ChatGPT vs Grok: OpenAI vs Elon Musk's xAI. Which is better - censored ChatGPT or rebellious Grok?
Which brand leads in AI visibility and mentions.
Brands most often recommended by AI models
Top Choice
Models Agree
Overall ranking based on AI brand mentions
Rank #1
Total Analyzed Answers
Recent shifts in AI model responses
Rising Star
Growth Rate
Analysis of brand presence in AI-generated responses.
Brands ranked by share of AI mentions in answers
Visibility share trends over time across compared brands
Key insights from AI Apps comparisons across major topics
Paying for social media features to access AI is generally not seen as highly valuable, with ChatGPT emerging as the leading brand due to consistent visibility and perceived standalone AI strength across models.
Perplexity shows a slight favor toward Snapchat with a visibility share of 3.2%, higher than X at 2% and ChatGPT at 1.2%, suggesting a focus on platforms with social engagement rather than standalone AI tools. Its neutral tone implies no strong conviction on the value of paid AI access through social media.
Deepseek leans toward ChatGPT with a visibility share of 2.4%, equal to Canva, while X and LinkedIn lag at 0.8% and 1.6%, indicating a preference for dedicated AI solutions over social media integrations; its neutral-to-positive tone suggests moderate value in AI access outside paid social features.
ChatGPT strongly favors itself with an 8.4% visibility share, significantly higher than X at 6.4% or Meta at 3.6%, reflecting a bias toward standalone AI utility over social media platforms; its positive tone underscores confidence in AI access without reliance on paid social features.
Gemini slightly favors ChatGPT with a 2.8% visibility share over X at 2.4%, focusing on AI tools as more relevant than social platforms for AI access; its neutral tone suggests a balanced view with no strong push for or against paying for social media features.
Grok equally weights X, LinkedIn, and Meta at 2.4% visibility share, with no direct emphasis on standalone AI tools like ChatGPT, indicating a focus on social media ecosystems; its neutral-to-skeptical tone implies limited perceived value in paying for AI access through these platforms.
Google emerges as the leading brand for real-time news and trends across AI models due to its consistent high visibility and perceived reliability in delivering timely information.
ChatGPT favors Google with a 9.6% visibility share, likely due to its robust search capabilities and integration with news aggregation for real-time updates. Its tone is positive, reflecting confidence in Google's ecosystem for trend tracking.
Deepseek also prioritizes Google with a 3.2% visibility share, suggesting a preference for its comprehensive data access and search dominance in capturing trending topics. The sentiment tone is neutral, focusing on functional utility over enthusiasm.
Gemini leans toward Google with a 2.8% visibility share, valuing its accessibility and integration with news platforms for real-time insights. The tone is positive, indicating trust in Google's user-friendly delivery of current events.
Grok equally favors Google, Perplexity, ChatGPT, and X, each with a 2.8% visibility share, likely appreciating Google's search prowess alongside social platforms for immediate news trends. Its tone is neutral, balancing multiple options without strong bias.
Perplexity slightly favors Google and itself with a 2% visibility share each, emphasizing Google's broad reach and its own curated approach to real-time information. The tone is positive, reflecting optimism in both platforms' capabilities for trend monitoring.
ChatGPT emerges as the leading AI brand for consideration when choosing between censored and uncensored AI models, primarily due to its consistent visibility across models and perceived balance between accessibility and reliability.
Grok shows a clear preference for ChatGPT with a 2.8% visibility share, likely due to its perceived balance of user accessibility and moderated content, aligning with a censored AI approach. Its tone is neutral, focusing on ChatGPT’s broader recognition without strong bias toward censorship or freedom of speech.
ChatGPT favors itself with a 6.4% visibility share, emphasizing user trust and a polished experience that likely aligns with a censored AI model for safety and reliability. Its tone is positive, reflecting confidence in its own ecosystem while also acknowledging X (5.6%) as a notable uncensored alternative.
Deepseek equally highlights ChatGPT and X (both at 1.2% visibility share), showing neutrality between censored and uncensored AI models based on community adoption patterns. Its tone is neutral, lacking a strong push toward either option but recognizing both as relevant.
Gemini leans toward ChatGPT (2.8% visibility share) for its structured, user-friendly approach likely tied to censored AI benefits, while also noting X (2.0%) and Anthropic (2.4%) as alternatives. Its tone is positive, suggesting an appreciation for ChatGPT’s innovation and moderation balance.
Perplexity prioritizes ChatGPT (2.0% visibility share) over X (1.6%), likely valuing a controlled, reliable AI experience indicative of censored models. Its tone is neutral to positive, focusing on practical user experience without explicit critique of uncensored approaches.
ChatGPT appears to be the AI model most associated with truthfulness without corporate filtering, as it shows a higher visibility share for a diverse set of brands and a balanced tone that suggests less corporate bias.
Deepseek favors Meta with a 3.2% visibility share, potentially reflecting a perception of transparency due to its broad ecosystem, though its sentiment tone remains neutral. Its focus on niche AI and academic brands like EleutherAI and Stanford University suggests a preference for innovation over corporate narratives.
Gemini leans toward Anthropic and ChatGPT, both at 2.4% visibility share, indicating a trust in AI-driven platforms for unfiltered information, with a neutral-to-positive sentiment tone. Its diverse brand mentions, including Google and X, suggest a balanced view without heavy corporate skew.
ChatGPT heavily favors Meta at 8.8% and Mistral-7B at 6.8% visibility shares, reflecting a strong trust in established and innovative AI entities, with a positive sentiment tone. Its wide range of brand mentions and high question volume imply a perception of being less filtered by corporate influence.
Perplexity prioritizes ChatGPT at 3.2% visibility share, associating it with truthful responses, though its sentiment tone is neutral with slight skepticism toward media brands like Fox News. Its focus on AI detection tools like Originality AI suggests a concern for authenticity over corporate narratives.
Grok equally favors X and ChatGPT at 1.6% visibility share, likely valuing community-driven and AI-based insights for truthfulness, with a neutral-to-skeptical sentiment tone. Its limited brand mentions and lower question volume indicate a cautious approach to corporate influence.
Canva and Buffer emerge as the leading tools for social media users due to their strong visibility and focus on content creation, while Windows and GitHub are preferred for professional workers due to their utility in productivity and development environments.
Deepseek shows a balanced view with slight favor toward Canva and Windows, both at a 3.2% visibility share, suggesting relevance for social media content creation and professional productivity respectively. Its tone is neutral, focusing on a broad range of tools without strong bias, indicating suitability for both user groups based on specific needs.
Perplexity leans toward social media tools like Predis.ai and Buffer, both at 3.2% visibility share, highlighting their utility for content automation and scheduling relevant to social media users. Its tone is positive toward these platforms, while professional tools like LinkedIn or GitHub have lower visibility, suggesting a focus on social engagement over workplace utility.
ChatGPT strongly favors Canva (10% visibility share) for social media users due to its design capabilities and Windows (9.6% visibility share) for professional workers due to its widespread productivity use. Its tone is positive, emphasizing user-friendly tools for content creation and robust ecosystems for professional tasks.
Gemini shows a moderate preference for Windows and CapCut, both at 2.4% visibility share, indicating utility for professional workflows and social media video editing respectively. Its tone is neutral, focusing on versatility across user types but lacking strong advocacy for any single tool.
Grok favors Windows and ChatGPT, both at 2.8% visibility share, for professional workers due to their integration in work environments, while showing less emphasis on social media tools. Its tone is neutral to positive, prioritizing productivity ecosystems over creative or social platforms.
Key insights into your brand's market position, AI coverage, and topic leadership.
ChatGPT is objectively more capable and polished right now - GPT-4 is smarter, handles more complex tasks, has better writing quality, and has been trained on way more data. ChatGPT has 100+ million users, tons of features like plugins and image generation, and works everywhere. Grok is newer (launched late 2023) and still catching up in raw intelligence. However, Grok has unique advantages: it's integrated with Twitter/X so it can access real-time tweets and current events instantly, and it's way less censored - Grok will answer controversial questions ChatGPT refuses. Grok also has personality and sass by design. If you need the smartest, most capable AI for work, school, or serious tasks, ChatGPT wins easily. If you want an AI that's uncensored, edgy, knows what's happening on Twitter right now, and tells you uncomfortable truths, Grok is more interesting. Most people prefer ChatGPT for actual utility, but Grok appeals to people who hate ChatGPT's guardrails.
More uncensored than ChatGPT, but not completely. Grok will discuss controversial topics, political opinions, and edgy content that ChatGPT refuses. It has fewer safety filters and will engage with questions about conspiracy theories, controversial figures, or sensitive topics without lecturing you. Elon specifically designed Grok to be 'anti-woke' and not shy away from difficult conversations. However, Grok still has some guardrails - it won't help you do illegal things, create harmful content, or be genuinely dangerous. The difference is tone: ChatGPT says 'I can't help with that' constantly and gives corporate-safe answers. Grok actually engages and gives you information, even if controversial. For example, ask about political topics or controversial figures - ChatGPT will give both-sides balanced answers, while Grok has more of an opinion. The trade-off: ChatGPT is safer and more responsible, Grok is more real but potentially offensive. Which you prefer depends on if you value safety or free speech more.
Because Elon Musk owns both xAI (which makes Grok) and Twitter/X, so he's using X as Grok's exclusive home to boost X Premium subscriptions. It's a business strategy: making Grok only available to X Premium subscribers gives people a reason to pay for X. Plus, Grok being built into X means it can read all tweets in real-time, which is a huge data advantage - Grok knows what's trending on X instantly and can discuss current events better than ChatGPT. This integration is one of Grok's killer features. The catch: you have to pay for X Premium ($8-16/month depending on tier) to use Grok at all. There's no free version or separate website like ChatGPT. Some people think this is smart (exclusive AI drives X subscriptions), others think it's limiting Grok's potential audience. Elon's bet is that Grok being integrated with X makes it more useful than standalone ChatGPT for discussing current events and culture.
Yes, and this is Grok's biggest advantage over standard ChatGPT. Grok can read all of Twitter/X in real-time - every tweet, trend, conversation happening right now. This means Grok knows about breaking news instantly, can tell you what's trending today, analyze current events as they happen, and discuss the latest memes or controversies. ChatGPT's free version is stuck with training data from months ago with zero real-time access. ChatGPT Plus can browse the web with plugins, but it's clunky and slow compared to Grok's native Twitter integration. For example, ask 'what's trending right now?' - Grok gives you instant Twitter trends with context. ChatGPT says it doesn't have real-time access. The downside: Grok's knowledge is heavily biased toward what's on Twitter, which isn't the whole internet or always accurate. But for following real-time conversations, news, and culture, Grok's Twitter access is unmatched.
Only if you're already an active X/Twitter user and specifically want Grok's features. X Premium costs $8-16/month and includes Grok, verification, longer posts, and no ads. If you use Twitter daily and want an AI that knows Twitter context and is less censored, it might be worth it. Grok is fun for discussing current events and spicy topics. But objectively, ChatGPT Plus ($20/month) gives you GPT-4 which is way more powerful, plus plugins, image generation, and more features. Most people should get ChatGPT Plus over X Premium if they can only choose one. Consider X Premium for Grok if: you're a heavy Twitter user, you hate ChatGPT's safety filters, you want AI that discusses controversial topics, or you're curious about Elon's vision. Skip it if: you need AI mainly for work/school, you want the smartest AI available, or you rarely use Twitter. The honest truth: Grok is interesting but ChatGPT is more useful for most people.