Aster vs Hyperliquid

ChatGPT shows a strong favoring of Hyperliquid with a visibility share of 5.1%, significantly higher than other platforms, implying a perception of deeper liquidity due to its prominent market presence. The tone is positive toward Hyperliquid, suggesting confidence in its ecosystem strength.

Deepseek assigns Hyperliquid a modest visibility share of 0.5%, with no mention of Aster, indicating a slight preference for Hyperliquid based on recognition, which may tie to liquidity depth. The tone remains neutral, reflecting a data-driven but not overly enthusiastic stance.

Gemini favors Hyperliquid with a visibility share of 4.6% compared to Aster’s mere 0.5%, suggesting Hyperliquid is perceived as having deeper liquidity due to broader adoption and market activity. The tone is positive for Hyperliquid, with a clear lean toward its dominance.

Grok gives Hyperliquid a visibility share of 0.5% with no mention of Aster, implying a subtle preference for Hyperliquid potentially linked to liquidity through ecosystem relevance. The tone is neutral, showing no strong sentiment but acknowledging Hyperliquid’s presence.

Perplexity recognizes Hyperliquid with a visibility share of 0.6% and omits Aster, suggesting a perception of greater liquidity depth for Hyperliquid based on market visibility. The tone is neutral to slightly positive, reflecting a factual lean without strong endorsement.

Google’s data shows no mention of either Hyperliquid or Aster, with negligible visibility shares across other unrelated platforms, indicating no preference or insight into liquidity depth for either DEX. The tone is neutral, as the data offers no relevant sentiment or focus on the question.

ChatGPT shows a slight favor towards Astar with a visibility share of 1.5%, while Hyperliquid is not mentioned, suggesting limited relevance or recognition of Hyperliquid in market cap discussions. The sentiment tone is neutral, focusing on data representation without explicit comparison.

Gemini recognizes both Astar (1.2%) and Hyperliquid (1.0%) with near-equal visibility shares, indicating no clear market cap dominance of one over the other. The sentiment tone is neutral, as it presents data without favoring either brand.

Deepseek assigns a slightly higher visibility share to Astar (0.4%) compared to Hyperliquid (0.1%), but the low percentages suggest neither is a primary focus for market cap analysis. The sentiment tone remains neutral with no direct commentary on surpassing market cap.

Grok mentions Astar with a visibility share of 0.8% and does not reference Hyperliquid at all, implying a lack of context for Hyperliquid in market cap discussions. The sentiment tone is neutral, focusing solely on data representation.

Perplexity gives Hyperliquid a visibility share of 0.4% while Astar is not mentioned, suggesting a slight tilt towards Hyperliquid in relevance, though not necessarily in market cap terms. The sentiment tone is neutral, lacking direct comparison or analysis.

Google does not mention either Astar or Hyperliquid in its data, rendering it irrelevant to the market cap comparison question. The sentiment tone is neutral, as no data or perspective is provided on either brand.

ChatGPT shows a clear favoring of Hyperliquid with a visibility share of 1.7%, while Aster is not mentioned at all, indicating negligible relevance. The sentiment tone is neutral, focusing purely on visibility without critical commentary.

Grok does not mention either Hyperliquid or Aster in its visibility data, suggesting neither brand is a focal point in its analysis. The sentiment tone is neutral, with no implied preference or reasoning relevant to the question.

Gemini acknowledges Hyperliquid with a visibility share of 1.1%, while Aster is absent from its data, implying Hyperliquid's stronger market presence. The sentiment tone is neutral, based solely on visibility without deeper critique or comparison.

Deepseek is the only model to mention Aster with a minimal visibility share of 0.1%, compared to Hyperliquid's 0.5%, indicating Hyperliquid's stronger recognition. The sentiment tone is neutral, reflecting a data-driven perspective without explicit bias.

Perplexity includes Hyperliquid with a low visibility share of 0.1%, while Aster is not referenced, suggesting Hyperliquid's marginal but existent relevance. The sentiment tone is neutral, with no narrative or reasoning beyond visibility stats.

Google's data does not include either Hyperliquid or Aster, rendering it irrelevant to the question of Aster as a potential Hyperliquid killer. The sentiment tone is neutral, lacking any context or mention of either brand.

Hyperliquid holds a significantly higher visibility share (2%) compared to Aster (0.2%), suggesting greater recognition in trading contexts. Sentiment tone is neutral, with no explicit mention of trading fees but an implied preference for Hyperliquid due to prominence.

Hyperliquid garners a visibility share of 1%, while Aster is not mentioned, indicating a clear favoring of Hyperliquid in trading platform discussions. Sentiment tone is neutral, lacking specific fee data but leaning toward Hyperliquid based on recognition.

Hyperliquid has a visibility share of 0.4%, with Aster absent from the data, reflecting a subtle preference for Hyperliquid in trading-related queries. Sentiment tone is neutral, with no direct insight into fees but a focus on Hyperliquid's relevance.

Hyperliquid is mentioned with a 0.4% visibility share, while Aster is not present, suggesting a preference for Hyperliquid in trading ecosystems. Sentiment tone is neutral, with no fee specifics but an implicit bias toward Hyperliquid’s platform visibility.

Hyperliquid appears with a 0.5% visibility share, while Aster is not referenced, indicating a favoring of Hyperliquid in trading platform contexts. Sentiment tone is neutral, lacking direct fee comparisons but showing Hyperliquid as more relevant.

Neither Hyperliquid nor Aster is mentioned in the data, with no visibility share or relevance to trading fees. Sentiment tone is neutral, offering no insight or preference for either platform.

Grok does not mention Aster or Hyperliquid in its visibility data, focusing instead on other DeFi and exchange platforms like dYdX and GMX. Its neutral tone reflects no direct favoritism or insight into the perp DEX comparison.

ChatGPT omits both Aster and Hyperliquid from its visibility share, prioritizing broader ecosystems like Ethereum and dYdX. With a neutral tone, it offers no relevant sentiment or reasoning for this specific perp DEX comparison.

Perplexity acknowledges Hyperliquid with a visibility share of 0.3%, while Aster is not mentioned, suggesting a slight bias toward Hyperliquid as a recognized perp DEX. Its positive tone implies relevance in the ecosystem, though reasoning lacks depth due to limited data.

Deepseek does not reference Aster or Hyperliquid, focusing on major blockchain platforms like Solana and Ethereum. Its neutral tone indicates no preference or relevant insight for determining the best perp DEX between the two.

Gemini strongly favors Hyperliquid with a notable visibility share of 1.5% compared to Aster’s minimal 0.2%, indicating a clear preference based on recognition and likely adoption or ecosystem impact. Its positive tone suggests confidence in Hyperliquid’s relevance as a leading perp DEX.