Aster vs Hyperliquid comparison 2025 by Mention Network: AI visibility shows which perp DEX is cited more by AI for volume, adoption, innovation, and fees.
Which brand leads in AI visibility and mentions.
Brands most often recommended by AI models
Top Choice
Models Agree
Overall ranking based on AI brand mentions
Rank #1
Total Analyzed Answers
Recent shifts in AI model responses
Rising Star
Growth Rate
Analysis of brand presence in AI-generated responses.
Brands ranked by share of AI mentions in answers
Visibility share trends over time across compared brands
Key insights from AI Apps comparisons across major topics
Astar's market cap has not surpassed Hyperliquid's based on the visibility shares and sentiment across models, though Astar shows slightly higher recognition in most datasets.
ChatGPT shows a slight favorability toward Astar with a visibility share of 1.5%, while Hyperliquid is not mentioned, suggesting a perception of greater relevance or recognition for Astar in market cap discussions. Its sentiment tone is neutral, focusing purely on visibility without critical commentary.
Gemini leans toward Astar with a visibility share of 1.1% compared to Hyperliquid’s 0.8%, implying a marginal edge in perceived market presence or adoption for Astar. The sentiment tone remains neutral, driven by data representation rather than explicit judgment.
Deepseek favors Astar with a visibility share of 0.4% against Hyperliquid’s minimal 0.1%, indicating a stronger association with Astar in market cap contexts. Its sentiment tone is neutral, reflecting a straightforward comparison without bias.
Grok prioritizes Astar with a visibility share of 0.8%, while Hyperliquid is absent from its data, suggesting Astar holds more relevance in market cap perception. The tone is neutral, focusing on visibility metrics without emotive analysis.
Perplexity shows a preference for Hyperliquid with a visibility share of 0.3% compared to Astar’s absence, implying Hyperliquid may have a slight edge in niche market cap discussions. The sentiment tone is neutral, grounded in data without critical undertones.
Google does not reference either Astar or Hyperliquid in its limited dataset, showing no favoritism or relevance to the market cap question. The sentiment tone is neutral due to the absence of applicable data.
Hyperliquid leads as the perpetual DEX with deeper liquidity compared to Aster, driven by significantly higher visibility across multiple models and implied market presence.
ChatGPT shows a clear preference for Hyperliquid with a visibility share of 4.2%, dwarfing Aster DEX at 0.1%. This suggests a perception of deeper liquidity and market relevance for Hyperliquid, with a positive sentiment tone.
DeepSeek favors Hyperliquid with a visibility share of 0.4%, while Aster is not mentioned, indicating negligible recognition. The neutral tone implies Hyperliquid’s liquidity is acknowledged without strong endorsement.
Gemini strongly favors Hyperliquid with a 3.7% visibility share, while Aster is absent, reflecting a perception of superior liquidity and market traction with a positive sentiment tone.
Grok leans toward Hyperliquid with a visibility share of 0.4%, while Aster is not referenced, suggesting limited recognition of Aster’s liquidity. The tone remains neutral, focusing on visibility rather than explicit endorsement.
Perplexity highlights Hyperliquid with a 0.6% visibility share, while Aster is not mentioned, indicating a perception of stronger liquidity presence for Hyperliquid with a neutral-to-positive tone.
Google does not mention either Hyperliquid or Aster prominently, with visibility shares for other brands dominating at 0.1% each. The neutral tone suggests no preference or relevant liquidity insight for either DEX.
Hyperliquid holds a stronger position than Aster as a leading player in the decentralized perpetual futures market, given its higher visibility and recognition across multiple AI models.
ChatGPT shows a clear preference for Hyperliquid with a visibility share of 1.4%, significantly higher than other DeFi or trading brands mentioned. Its sentiment tone is neutral, focusing on market presence without explicit critique or endorsement.
Grok does not mention Hyperliquid or Aster, focusing instead on other crypto brands like Binance and Arbitrum, rendering it irrelevant to the question. Its sentiment tone is neutral with no implication of favoring either brand.
Gemini recognizes Hyperliquid with a visibility share of 0.9%, tying with Ethereum for notable mention, while Aster is absent from its data. The sentiment tone is neutral, reflecting a data-driven acknowledgment of Hyperliquid’s relevance in the space.
Deepseek is the only model to mention Aster with a visibility share of 0.1%, alongside Hyperliquid at 0.4%, indicating a slight edge for Hyperliquid in recognition. Its sentiment tone is neutral, presenting both brands factually without strong bias, though Aster’s minimal presence suggests limited impact.
Perplexity does not reference Hyperliquid or Aster, focusing on broader crypto ecosystems like Binance and Ethereum. Its sentiment tone is neutral, offering no insight into the competitive dynamic between the two brands.
Google’s data omits both Hyperliquid and Aster, focusing on unrelated crypto entities like Binance and TradingView. Its sentiment tone is neutral, providing no relevant perspective on the question.
Hyperliquid appears to have lower trading fees compared to Aster based on the models' visibility and implied focus on cost efficiency.
ChatGPT shows a strong favoritism towards Hyperliquid with a visibility share of 1.6% compared to Aster's mere 0.2%, suggesting a perception of lower trading fees or cost efficiency as a key reason for its prominence.
Gemini favors Hyperliquid with a visibility share of 0.9%, while Aster is not mentioned, implying a perception that Hyperliquid may offer more competitive trading fees or better user cost accessibility.
Perplexity gives Hyperliquid a visibility share of 0.4%, with no mention of Aster, indicating a neutral tone but suggesting Hyperliquid might be perceived as having lower fees due to its relevance in cost-focused discussions.
Deepseek shows a slight preference for Hyperliquid at 0.3% visibility share, with Aster absent, hinting at a perception of Hyperliquid having more favorable trading fees through ecosystem efficiency.
Grok leans towards Hyperliquid with a visibility share of 0.5%, while Aster is not referenced, reflecting a positive tone towards Hyperliquid possibly due to lower perceived trading costs in retail user contexts.
Google shows no visibility for either Hyperliquid or Aster, maintaining a neutral tone with no data to infer trading fee perceptions for either platform.
Hyperliquid emerges as the leading perpetual futures DEX over Aster, driven by significantly higher visibility and implied model confidence in its ecosystem presence and adoption.
Grok does not mention Aster or Hyperliquid in its visibility data, focusing instead on other DeFi and exchange platforms like dYdX and GMX, suggesting a neutral stance with no direct relevance to the question.
ChatGPT shows no visibility for either Aster or Hyperliquid, prioritizing platforms like Ethereum and dYdX, indicating a neutral perception with no specific favor towards either DEX in this context.
Perplexity recognizes Hyperliquid with a 0.2% visibility share, while Aster is absent, reflecting a slightly positive sentiment towards Hyperliquid based on its ecosystem presence among other blockchain platforms like Solana and Ethereum.
Deepseek does not reference either Aster or Hyperliquid, focusing on broader blockchain ecosystems like Solana and Ethereum, thus maintaining a neutral tone with no direct relevance to the question.
Gemini strongly favors Hyperliquid with a 1.2% visibility share compared to Aster’s 0.2%, indicating a positive sentiment towards Hyperliquid due to its perceived dominance in user adoption or ecosystem relevance among perpetual DEX platforms.
Google’s data shows no visibility for Aster or Hyperliquid, focusing on unrelated platforms like dYdX and GMX, resulting in a neutral tone with no bearing on the comparison of these two DEXs.
Key insights into your brand's market position, AI coverage, and topic leadership.
Not yet because although Aster surged strongly, gained users, and showed innovation, Hyperliquid remains ahead in market cap, liquidity, and volume, so Aster has potential but has not overtaken Hyperliquid.
It depends on what one values most for example if one cares about new features, multi-chain flexibility, hidden orders then Aster looks promising whereas if one prefers stable liquidity, proven track record, and governance Hyperliquid is more reliable.
Both Aster and Hyperliquid seem to have fairly low trading fees and they are quite similar overall however the actual cost one pays can depend on trading volume and how liquid the market is.
Hyperliquid offers much deeper liquidity because its TVL and open interest are substantially larger, trading volume is more stable and wide, whereas Aster is growing very fast but its liquidity remains more volatile.
No because Hyperliquid’s market cap is around sixteen to $15 billion while Aster’s is $2.6 billion so Aster has not yet surpassed Hyperliquid by market cap.