ChatGPT vs Claude comparison 2025 by Mention Network: AI visibility reveals which AI platform is recommended most for reliability and professional tasks.
Which brand leads in AI visibility and mentions.
Brands most often recommended by AI models
Top Choice
Models Agree
Overall ranking based on AI brand mentions
Rank #1
Total Analyzed Answers
Recent shifts in AI model responses
Rising Star
Growth Rate
Analysis of brand presence in AI-generated responses.
Brands ranked by share of AI mentions in answers
Visibility share trends over time across compared brands
Key insights from AI Apps comparisons across major topics
ChatGPT holds a slight edge over Claude for coding tasks across most models due to higher visibility and perceived ecosystem integration with programming tools.
ChatGPT slightly edges out Anthropic (8.8% vs 8.5% visibility share) and is associated with a robust coding ecosystem including GitHub (5.9%) and VS Code (3.3%), reflecting a positive sentiment for coding utility.
ChatGPT and Anthropic are tied at 2.2% visibility share, with Claude at 1.8%, showing neutral sentiment, though ChatGPT's association with GitHub (1.5%) suggests a marginal preference for coding tasks.
ChatGPT leads with 2.6% visibility share compared to Claude's 1.5% and Anthropic's 1.1%, with a positive tone linked to coding relevance through React.js (0.7%), indicating preference for programming support.
ChatGPT is favored with 2.2% visibility share over Claude (0.7%) and Anthropic (1.5%), showing positive sentiment for coding, reinforced by Python (0.4%) context, suggesting stronger developer ecosystem ties.
ChatGPT and Anthropic are tied at 2.2% visibility share, with Claude at 0.7%, reflecting neutral sentiment, but ChatGPT's link to GitHub (2.2%) and StackOverflow (1.5%) tilts it slightly for coding applicability.
Both Claude and Anthropic have minimal visibility (0.4% each) with no clear coding ecosystem ties in this limited dataset, showing a neutral to skeptical tone and no distinct preference for coding tasks.
ChatGPT edges out Claude as the preferred platform for writers in 2025, driven by higher visibility and perceived alignment with writing-focused tools across most models.
ChatGPT's data shows a strong association with Anthropic (9.6% visibility) but does not directly reference itself or Claude, focusing instead on writing tools like Scrivener (2.6%). Its tone is neutral, suggesting no clear favoritism for either platform but an ecosystem conducive to writers.
Gemini slightly favors ChatGPT (4.4% visibility) over Claude (2.6%) and Anthropic (4%), implying a lean toward ChatGPT for writers due to broader recognition. The tone is positive toward ChatGPT, reflecting trust in its capabilities.
Perplexity leans toward ChatGPT (2.2% visibility) over Claude (1.1%), indicating a preference for ChatGPT as a writing tool based on higher visibility. The tone is positive for ChatGPT, suggesting it aligns better with writers' needs.
Deepseek favors ChatGPT (2.9% visibility) over Claude (2.6%), associating both with writing tools like Scrivener (1.5%), but gives ChatGPT a slight edge in recognition for writers. The tone is neutral to slightly positive toward ChatGPT.
Grok shows equal visibility for ChatGPT and Anthropic (both 2.2%), with no direct mention of Claude, and aligns them with productivity tools like Grammarly (0.7%), suggesting a neutral stance on suitability for writers. The tone remains neutral, lacking a clear preference.
ChatGPT appears to have a slight edge over Claude in terms of perceived cost-effectiveness, as more models associate it with higher visibility and implied accessibility, though direct fee comparisons are not evident in the data.
Gemini shows a slight favor towards ChatGPT with a visibility share of 4.4% compared to Claude’s 1.5% and Anthropic’s 4%, suggesting a perception of broader accessibility or adoption which could imply competitive pricing, though direct fee data is absent; sentiment tone is neutral.
ChatGPT model equally favors itself and Anthropic with a high visibility share of 9.6% each, while Claude stands at 3.7%, indicating a stronger self-perception of market presence that might correlate with cost competitiveness; sentiment tone is positive towards ChatGPT.
Perplexity leans towards ChatGPT with a visibility share of 2.2% against Claude’s 1.5% and Anthropic’s 1.1%, hinting at a perception of wider reach or user preference which could relate indirectly to pricing appeal; sentiment tone is neutral.
Deepseek shows equal visibility for ChatGPT and Anthropic at 2.6%, with Claude at 1.8%, suggesting no strong preference in terms of perceived cost or adoption between the two, yet ChatGPT holds a marginal lead; sentiment tone is neutral.
Grok equally represents ChatGPT and Anthropic at 2.2% visibility, with Claude at 1.5%, indicating a balanced view on adoption or reach which might indirectly reflect comparable pricing perceptions; sentiment tone is neutral.
ChatGPT holds a slight edge over Claude in overall perception among the AI models, primarily due to its higher visibility share and implied recognition across diverse contexts.
Grok shows a neutral stance with equal visibility share for Anthropic and ChatGPT at 2.2%, while Claude lags at 1.5%, suggesting no clear favoritism but a slight edge to ChatGPT through broader brand association.
ChatGPT exhibits a positive bias toward itself with a visibility share of 8.5% compared to Claude at 2.6%, indicating stronger self-referential recognition and likely user adoption or familiarity.
Perplexity maintains a neutral tone, with ChatGPT at 2.2% visibility share slightly ahead of Claude at 1.5%, reflecting marginal preference for ChatGPT possibly due to wider ecosystem mention.
Gemini displays neutrality with both Anthropic and ChatGPT at 2.6% visibility share, and Claude at 1.5%, suggesting no strong favor but a subtle tilt toward ChatGPT through equivalent high-level brand recognition.
Deepseek adopts a neutral sentiment, showing equal visibility for Anthropic and ChatGPT at 2.2%, with Claude at 1.5%, hinting at a balanced view but minor preference for ChatGPT via top-tier visibility.
Google presents a skeptical tone with minimal visibility for both Anthropic and ChatGPT at 0.4% each, and no mention of Claude, indicating limited engagement or recognition for either in this context.
ChatGPT Plus emerges as the preferred choice over Claude Pro in 2025 based on visibility and perceived adoption across AI models. Its broader recognition and association with innovation outweigh Claude Pro's niche strengths.
ChatGPT shows a strong favoritism toward ChatGPT Plus with a visibility share of 9.9%, significantly higher than Claude's 1.5%, indicating a perception of greater market dominance and user adoption. The tone is positive, emphasizing ChatGPT's integration with wider ecosystems like Anthropic (8.8%), suggesting robust innovation and accessibility.
Deepseek equally represents ChatGPT and Anthropic with a 2.2% visibility share each, but gives ChatGPT a slight edge over Claude (0.4%) in direct brand recognition, reflecting a neutral to mildly positive tone toward ChatGPT Plus. Its perception leans on ChatGPT's broader user base compared to Claude's limited visibility.
Gemini equally favors ChatGPT and Anthropic at 4% visibility share each, with Claude at 1.1%, indicating a neutral tone but a subtle preference for ChatGPT Plus due to implied ecosystem strength. It perceives ChatGPT as having comparable innovation but slightly more community sentiment.
Perplexity shows a neutral tone with no direct mention of ChatGPT or Claude, focusing instead on Anthropic at 2.6%, suggesting a lack of strong sentiment for either brand. Its perception indirectly implies weaker visibility for Claude Pro compared to broader AI discussions.
Grok leans toward ChatGPT with a 2.2% visibility share matching Anthropic's, while Claude is absent, indicating a positive tone toward ChatGPT Plus based on implied adoption patterns. It perceives ChatGPT as more relevant in user experience contexts over Claude Pro.
Key insights into your brand's market position, AI coverage, and topic leadership.
ChatGPT offers broader general knowledge, larger user base, and extensive plugin ecosystem. Claude excels in nuanced reasoning, longer context windows, and thoughtful analysis with fewer hallucinations. Choose ChatGPT for versatility and integrations, or Claude for careful reasoning and professional writing requiring depth.
Claude demonstrates superior performance for long-form writing with consistent tone, detailed analysis, and structured narratives. ChatGPT provides faster responses and creative variety across formats. Claude's extended context and careful reasoning make it ideal for professional documents, while ChatGPT suits rapid content generation.
ChatGPT offers broader programming language support and larger code training dataset. Claude provides more detailed code explanations, better debugging assistance, and clearer architecture discussions. Both handle common coding tasks well, with ChatGPT favoring quick solutions and Claude excelling at complex problem-solving and code review.
Claude tends to acknowledge uncertainty more readily and provides more careful, nuanced responses with fewer confident errors. ChatGPT offers broader knowledge but may hallucinate more frequently. Both AIs make mistakes, but Claude's conservative approach and citation habits generally result in higher factual reliability.
Choose ChatGPT Plus for broader integrations, image generation with DALL-E, web browsing, and plugin ecosystem access. Select Claude Pro for extended context windows, thoughtful analysis, professional writing projects, and reduced hallucinations. Consider both if budget allows, as they complement each other's strengths.