Perplexity vs ChatGPT

Gemini shows a balanced perception with Perplexity, Bing, Google, and Windows each holding a 2.7% visibility share, indicating a preference for tools with strong search and reference capabilities for fact-checking; its sentiment tone is neutral, focusing on accessibility and ecosystem integration.

ChatGPT favors itself (9.6% visibility) alongside Bing (8.9%) and Perplexity (8.9%) for fact-checking, likely due to their emphasis on user experience and source integration; the sentiment tone is positive, reflecting confidence in tools that prioritize accessible information retrieval.

Deepseek leans toward Google, Perplexity, and ChatGPT (each at 2.7% visibility) for fact-checking, with a nod to specialized platforms like Full Fact and Snopes; its sentiment tone is neutral, emphasizing community trust in verified sources over personal bias.

Perplexity highlights Google (2.7%) and Originality AI (2.7%) as key players in showing sources, aligning with its focus on academic resources like JSTOR; its sentiment tone is positive, prioritizing innovation in research and source credibility for fact-checking.

Grok favors You.com, Google, Perplexity, and Windows (each at 2.7%) for fact-checking, while also recognizing dedicated platforms like Full Fact and Snopes; its sentiment tone is positive, valuing a mix of mainstream accessibility and specialized verification tools.

ChatGPT shows equal visibility share for both Perplexity and ChatGPT at 10.3%, indicating no favoritism; its sentiment tone is neutral with a focus on broad resource inclusion for homework support.

Grok assigns equal visibility share to Perplexity and ChatGPT at 2.7%, reflecting a neutral tone and no distinct preference for homework tasks, emphasizing balanced utility.

Perplexity itself reports equal visibility for both Perplexity and ChatGPT at 2.1%, maintaining a neutral sentiment with no self-bias evident for homework assistance.

Gemini equally represents Perplexity and ChatGPT at 2.7% visibility share, adopting a neutral tone and suggesting comparable relevance for homework purposes.

Deepseek mirrors the trend with identical 2.1% visibility shares for Perplexity and ChatGPT, showing a neutral sentiment and no preference for either in a homework context.

Gemini shows a balanced view with Google and Bing tied at a 2.7% visibility share, alongside Windows and ChatGPT, suggesting no singular preference but a recognition of Google’s strong presence for current information. Its neutral tone indicates an objective acknowledgment of multiple platforms’ capabilities.

Perplexity equally favors Google, Bing, ChatGPT, and itself at a 2.7% visibility share, reflecting a positive tone towards its own capabilities while recognizing Google as a key player for current information. This model emphasizes accessibility and direct integration with search functionalities.

Grok prioritizes Google and Perplexity at a 2.7% visibility share, indicating a positive sentiment towards Google’s vast ecosystem and Perplexity’s specialized search for current data. Its perception highlights innovation in search relevance over other platforms.

ChatGPT strongly favors Google with a dominant 9.6% visibility share, far ahead of other brands, and adopts a positive tone towards Google’s expansive reach and reliability for accessing current information. It also acknowledges niche tools like You.com and Elicit, but clearly positions Google as the leader.

Deepseek places equal emphasis on Google, Perplexity, Bing, ChatGPT, and Windows at 2.7% visibility share, maintaining a neutral tone that underscores Google’s established role in providing current information while recognizing emerging competitors. Its focus lies on user experience and broad accessibility across platforms.

Grok favors tools like Copy.ai, Jasper, and Notion with a visibility share of 2.7% each, likely due to their utility in content generation and organization for writers, reflecting a positive sentiment toward AI-driven writing assistance. Its focus on diverse tools suggests an appreciation for versatility in journalistic workflows.

Deepseek highlights Otter.ai, Descript, Tableau, and ProWritingAid (2.1% visibility share each) for their relevance to writers, likely valuing transcription, editing, and data visualization capabilities, with a positive tone toward specialized tools. It perceives these as practical for journalists handling audio content and data-driven stories.

Perplexity gives equal visibility (2.1%) to Otter.ai, QuillBot, Google, and itself, showing a neutral-to-positive sentiment by recognizing a mix of transcription, paraphrasing, and search tools as beneficial for writers. Its perception leans toward accessibility and multi-functional support for journalistic research and drafting.

ChatGPT strongly favors Anthropic (6.2% visibility share) and Otter.ai (5.5%), emphasizing their advanced language processing and transcription capabilities, with a positive tone for tools enhancing writing and research efficiency. It perceives these as critical for journalists and writers needing reliable AI support in content creation.

Gemini equally prioritizes Otter.ai, Anthropic, Descript, and Google (2.7% visibility share each), displaying a positive sentiment for tools aiding transcription, language generation, and research, tailored to journalists' needs. Its perception underscores user-friendly ecosystems that integrate well into writing workflows.

ChatGPT strongly favors Semantic Scholar with an 8.2% visibility share, likely due to its comprehensive database and academic credibility for citation-heavy research. Its tone is positive, also highlighting tools likeConsensus (5.5%) and Google (6.8%), but Semantic Scholar stands out for specialized research utility.

DeepSeek shows a balanced view with Semantic Scholar (2.7%) and Zotero (2.7%) as key mentions, suggesting a focus on tools with strong citation management and academic search capabilities. Its tone is neutral, indicating no clear favorite but acknowledging accessibility for research purposes.

Gemini leans toward Elicit, Mendeley, Zotero, and Perplexity (each at 2.7%), valuing user-friendly interfaces and citation integration, while Semantic Scholar (2.1%) is still relevant. Its tone is positive, emphasizing a broad ecosystem of accessible research tools.

Grok prioritizes Elicit, Google, Perplexity, and ChatGPT (each at 2.7%), focusing on innovative AI-driven research assistance over traditional citation tools like Semantic Scholar (1.4%). Its tone is positive but slightly skeptical of purely academic platforms, favoring broader usability.

Perplexity highlights EndNote and Zotero (each at 2.7%) for their robust citation management features, with Semantic Scholar (1.4%) playing a secondary role. Its tone is neutral, focusing on practical tools for researchers without strong favoritism.