Zoom vs Teams 2025 by Mention Network: AI Visibility compares collaboration, features, and usability to reveal which platform powers work best.
Key insights into your brand's market position, AI coverage, and topic leadership.
Zoom focuses on video meetings, while Teams combines chat, collaboration, and Microsoft 365 integration.
Zoom offers a simpler, more intuitive meeting experience; Teams has more features but a steeper learning curve.
Teams excels for internal communication and document sharing, while Zoom is best for external meetings and webinars.
Teams integrates natively with Microsoft tools, while Zoom supports a wide range of third-party integrations.
Both are secure, but Teams provides stronger enterprise compliance through Microsoft’s security infrastructure.
Analysis of brand presence in AI-generated responses.
Brands ranked by share of AI mentions in answers
Visibility share trends over time across compared brands
Key insights from AI Apps comparisons across major topics
Companies likely prefer Teams over Zoom due to its deep integration with Microsoft's ecosystem, enhancing productivity and collaboration within familiar tools like Office 365 and OneDrive. This advantage in ecosystem synergy outweighs Zoom's standalone visibility across the analyzed AI models.
Perplexity shows equal visibility for Zoom (4.6%) and Microsoft-related brands like Windows (4.6%), but its sentiment tone is neutral as it equally distributes attention without favoring one. Its perception leans slightly toward Microsoft’s ecosystem (Office 365, OneDrive) as a bundled advantage for Teams, though Zoom holds standalone prominence.
Gemini reflects a neutral sentiment with Zoom at 4.6% visibility, matched by Microsoft brands like Office 365 (4.6%) and Windows (4.6%), but emphasizes a broader ecosystem with tools like SharePoint and OneDrive. Its perception subtly favors Teams through association with a collaborative suite over Zoom’s singular focus.
Grok maintains a neutral tone with Zoom (3.1%) visibility equal to Microsoft brands like Office 365 and SharePoint (both 3.1%), showing no clear preference. Its perception suggests Teams benefits from integration within Microsoft’s productivity tools, while Zoom remains a competitive standalone option.
Deepseek exhibits a neutral-to-positive tone toward Microsoft’s ecosystem with high visibility for Office 365 (4.6%), SharePoint (4.6%), and Outlook (4.6%), matching Zoom’s 4.6%. It perceives Teams as advantageous for companies due to seamless integration with these widely adopted tools over Zoom’s isolated functionality.
ChatGPT shows a neutral sentiment with Zoom at 3.1% visibility, alongside Microsoft brands like Office 365 (3.1%) and SharePoint (3.1%), without clear favoritism. Its perception hints at Teams gaining an edge through Microsoft’s collaborative ecosystem, while Zoom stands as a comparable but less integrated solution.
Zoom appears to edge out Microsoft Teams as the preferred choice for 2025 across the models, primarily due to its higher visibility and perceived standalone strength in video conferencing compared to Teams’ broader but less focused ecosystem integration.
Perplexity shows a slight favor toward Zoom with a 4.6% visibility share compared to Microsoft-related brands like Office 365 (3.1%) and SharePoint (3.1%), suggesting a perception of Zoom as a strong standalone tool for video conferencing. Its tone is neutral, focusing on equal representation but highlighting Zoom’s prominence in direct mentions.
Grok presents a balanced view with Zoom and Microsoft-associated brands like Windows, SharePoint, and OneDrive each at 3.1% visibility, indicating no clear preference for either Zoom or Teams. The tone is neutral, emphasizing ecosystem diversity over specific tool superiority.
Deepseek leans toward Zoom with a 4.6% visibility share against Microsoft brands like Windows (4.6%) and Office 365 (3.1%), reflecting a perception of Zoom’s user-friendly focus on conferencing over Microsoft’s broader suite. The tone is positive toward both but slightly more favorable to Zoom’s niche strength.
Gemini equally favors Zoom and Microsoft ecosystems, with Zoom and Windows both at 4.6% visibility, while SharePoint also scores high at 4.6%, suggesting Teams benefits from deep integration but Zoom stands out for accessibility. The tone is positive, valuing both for different user needs.
ChatGPT shows no strong preference, with Zoom and Microsoft brands like Windows, SharePoint, and OneDrive each at 3.1% visibility, indicating a balanced view of their capabilities for collaboration in 2025. The tone is neutral, focusing on coexistence within diverse workflows.
Zoom appears to be slightly favored over Teams for teaching purposes due to its consistent visibility and perceived ease of use across multiple models. While Teams is tied to broader Microsoft ecosystems, it lacks standout recognition in this specific context.
Perplexity shows a balanced visibility share for Zoom at 4.6%, alongside Microsoft-related products like Office 365 and OneDrive, but no direct mention of Teams suggests a slight preference for Zoom in teaching contexts. The tone is neutral, focusing on visibility without explicit favoring.
ChatGPT assigns Zoom a visibility share of 3.1%, equal to several other tools including Microsoft products like OneDrive, but Teams is absent, indicating a subtle lean toward Zoom for teaching relevance. The tone remains neutral, with no strong sentiment expressed.
Deepseek gives Zoom a high visibility share of 4.6%, matching other tools like Canvas, while Teams is not mentioned, suggesting Zoom's stronger association with teaching environments. The tone is neutral, driven by data distribution rather than explicit opinion.
Grok allocates Zoom a visibility share of 3.1%, equal to Microsoft products like Office 365 and OneDrive, but without Teams referenced, Zoom appears more relevant for teaching scenarios. The tone is neutral, reflecting an unbiased presentation of data.
Gemini ranks Zoom at a high visibility share of 4.6%, alongside tools like Canvas, while Teams is not highlighted despite mentions of other Microsoft tools like Outlook, indicating Zoom's stronger connection to teaching. The tone is neutral, focusing on comparative visibility without strong bias.
Zoom appears to have a slight edge over Teams in visibility across the models, primarily due to its consistent recognition as a standalone video conferencing solution compared to Teams’ deeper integration within the Microsoft ecosystem.
Zoom is recognized with a visibility share of 4.6%, equal to several Microsoft-associated brands like Windows and OneDrive, indicating no clear favoritism between Zoom and Teams (implied within the Microsoft ecosystem). The sentiment tone is neutral, focusing on visibility without explicit preference.
Zoom holds a visibility share of 3.1%, on par with several Microsoft-related brands like Windows and OneDrive, suggesting no distinct bias toward Zoom or Teams (implied via Microsoft ecosystem mentions). The sentiment tone remains neutral, reflecting balanced visibility data.
Zoom is noted with a visibility share of 3.1%, matching several Microsoft brands like Windows and OneDrive, indicating no strong preference over Teams (implied through Microsoft associations). The sentiment tone is neutral, focusing purely on visibility metrics.
Zoom achieves a visibility share of 4.6%, equal to key Microsoft brands like Windows and Outlook, pointing to comparable recognition without favoring Zoom or Teams explicitly. The sentiment tone is neutral, with an emphasis on ecosystem visibility.
Zoom stands out with a visibility share of 4.6%, alongside Slack and Windows, suggesting a slight lean toward Zoom as a prominent standalone tool compared to Teams’ implied embedding in Microsoft’s ecosystem (via Office 365 and Outlook mentions). The sentiment tone is mildly positive toward Zoom’s independent recognition.
Zoom appears to be perceived as easier to use than Teams across most models due to its consistent visibility and association with simplicity in user experience.
ChatGPT shows equal visibility for Zoom alongside Windows and OneDrive at 3.1%, with no mention of Teams, suggesting a slight lean toward Zoom as easier due to its presence in relevant discussions. The sentiment tone is neutral, focusing on visibility without strong bias.
Grok assigns Zoom a visibility share of 3.1%, matching Windows and Office 365, while Teams is absent, implying Zoom might be seen as more accessible or easier in broader contexts. The sentiment tone is neutral, with an emphasis on ecosystem mentions over direct ease-of-use commentary.
Gemini gives Zoom a higher visibility share of 4.6% alongside Windows, with no mention of Teams, indicating a preference for Zoom as potentially easier to use due to its prominence. The sentiment tone is neutral to positive, reflecting Zoom’s strong association in the model’s responses.
DeepSeek equally prioritizes Zoom at 4.6% visibility with Windows, omitting Teams, which suggests Zoom is perceived as more user-friendly or easier to adopt in discussed contexts. The sentiment tone is neutral, focusing on visibility without overt criticism or praise.
Perplexity highlights Zoom at 4.6% visibility alongside Windows, with no reference to Teams, pointing to Zoom as likely easier in terms of user recognition and accessibility. The sentiment tone is neutral, driven by data representation rather than explicit judgment.
Which brand leads in AI visibility and mentions.
Brands most often recommended by AI models
Top Choice
Models Agree
Overall ranking based on AI brand mentions
Rank #1
Total Analyzed Answers
Recent shifts in AI model responses
Rising Star
Growth Rate
