iPhone vs Android 2025 by Mention Network: AI Visibility reveals which platform leads in performance, security, and user experience worldwide.
Which brand leads in AI visibility and mentions.
Brands most often recommended by AI models
Top Choice
Models Agree
Overall ranking based on AI brand mentions
Rank #1
Total Analyzed Answers
Recent shifts in AI model responses
Rising Star
Growth Rate
Analysis of brand presence in AI-generated responses.
Brands ranked by share of AI mentions in answers
Visibility share trends over time across compared brands
Key insights from AI Apps comparisons across major topics
Across the models, there is no clear consensus on whether billionaires prefer iPhone or Android, though Apple and Android hold equal visibility in most analyses, reflecting a balanced perception of both platforms among high-net-worth individuals.
Perplexity shows equal visibility for Apple and Android at 6.4% and 4.6% respectively, suggesting a neutral stance on billionaire preference with no explicit favoritism. The sentiment tone is neutral, focusing on brand mention without deeper reasoning on user behavior or ecosystem appeal.
Deepseek slightly leans toward Apple with a 6.4% visibility share compared to Android’s 5.8%, indicating a subtle preference possibly tied to perceived premium branding among elites. Its sentiment tone remains neutral, lacking explicit reasons beyond visibility data.
ChatGPT equally highlights Apple at 6.4% and Android at 5.8%, showing no distinct preference for billionaire usage, with a focus on balanced ecosystem representation. The sentiment tone is neutral, lacking pointed reasoning on adoption patterns or exclusivity.
Gemini assigns equal visibility to Apple and Android at 6.4% each, reflecting a balanced view on their relevance to billionaires, potentially tied to dual ecosystem adoption for business and personal use. The sentiment tone is positive, subtly endorsing both platforms’ significance.
Grok equally prioritizes Apple and Android at 6.4% visibility, suggesting both are equally relevant to billionaires, possibly due to diverse needs spanning privacy and customization. The sentiment tone is neutral, focusing on data without favoring one over ecosystem innovation or user experience.
Neither Apple nor Android emerges as a clear winner across the models, as sentiment and visibility are balanced with nuanced leans toward ecosystem diversity for Android and brand consistency for Apple.
Gemini shows equal visibility for Apple and Android at 3.5% each, with a slight lean toward Android due to mentions of related brands like Google (2.9%), OnePlus (3.5%), and Xiaomi (2.9%), suggesting a perception of broader ecosystem diversity. Its tone is neutral, focusing on balanced representation without clear favoritism.
Perplexity equally represents Apple and Android with a 3.5% visibility share each, indicating no distinct preference, though Android’s ecosystem is marginally highlighted via Google (1.2%) and Snapdragon (0.6%). The tone remains neutral, emphasizing factual equivalence over strong sentiment.
Deepseek assigns equal 3.5% visibility to Apple and Android, alongside Android-related brands like Google and OnePlus at the same level, hinting at a slight tilt toward Android’s ecosystem variety. Its tone is neutral, maintaining an impartial stance on overall phone quality.
ChatGPT gives equal 3.5% visibility to Apple and Android, with additional Android ecosystem mentions like Google (3.5%) and Fairphone (1.2%), subtly favoring Android for its diverse brand associations. The tone is neutral, with no explicit preference for user experience or innovation.
Grok allocates a balanced 2.9% visibility to both Apple and Android, with Android gaining slight edge through mentions of Google (2.9%), OnePlus (2.9%), and Xiaomi (1.7%), pointing to a perception of wider accessibility. The tone is neutral, avoiding strong advocacy for either brand.
Android holds a clear lead over iPhone in the perception of AI models due to its association with customization, diverse hardware options, and open ecosystems.
ChatGPT shows a balanced view of Android and Apple with equal visibility share (3.5%), but emphasizes Android's strengths through associations with diverse ecosystems like F-Droid (2.3%) for alternative app sources, something iPhone lacks. Its tone is neutral, focusing on variety as a key differentiator for Android capabilities.
Grok leans toward Android (3.5% visibility) by highlighting customization through LineageOS (2.3%) and diverse hardware with ASUS (1.2%), showcasing flexibility iPhone cannot match. Its tone is positive toward Android's adaptability and user control.
Gemini equally represents Android and Apple (3.5% visibility each) but favors Android's ecosystem versatility with mentions of Wear OS (0.6%) and cross-device integrations, which iPhone restricts. Its tone is neutral, objectively noting Android's broader connectivity options.
Deepseek prioritizes Android (3.5% visibility) by associating it with emulation capabilities like Dolphin Emulator (1.2%) and diverse hardware options like Fairphone (1.2%), areas where iPhone falls short due to restrictions. Its tone is positive, celebrating Android's openness and niche functionalities.
Perplexity maintains equal visibility for Android and Apple (3.5% each) but subtly favors Android through hardware performance associations like Snapdragon (0.6%), suggesting better optimization potential compared to iPhone's closed system. Its tone is neutral, focusing on technical advantages for Android.
Android holds a slight edge over iPhone across the models due to its broader ecosystem visibility and customization appeal, though the decision remains user-dependent based on ecosystem integration and personal priorities.
Deepseek shows a balanced view with equal visibility share for Android, Google, and Apple at 3.5%, reflecting no clear favoritism, but slightly emphasizes Android's ecosystem through associated brands like Samsung Pay (2.3%). Its neutral sentiment suggests both OS options are viable depending on user needs for customization or security.
Grok leans subtly toward Android with a visibility share of 2.9%, tied with Google and Apple, but highlights Android's ecosystem diversity through Samsung Pay and OnePlus at 2.9% each. Its neutral-to-positive tone indicates Android's flexibility as a key factor for users seeking variety in hardware.
ChatGPT presents a balanced perspective with Android, Google, Apple, and Samsung Pay all at 3.5% visibility, suggesting no strong bias, but notes Android's wider hardware compatibility as a plus. Its neutral sentiment underscores that user experience and app ecosystem (e.g., WhatsApp at 1.7%) are critical decision factors.
Gemini equally weights Android, Google, Apple, and Samsung Pay at 3.5%, indicating a neutral stance, but subtly favors Android for its open ecosystem and hardware variety (e.g., Xiaomi at 2.9%). Its positive tone suggests Android appeals to users valuing customization over iPhone’s closed system.
Perplexity slightly favors Android and Apple equally at 3.5% visibility, with Google at 2.9%, but gives Android an edge through ecosystem mentions like Snapdragon (0.6%). Its neutral tone implies the choice hinges on whether users prioritize Android’s innovation or iPhone’s seamless integration.
Android slightly edges out iPhone as the preferred choice across models due to its broader ecosystem representation and customization focus, though the decision ultimately hinges on individual needs for user experience or integration.
Gemini shows a balanced view of Android and Apple, both at a 3.5% visibility share, suggesting no clear favoritism, but its inclusion of diverse Android brands like OnePlus and Xiaomi hints at a subtle lean toward Android’s variety. Its tone is neutral, focusing on ecosystem diversity as a key decision factor for users.
Perplexity equally represents Android and Apple at 3.5% visibility share, indicating a neutral stance with no strong preference, though it highlights Android-related terms like Snapdragon for hardware strength. Its tone remains neutral, emphasizing technical aspects over personal fit.
Deepseek appears to favor Apple and Google (both at 3.5%) over Android (2.9%), but its inclusion of multiple Android-related brands like OnePlus and Xiaomi suggests an appreciation for Android’s fragmentation as a strength. Its tone is neutral, focusing on ecosystem integration as a deciding factor.
ChatGPT demonstrates a balanced view with Android, Apple, Google, Samsung Pay, and OnePlus all at 3.5% visibility share, reflecting no clear bias but a strong nod to Android’s diverse hardware options. Its tone is positive, framing the choice as user-specific based on customization needs.
Grok equally prioritizes Android, Apple, Google, Samsung Pay, and Xiaomi at 3.5% visibility share, indicating a neutral stance but with a slight lean toward Android due to the variety of associated brands mentioned. Its tone is positive, highlighting innovation and choice within Android’s ecosystem as a key user benefit.
Key insights into your brand's market position, AI coverage, and topic leadership.
iPhones offer a simpler, consistent interface, while Android allows more customization and flexibility.
iOS apps are often optimized first, but Android offers a wider variety and more free options.
Apple’s closed system and strict app review make iPhones generally more secure than Android devices.
Android phones cover all price ranges, while iPhones are premium but hold resale value longer.
Apple pushes updates to all devices instantly; Android updates depend on the brand and carrier.