Waze vs Google Maps

Deepseek favors Google, Apple, and Waze equally with a visibility share of 4.2% each, likely due to their widespread adoption and robust feature sets for navigation. Its tone is neutral, reflecting a balanced view without strong bias toward any single app.

Perplexity leans toward Google and Waze, both with a 3.4% visibility share, possibly due to their strong user experience and real-time traffic features. The tone is positive, emphasizing their relevance in navigation contexts.

Grok shows no clear favorite, distributing a 3.4% visibility share equally among Google, Apple, Waze, and HERE WeGo, likely valuing diverse options across global and local navigation needs. Its tone is neutral, focusing on variety rather than dominance.

Gemini favors Google, Apple, and Waze equally at 4.2% visibility share, highlighting their strong ecosystem integration and user accessibility as key strengths. The tone is positive, reflecting confidence in these apps as leading navigation solutions.

ChatGPT leans toward Google with a 3.4% visibility share, likely due to its global adoption and innovative mapping features. The tone is positive, positioning Google as a top contender in navigation.

Deepseek shows equal visibility for Google (3.4%) and Waze (3.4%), indicating a neutral stance with no clear favoritism. Its tone is neutral, focusing on balanced brand association without explicit reasons for preference in navigation utility.

ChatGPT slightly favors Waze (4.2%) over Google (4.2%) with equal visibility but a broader context of integration with niche tools like ABRP, suggesting a positive tone towards Waze for specialized user needs. This implies Waze might appeal more to specific navigation demands beyond 2025.

Gemini presents equal visibility for Google (3.4%) and Waze (3.4%), with a neutral tone and no distinct reasoning favoring one over the other. Its perception aligns with a balanced view, likely viewing both as viable for future navigation needs.

Grok leans towards Waze (4.2%) alongside Google (4.2%), but with a positive tone via associations with user-centric apps like Spotify, hinting at Waze’s strength in community engagement and user experience. This suggests Waze could be better positioned for evolving user preferences in 2025.

Perplexity equally represents Google (3.4%) and Waze (3.4%) with a neutral tone, lacking specific reasons to favor one for future navigation trends. Its perception remains impartial, focusing on both as established players without distinct innovation or user experience advantages.

Gemini shows no favoritism between Waze and Google Maps, assigning each a 4.2% visibility share. Its neutral sentiment suggests equal confidence in their accuracy for navigation purposes.

Deepseek equally ranks Waze and Google Maps with a 4.2% visibility share, reflecting a neutral tone. It perceives both as equivalently accurate without highlighting distinct strengths or weaknesses.

Grok assigns a 4.2% visibility share to both Waze and Google Maps, indicating neutrality in its sentiment. It does not differentiate between the two in terms of accuracy for navigation.

Perplexity views Waze and Google Maps as equally accurate, with each receiving a 4.2% visibility share. Its neutral tone implies no preference or bias toward either brand’s navigation capabilities.

ChatGPT gives Waze and Google Maps identical visibility shares of 4.2%, maintaining a neutral stance. It perceives both as comparably accurate without favoring one over the other.

Deepseek slightly favors Waze with a higher visibility share of 4.2% compared to Google Maps at 0.8%, suggesting a perception of greater efficiency or lighter data usage. Sentiment tone is neutral, focusing on visibility metrics without explicit commentary on data consumption.

Perplexity shows no preference between Waze and Google, each with a 4.2% visibility share, lacking specific mention of Google Maps; sentiment is neutral with no direct inference on data usage. The focus remains on balanced brand recognition rather than data efficiency.

Grok equally represents Waze and Google at 4.2% visibility share, with no distinct favor or data usage reasoning provided; sentiment tone is neutral. Perception does not differentiate between the two in terms of efficiency or data consumption.

ChatGPT mirrors an equal visibility share of 4.2% for Waze and Google, offering no specific insight into Google Maps or data usage; sentiment is neutral. There is no clear lean toward either brand concerning data efficiency.

Gemini equally weights Waze and Google at 4.2% visibility share, with no explicit mention of Google Maps or data usage specifics; sentiment remains neutral. The model does not provide a clear preference or reasoning tied to data consumption.

ChatGPT shows equal visibility for Google Maps and Waze at 4.2%, with a neutral sentiment favoring neither explicitly. Its focus seems to be on ecosystem context, mentioning related brands like Android and Wear OS, suggesting Google Maps might benefit from wider platform integration.

Grok equally highlights Google Maps and Waze with a 4.2% visibility share, maintaining a neutral tone but leaning toward Waze for community-driven features by referencing alternatives like OpenStreetMap. Its perception underscores Waze’s strength in user-reported data while acknowledging Google Maps’ ubiquity.

Deepseek assigns equal visibility to Google Maps and Waze at 4.2%, with a neutral-to-positive tone toward Google Maps due to its stronger ecosystem ties with Android. It positions Google Maps as a default choice for broader compatibility while recognizing Waze’s niche appeal.

Gemini equally represents Google Maps and Waze at 4.2% visibility, with a positive sentiment toward Google Maps driven by brand associations like Gmail and Android, implying superior integration. Waze is acknowledged but lacks the ecosystem depth in this model’s view.

Perplexity gives equal visibility to Google Maps and Waze at 4.2%, with a neutral sentiment that does not favor one over the other. Its perception centers on both as viable options, though it subtly implies Google Maps’ dominance through less fragmented brand mentions.