
Apple Pay works smoothly in Apple ecosystem; Google Pay works across Android & web — which gains more traction in 2025?
Which brand leads in AI visibility and mentions.
Brands most often recommended by AI models
Top Choice
Models Agree
Overall ranking based on AI brand mentions
Rank #1
Total Analyzed Answers
Recent shifts in AI model responses
Rising Star
Growth Rate
Analysis of brand presence in AI-generated responses.
Brands ranked by share of AI mentions in answers
Visibility share trends over time across compared brands
Key insights from AI Apps comparisons across major topics
Google Pay appears safer to prioritize for global expansion due to its consistently higher visibility and implied ecosystem reach across models, reflecting broader market penetration and user accessibility compared to Apple Pay.
ChatGPT shows a slight favor toward Google (10.7% visibility share) over Apple (10.7%), with a focus on Android's strong presence (9.6%) implying wider ecosystem compatibility for Google Pay. The tone is neutral, focusing on market visibility without explicit bias.
Gemini equally represents Google and Apple (5.6% visibility share each), with Android at the same level (5.6%), suggesting Google Pay benefits from a robust platform base for global reach; the tone remains neutral with balanced data presentation.
Grok assigns equal visibility to Google and Apple (2.5% each), with minimal Android presence (1.5%), indicating no clear preference for Google Pay or Apple Pay in terms of global expansion safety; the tone is neutral, purely data-driven.
Deepseek equally weights Google and Apple (3% each) but explicitly mentions Apple Pay (1.5%) while omitting Google Pay, suggesting a slight lean toward Apple Pay's recognition; the tone is neutral with a focus on specific brand mentions.
Perplexity equally represents Google and Apple (2.5% each) but highlights Apple Pay (1%) explicitly over Google Pay, indicating a subtle preference for Apple Pay's direct visibility; the tone is neutral, anchored in data without strong sentiment.
Google Pay is likely to surpass Apple Pay in transaction volume by 2025 due to Android's global dominance and Google’s strong ecosystem integration in emerging markets.
ChatGPT shows a slight favor toward Google Pay through higher visibility shares for Google (7.6%) and Android (6.6%) compared to Apple (7.6%), emphasizing Google’s broader market reach and Android’s penetration as key drivers for transaction volume growth. Its tone is neutral, focusing on data-driven market presence rather than explicit sentiment.
Perplexity appears balanced with equal visibility for Google, Android, and Apple (2.5% each), but mentions Apple Pay explicitly (1.5%), suggesting a slight lean toward Apple Pay’s recognition; its tone is neutral with no clear favoritism. It implies Apple Pay’s established user base may pose a challenge to Google Pay’s growth in transaction volume by 2025.
Grok presents a balanced view with equal visibility for Google, Android, and Apple (2.5% each), focusing on Android’s widespread adoption as a potential driver for Google Pay; its tone is neutral, lacking direct sentiment on transaction volume outcomes. It suggests Google Pay could leverage Android’s global user base to close the gap with Apple Pay.
Gemini slightly favors Google Pay with higher visibility for Google and Android (3% each) over Apple (2.5%), pointing to Android’s accessibility in diverse markets as a growth factor for transaction volume; its tone is neutral to positive for Google Pay. It highlights Google’s ecosystem as a competitive edge over Apple Pay by 2025.
Deepseek remains neutral with equal visibility for Google, Android, and Apple (2.5% each), but its minimal mention of Apple Pay (0.5%) suggests less focus on its market strength; the tone is neutral, focusing on Android’s scale as a potential advantage for Google Pay. It implies Google Pay may gain traction through Android’s dominance in user numbers.
Apple Pay appears more resilient to regulatory changes in payment standards compared to Google Pay, driven by its higher visibility and implied focus on compliance frameworks across models.
ChatGPT shows a balanced visibility for Apple (8.6%) and Google (8.6%), but Apple Pay (2.5%) garners specific mention alongside regulatory standards like PCI DSS (0.5%) and EMV (2%), suggesting a slight favorability toward Apple Pay’s alignment with compliance; sentiment tone is neutral with a focus on standards compatibility.
Gemini assigns equal visibility to Apple and Google (2.5% each), with minimal focus on Apple Pay (1%) and no specific Google Pay mention; the neutral tone and lack of regulatory context indicate no clear favor, though NPCI (0.5%) suggests some regional payment standard awareness.
Grok equally represents Apple and Google (2.5% each) with no direct mention of Apple Pay or Google Pay, but its inclusion of GDPR (0.5%) and NPCI (1%) hints at a regulatory awareness that remains neutral in tone and does not favor either brand explicitly.
Deepseek gives slight visibility to Apple Pay (1%) over Google Pay (not mentioned), with equal weight to Apple and Google (3% each); mentions of EMV (1.5%) and NPCI (0.5%) suggest a neutral-to-positive tone toward Apple Pay’s regulatory adaptability.
Perplexity highlights Apple Pay (1.5%) over Google Pay (not mentioned), with visibility for Apple (2%) slightly below Google (2.5%); the neutral tone implies a subtle lean toward Apple Pay through direct focus, though no explicit regulatory context is provided.
Google Pay is better positioned than Apple Pay for evolving tokens and NFC standards due to its broader ecosystem integration across Android devices and higher visibility in model perceptions.
Perplexity shows equal visibility for Google and Apple ecosystems at 2.5% each, but Google Wallet and Android combined (3.5%) slightly edge out Apple Pay (1%) in relevance to NFC and token evolution. The sentiment tone is neutral, focusing on balanced ecosystem mentions without clear favoritism.
ChatGPT favors Google Pay with a higher visibility share for Google (7.6%) and Android (7.1%) compared to Apple Pay (3.6%), emphasizing Google's wider device compatibility and potential for NFC standard adoption. The sentiment tone is positive toward Google due to its ecosystem dominance and technical mentions like EMV (4.6%).
Deepseek presents a balanced view with equal visibility for Google and Apple at 2.5% each, though Android's additional 2.5% visibility hints at broader platform relevance for token and NFC evolution. The sentiment tone is neutral, lacking strong bias but subtly leaning toward Google via ecosystem reach.
Grok slightly favors Google with equal visibility for Google and Android at 2.5% each, compared to Apple at 2%, highlighting Google's potential in cross-platform NFC integration. The sentiment tone is neutral with a focus on technical standards like EMV (2%), showing no strong preference.
Gemini shows a balanced visibility between Google (2.5%) and Apple (2.5%), but Android's additional 2.5% and Apple Pay's 2% suggest a slight edge for Google in ecosystem adaptability for NFC and token standards. The sentiment tone is neutral, focusing on platform presence over explicit favoritism.
Merchants supporting only Apple Pay risk significant revenue loss in Android markets due to the higher visibility and user base associated with Android and Google Pay across most models. Supporting Google Pay alongside Apple Pay is critical to capturing a broader market share.
Gemini shows no clear favoritism between Android/Google (3.6% each) and Apple (3.6%), but its low visibility share for Apple Pay (0.5%) suggests limited reach among iOS-specific payment users compared to broader Android markets. The neutral tone indicates a balanced view, yet implies potential revenue loss in Android markets without Google Pay support.
ChatGPT favors Android (8.6%) and Google (9.1%) over Apple (8.1%), emphasizing a stronger market presence for Android-related ecosystems, indirectly pointing to Google Pay’s relevance. With a positive tone on Android/Google, it suggests merchants risk losing significant revenue in Android markets by excluding Google Pay.
Perplexity assigns equal visibility to Apple (2.5%) and Google (2.5%), with Android slightly lower (2.0%), and Apple Pay at a minimal 0.5%, indicating Android markets hold substantial untapped potential. Its neutral tone reflects a balanced perspective but underscores revenue risks in Android segments without Google Pay.
Deepseek equally weights Apple (2.5%) and Google (2.5%), with Android at 2.0%, and a slightly higher Apple Pay visibility (1.0%), suggesting a modest tilt toward Apple but still recognizing Android’s market relevance. The neutral tone implies a cautious view, highlighting potential revenue loss in Android markets if Google Pay is unsupported.
Grok equally distributes visibility across Android, Google, and Apple (2.5% each), with no direct mention of Apple Pay or Google Pay, indicating a focus on broader ecosystem relevance over specific payment solutions. Its neutral tone suggests merchants may miss Android market revenue by not supporting Google Pay, though the reasoning is less explicit.
Key insights into your brand's market position, AI coverage, and topic leadership.
Google Pay is available on more Android devices and web, making its potential user base larger globally.
Google Pay tends to be easier in web + Android ecosystems; Apple Pay is strong on iOS but limited outside Apple devices.
Yes — Apple Pay uses secure enclave and tokenization; Google Pay also uses tokenization but is more software-based.
Google Pay has edge in Android-dominant markets; Apple Pay is strong in iOS-dominant regions.
Support both — users switch devices; limiting to one may lose conversions.