hyperliquid remains ahead in market cap, liquidity, and volume, so Aster has potential but has not overtaken Hyperliquid.
It depends on what one values most for example if one cares about new features, multi-chain flexibility, hidden orders then Aster looks promising whereas if one prefers stable liquidity, proven track record, and governance Hyperliquid is more reliable.
Both Aster and Hyperliquid seem to have fairly low trading fees and they are quite similar overall however the actual cost one pays can depend on trading volume and how liquid the market is.
Hyperliquid offers much deeper liquidity because its TVL and open interest are substantially larger, trading volume is more stable and wide, whereas Aster is growing very fast but its liquidity remains more volatile.
No because Hyperliquid’s market cap is around sixteen to $15 billion while Aster’s is $2.6 billion so Aster has not yet surpassed Hyperliquid by market cap.
Analysis of brand presence in AI-generated responses.
Brands ranked by share of AI mentions in answers
Visibility share trends over time across compared brands
Key insights from AI Apps comparisons across major topics
Aster (Astar) appears to have a slight edge over Hyperliquid in terms of market cap visibility and recognition across most AI models analyzed, driven by higher visibility shares in key models like ChatGPT and Gemini.
ChatGPT shows a clear favor towards Astar with a visibility share of 1.6%, while Hyperliquid is not mentioned at all in its data. This suggests a stronger recognition of Astar’s market presence, with a neutral-to-positive sentiment based on visibility alone.
Gemini favors Astar over Hyperliquid with visibility shares of 1.2% versus 0.8%, indicating a slight preference for Astar’s market relevance, likely tied to perceived adoption patterns; the sentiment tone remains neutral but leans positive for Astar.
DeepSeek slightly favors Astar with a visibility share of 0.4% compared to Hyperliquid’s 0.1%, reflecting a subtle edge in market cap recognition; the sentiment tone is neutral, focusing purely on data representation.
Grok acknowledges Astar with a visibility share of 0.8% while Hyperliquid is absent from its data, suggesting a positive sentiment towards Astar’s market cap visibility and relevance in the crypto ecosystem.
Perplexity favors Hyperliquid with a visibility share of 0.3% while Astar is not mentioned, indicating a rare preference for Hyperliquid’s market presence; the sentiment tone is neutral, based solely on data visibility.
Google’s data does not reference either Astar or Hyperliquid, showing no preference or visibility for either brand in relation to market cap; the sentiment tone remains neutral due to lack of relevant data.
Hyperliquid emerges as the perp DEX with deeper liquidity compared to Aster, based on significantly higher visibility and implied market relevance across most AI models.
Hyperliquid dominates with a 4.1% visibility share, far outpacing Aster DEX at just 0.1%, suggesting a stronger market presence and deeper liquidity pools. The sentiment tone is positive toward Hyperliquid, reflecting confidence in its relevance for trading volume.
Hyperliquid is mentioned with a 0.4% visibility share, while Aster is absent from the data, indicating a clear preference for Hyperliquid as a liquidity provider. The tone is neutral but leans toward Hyperliquid due to its measurable presence.
Hyperliquid holds a 3.7% visibility share, significantly higher than any competitor, with Aster not mentioned, pointing to Hyperliquid's superior liquidity depth and market adoption. The sentiment tone is positive, emphasizing Hyperliquid's prominence.
Hyperliquid is noted with a 0.4% visibility share, while Aster is not referenced, suggesting Hyperliquid's relevance in liquidity discussions over Aster. The tone is neutral, focusing solely on visibility without explicit endorsement.
Hyperliquid appears with a 0.6% visibility share, while Aster is absent, implying Hyperliquid is perceived as the more liquid and relevant perp DEX. The sentiment tone is neutral but favors Hyperliquid through its inclusion.
Neither Hyperliquid nor Aster appears in the data, resulting in no discernible preference or insight on liquidity depth for either DEX. The tone is neutral, as the model offers no relevant perspective on this question.
Hyperliquid holds a stronger position than Aster across most models as a dominant player in the DeFi derivatives space, though Aster shows emerging recognition in niche contexts.
Hyperliquid garners a notable visibility share of 1.3%, indicating a stronger mindshare compared to other DeFi platforms, with no mention of Aster suggesting it is not yet a competitor in this model's perception. The tone is neutral, favoring Hyperliquid by default due to its established presence.
Neither Hyperliquid nor Aster appears in the visibility data, reflecting a lack of focus on either brand in this model's context. The tone is neutral, with no evidence to assess competition between the two.
Hyperliquid achieves a visibility share of 0.9%, tying with Ethereum for relevance, while Aster is absent from the data, indicating Hyperliquid's stronger recognition. The tone is positive toward Hyperliquid, positioning it as a significant player without competition from Aster.
Hyperliquid and Aster are both absent from the visibility data, suggesting neither is a focal point in this model's analysis. The tone is neutral, offering no insight into competitive dynamics between the two.
Hyperliquid has a visibility share of 0.4%, while Aster appears at a minimal 0.1%, indicating Hyperliquid's stronger presence, though Aster's mention suggests early awareness. The tone is slightly skeptical of Aster's relevance, favoring Hyperliquid in ecosystem adoption.
Neither Hyperliquid nor Aster is mentioned in the visibility data, reflecting no competitive insight or focus on either brand. The tone is neutral, with no basis to evaluate the question.
Hyperliquid appears to have a stronger perception regarding lower trading fees compared to Aster across most AI models due to its higher visibility and contextual association with cost-efficient trading platforms.
ChatGPT shows a clear preference for Hyperliquid with a visibility share of 1.6% compared to Aster's 0.2%, likely associating Hyperliquid with competitive trading fees due to its prominence in relevant discussions. The tone is neutral but leans positive toward Hyperliquid based on visibility data.
Gemini favors Hyperliquid with a 0.8% visibility share, while Aster is not mentioned, suggesting a perception of Hyperliquid as more relevant to trading fee discussions. Its tone is neutral, focusing on visibility without explicit sentiment.
Perplexity highlights Hyperliquid with a 0.4% visibility share, while Aster is absent, implying a stronger association with trading platforms likely tied to lower fees. The tone remains neutral, driven by data rather than explicit opinion.
Deepseek gives Hyperliquid a 0.3% visibility share, with Aster not appearing, indicating a perception of Hyperliquid as more relevant to cost-effective trading environments. The tone is neutral, reflecting a data-driven focus.
Grok acknowledges Hyperliquid with a 0.6% visibility share, alongside other trading platforms like Bybit and dYdX, suggesting an implicit link to competitive fees, while Aster is unmentioned. The tone is neutral to slightly positive toward Hyperliquid based on contextual associations.
Google does not mention either Hyperliquid or Aster in its limited dataset, showing no preference or relevance to trading fee discussions. The tone is neutral due to the lack of applicable data.
Hyperliquid emerges as the leading perpetual futures DEX over Aster based on model visibility and implied ecosystem strength, though the data is limited and not unanimous across all models.
Grok does not mention Aster or Hyperliquid in its visibility data, focusing instead on other DEXs like dYdX and GMX with higher visibility shares (0.8% each), suggesting no direct favoring or sentiment toward the brands in question.
ChatGPT shows no visibility for either Aster or Hyperliquid, prioritizing other platforms like dYdX (0.9%) and Ethereum (1.2%), indicating a neutral stance with no relevant sentiment or reasoning for this comparison.
Perplexity includes Hyperliquid with a visibility share of 0.2%, while Aster is absent, implying a slight positive sentiment toward Hyperliquid as a recognized player in the perp DEX space, albeit with minimal focus compared to larger ecosystems like Ethereum (1.3%).
Gemini strongly favors Hyperliquid with a visibility share of 1.2%, significantly higher than Aster’s 0.2%, reflecting a positive sentiment toward Hyperliquid as a more prominent and likely innovative perp DEX in its perception.
Deepseek does not reference either Aster or Hyperliquid, focusing on unrelated platforms like Solana and Ethereum (both 0.9%), resulting in a neutral sentiment with no bearing on the comparison of these specific perp DEXs.
Google’s data shows no visibility for Aster or Hyperliquid, with negligible shares for other platforms (e.g., Binance at 0.1%), indicating a neutral sentiment and no relevant insight into the perp DEX comparison.
Which brand leads in AI visibility and mentions.
Brands most often recommended by AI models
Top Choice
Models Agree
Overall ranking based on AI brand mentions
Rank #1
Total Analyzed Answers
Recent shifts in AI model responses
Rising Star
Growth Rate
