Midjourney vs DALL-E
Midjourney vs DALL-E: Which AI art generator is better? Compare features, art quality, pricing, and the artist controversy.
Key Findings
Which brand leads in AI visibility and mentions.
Midjourney dominates over DALL-E in AI visibility unanimously
AI Recommendation
Brands most often recommended by AI models
Midjourney
Top Choice
6/6
Models Agree
Popularity Ranking
Overall ranking based on AI brand mentions
Midjourney
Rank #1
2/2
Total Analyzed Answers
Trending Mentions
Recent shifts in AI model responses
Midjourney
Rising Star
100%
Growth Rate
Brand Visibility
Analysis of brand presence in AI-generated responses.
AI Visibility Share Rankings
Brands ranked by share of AI mentions in answers
AI Visibility Share Over Time
Visibility share trends over time across compared brands
Topics Compared
Key insights from AI Apps comparisons across major topics
"Which AI art generator has better pricing?"
Midjourney and Stable Diffusion emerge as the leading AI art generators in terms of visibility and inferred pricing appeal across models, driven by consistent recognition and perceived value.
ChatGPT favors Midjourney and Stable Diffusion with high visibility shares of 8.5% and 8% respectively, suggesting a perception of competitive pricing due to their prominence. Its tone is positive, emphasizing market presence as a proxy for cost-effectiveness.
Gemini shows a balanced view with Midjourney, Leonardo, and ChatGPT each at 2.7%, but no explicit pricing data is inferred; visibility suggests user familiarity which could correlate to accessible pricing. Its tone is neutral, focusing on equal distribution without strong sentiment.
Deepseek leans toward Midjourney and ChatGPT at 2.9% visibility each, with Stable Diffusion close at 2.7%, implying a preference for established tools likely tied to reasonable pricing structures. Its tone is positive, reflecting confidence in popular adoption as a pricing indicator.
Grok highlights Midjourney, Stable Diffusion, and ChatGPT equally at 2.7% visibility, suggesting these are seen as cost-effective due to widespread recognition. Its tone is neutral to positive, leaning on adoption patterns as a subtle pricing cue.
Perplexity favors Canva at 2.9% visibility, with no strong focus on traditional AI art generators like Midjourney, potentially indicating a perception of better pricing in broader design tools. Its tone is neutral, lacking direct pricing sentiment but focusing on niche accessibility.
Google shows no clear preference for AI art generators, with low and evenly distributed visibility (0.3% across brands like Canva and DreamStudio), offering little insight into pricing perception. Its tone is skeptical, as the data lacks depth or focus on relevant tools.
"Which AI art tool is better for professional work?"
Midjourney emerges as the leading AI art tool for professional work across most models due to its consistently high visibility share and implied focus on quality output and user adoption.
Perplexity favors Midjourney with a visibility share of 2.9%, the highest among AI art tools, suggesting a perception of strong relevance or quality for professional use. Its tone is neutral, focusing on visibility without explicit critique or endorsement.
ChatGPT strongly favors Midjourney with a standout visibility share of 10.1%, far exceeding competitors like Adobe (9.8%) and Stable Diffusion (8.8%), indicating a preference for its capabilities or popularity in professional contexts. The tone is positive, reflected in the significant emphasis on Midjourney’s presence.
Grok shows a balanced view, giving equal visibility (3.5%) to Midjourney, Adobe, and Stable Diffusion, suggesting no single tool dominates for professional work in its perception. Its tone is neutral, presenting a leveled assessment without clear bias.
Gemini equally prioritizes Midjourney, Adobe, and Stable Diffusion (each at 3.2%), indicating a perception of comparable suitability for professional art creation. The tone remains neutral, with no explicit preference or critical judgment expressed.
Deepseek leans slightly toward Midjourney, Adobe, and Stable Diffusion (each at 2.9%), suggesting a balanced recognition of their professional utility over other tools like RunwayML (2.7%). Its tone is neutral, focusing on visibility without strong sentiment.
"Which AI is better for photorealistic images?"
Midjourney and Stable Diffusion are the leading tools for photorealistic images across most AI models, with their high visibility shares reflecting strong community trust and proven capabilities in this domain.
ChatGPT shows a clear preference for Midjourney and Stable Diffusion, both with an 8.5% visibility share, indicating strong recognition for their capabilities in photorealistic image generation. Its sentiment tone is positive, emphasizing their widespread adoption and user trust in this area.
Deepseek favors Midjourney, Adobe, and Stable Diffusion equally at a 2.9% visibility share, suggesting they are reliable choices for photorealistic imaging. Its tone is neutral, presenting a balanced view without strong bias toward any single tool.
Grok leans toward Midjourney and Stable Diffusion, each with a 2.1% visibility share, as leading options for photorealistic images due to their consistent performance. Its sentiment tone is positive, reflecting confidence in their technical strengths.
Perplexity highlights Midjourney and Stable Diffusion at a 1.3% visibility share, recognizing them as notable contenders for photorealistic image creation. Its tone is neutral, focusing on their presence without strong endorsement.
Gemini equally favors Midjourney and Stable Diffusion, both at a 2.4% visibility share, for their effectiveness in generating photorealistic images. Its tone is positive, emphasizing their accessibility and community support.
Google does not show a strong preference for any single brand relevant to photorealistic images, with a fragmented visibility share across niche tools like NightCafe and Imagine.art at 0.3% each. Its tone is neutral, lacking focus on leading players in this space.
"Which AI makes more beautiful art: Midjourney or DALL-E?"
Midjourney emerges as the leading AI for creating beautiful art across the analyzed models due to its consistently higher visibility share and implied community engagement.
Gemini shows a slight favor towards Midjourney with a visibility share of 3.2%, though it lacks explicit reasoning on art quality. Its sentiment tone is neutral, focusing on visibility rather than qualitative assessment of art beauty.
ChatGPT strongly favors Midjourney with a visibility share of 9.6%, significantly higher than other platforms, suggesting a preference or recognition for its art creation capabilities. The tone is positive, likely driven by user engagement and community discussions around Midjourney's artistic outputs.
Grok presents a balanced view with Midjourney at a visibility share of 2.9%, showing no strong bias but acknowledging its presence in art-related conversations. The sentiment tone is neutral, with no clear qualitative judgment on the beauty of the art produced.
Perplexity slightly favors Midjourney with a visibility share of 2.9%, indicating recognition in the context of art generation. Its sentiment tone is neutral, lacking deeper insights into the aesthetic quality of Midjourney's outputs.
Deepseek also leans towards Midjourney with a visibility share of 2.9%, aligning it with communitymentions relevant to art creation. The tone remains neutral, focusing on visibility without explicit commentary on the beauty of the generated art.
"Can AI art generators replace human artists?"
AI art generators like Midjourney are seen as powerful tools with significant potential to complement human artists, but they are not poised to fully replace them due to concerns about creativity and emotional depth. Models collectively highlight a balance between innovation and the irreplaceable human element in art.
Gemini shows a slight favoring of Midjourney and ChatGPT (both at 2.1% visibility share) over traditional tools like Adobe (1.6%) and Procreate (0.5%), reflecting a positive sentiment toward AI art generators as innovative aids, though not direct replacements for human creativity. Its tone is neutral, focusing on coexistence rather than competition.
ChatGPT heavily favors Midjourney and itself (both at 6.4% visibility share), indicating a strong positive sentiment for AI art tools as accessible and transformative, though mentions of legal entities like DMCA (0.3%) suggest a skeptical undertone regarding copyright issues in replacing human artists. The focus remains on AI’s potential to democratize art creation.
Perplexity equally highlights Midjourney and ChatGPT (both at 1.6% visibility share), with a neutral tone that acknowledges AI tools as significant players in the art space without explicitly favoring replacement of human artists. Its limited brand focus suggests a balanced view of AI as a supplementary force.
Deepseek leans toward Midjourney and ChatGPT (both at 2.4% visibility share), showing a positive sentiment for AI tools as innovative, though its minimal mention of Adobe and Stable Diffusion (0.3% each) indicates a neutral stance on full replacement of human artists. It frames AI as a growing but not dominant force in art.
Grok favors Midjourney and ChatGPT (both at 2.9% visibility share) alongside Stable Diffusion (2.7%), reflecting a positive sentiment toward AI art generators, but its inclusion of human artists like Refik Anadol (1.1%) and Holly Herndon (0.5%) suggests skepticism about total replacement. Its tone emphasizes collaboration between AI and human creativity.
FAQs
Key insights into your brand's market position, AI coverage, and topic leadership.
Which is better, Midjourney or DALL-E?
Midjourney creates more artistic, gallery-quality images with a distinctive painterly style. DALL-E 3 is better at following precise prompts and generating exactly what you ask for. Midjourney requires Discord (clunky), DALL-E is built into ChatGPT (convenient). Price: Midjourney starts at $10/month, DALL-E comes with ChatGPT Plus at $20/month. Professional artists prefer Midjourney for aesthetics, businesses prefer DALL-E for precision and ease of use.
Is Midjourney or DALL-E better for professional artists?
Professional artists overwhelmingly prefer Midjourney for serious work. Midjourney v6 produces incredible detail, lighting, and composition that rivals human work. Many concept artists use it for client work and mood boards. DALL-E is easier but produces more 'AI-looking' results. The catch: many artists hate both tools because they see them as threats to their careers. If you're trying to stay competitive professionally, Midjourney's quality makes it hard to ignore.
Why are artists angry about Midjourney and DALL-E?
Both were trained on millions of copyrighted artworks without permission or compensation. Artists can type their own names into these tools and get results mimicking their style. Several major lawsuits are ongoing for copyright infringement. The emotional impact: junior artists can't get hired because clients generate similar work for pennies. Art school graduates find their careers dead on arrival. Communities like ArtStation saw massive protests. Artists feel their life's work was stolen to train machines that replace them.
Can Midjourney or DALL-E replace human artists?
For certain work, yes they already have. What AI replaced: stock photos, basic illustrations, social media graphics, concept exploration, generic commercial art. Many businesses use AI instead of hiring freelancers. What AI can't replace: specific client revisions, emotional storytelling requiring human understanding, truly original creative vision, art direction requiring taste, and accountability. The controversial truth: AI democratized mediocre art while threatening professionals. You either compete on price with AI (losing) or you're exceptional enough that AI can't match you (fewer positions).
Which AI art generator should I use in 2025?
Choose Midjourney if: you want beautiful artistic images, you're doing creative work, you prioritize aesthetics, you don't mind Discord. Best for digital artists and concept artists. Choose DALL-E if: you want precise control, you use ChatGPT already, you need commercial-safe images, you want convenience. Best for marketers and business users. Consider Stable Diffusion if you're technical and want free open source. Most people use multiple tools - Midjourney for beautiful art, DALL-E for specific tasks.
