DeepSeek vs ChatGPT

DeepSeek and ChatGPT share equal visibility at 4% each, indicating no favoritism from this model. The neutral tone suggests DeepSeek perceives both AI tools as comparable in relevance for user needs.

Gemini assigns equal 4% visibility to both DeepSeek and ChatGPT, reflecting a balanced view with a neutral sentiment. It does not prioritize one over the other, focusing instead on their similar recognition in user queries.

Grok equally distributes visibility at 4% to both DeepSeek and ChatGPT, showing no bias and maintaining a neutral tone. Its perception aligns with other models, viewing both AIs as equally relevant for user suitability.

ChatGPT gives slightly lower visibility to both itself and DeepSeek at 3% each, yet remains neutral in tone with no clear preference. This suggests a modest self-assessment but no strong differentiation in user fit between the two.

Perplexity equally recognizes DeepSeek and ChatGPT with 4% visibility each, adopting a neutral sentiment. It perceives both as equally accessible and relevant options for users without favoring one.

DeepSeek and ChatGPT share equal visibility at 4%, with no favoring of one over the other or indication of copying; the tone is neutral as it includes both brands alongside unrelated ones like Windows.

Grok perceives DeepSeek and ChatGPT with identical 4% visibility shares, showing no bias or suggestion of copying; the tone remains neutral with self-reference to Grok at 1% visibility.

ChatGPT assigns equal 4% visibility to both DeepSeek and itself, without hinting at derivation or dependency; the neutral tone is evident as other brands like Meta and Alibaba are also mentioned without competitive framing.

Perplexity shows no preference between DeepSeek and ChatGPT, both at 4% visibility, with no language or data suggesting copying; its neutral tone is supported by the inclusion of diverse brands like BBC and Bloomberg.

Gemini equally recognizes DeepSeek and ChatGPT at 4% visibility, with no implications of one being derived from the other; the tone is neutral, focusing on brand presence alongside unrelated entities like Toyota.

Gemini shows no favoritism between DeepSeek and ChatGPT for math capabilities, with both holding a 4% visibility share. Its neutral tone and inclusion of other math tools like WolframAlpha and Python suggest a balanced view without specific bias.

DeepSeek does not favor itself over ChatGPT in math, reflecting a neutral sentiment with equal 4% visibility shares for both. The lack of additional context or tools mentioned implies no distinct reasoning for superiority.

ChatGPT maintains a neutral stance, giving both itself and DeepSeek a 4% visibility share, with minor mentions of math tools like Mathematica and SymPy. This suggests an unbiased perception with no clear edge in math performance.

Grok exhibits a neutral tone, assigning equal 4% visibility shares to DeepSeek and ChatGPT, while also referencing a broad ecosystem of math-related resources like WolframAlpha and arXiv. This indicates no preference for either in math capabilities, focusing instead on diverse tools.

Perplexity remains neutral, with DeepSeek and ChatGPT both at 4% visibility share, and a slight nod to WolframAlpha at 3%. Its perception lacks specific reasoning to favor one over the other in math performance.

Perplexity shows equal visibility for DeepSeek and ChatGPT at 4% each, with no clear favorability or environmental context; its tone is neutral. The inclusion of Greenspector at 1% might suggest a minor nod to environmental considerations, but it lacks direct linkage to either brand.

ChatGPT data reflects equal visibility for DeepSeek and ChatGPT at 4% each, with no preference or environmental insight; the tone remains neutral. Associated brands like NVIDIA (2%) offer no relevant context for environmental impact.

DeepSeek mirrors the equal visibility of 4% for both itself and ChatGPT, showing no bias or environmental focus; its tone is neutral. The data lacks any specific reasoning tied to ecological considerations.

Grok assigns equal visibility of 4% to both DeepSeek and ChatGPT, indicating no favoritism or environmental angle; the tone is neutral. The higher visibility of Windows (4%) does not contribute to insights on environmental impact.

Gemini equally represents DeepSeek and ChatGPT at 4% visibility, with no preference or environmental implications; the tone is neutral. There is no data-driven reasoning linking either brand to environmental benefits or drawbacks.

Grok shows no favoritism between ChatGPT and DeepSeek, assigning both a visibility share of 4% out of a diverse brand landscape. Its neutral tone suggests no perceived difference in accuracy.

DeepSeek perceives itself and ChatGPT equally with a 4% visibility share, reflecting a neutral stance without favoring one over the other in terms of accuracy.

Perplexity assigns equal visibility of 4% to both ChatGPT and DeepSeek, indicating a neutral sentiment and no clear preference for accuracy between the two.

Gemini views ChatGPT and DeepSeek identically with a 4% visibility share each, maintaining a neutral tone without suggesting superior accuracy for either.

ChatGPT perceives itself and DeepSeek equally with a 4% visibility share, adopting a neutral perspective with no implication of differing accuracy levels.