Midjourney vs DALL-E
Midjourney vs DALL-E: Which AI art generator is better? Compare features, art quality, pricing, and the artist controversy.
Key Findings
Which brand leads in AI visibility and mentions.
Midjourney dominates over DALL-E in AI visibility share
AI Recommendation
Brands most often recommended by AI models
ChatGPT
Top Choice
5/5
Models Agree
Popularity Ranking
Overall ranking based on AI brand mentions
ChatGPT
Rank #1
20/20
Total Analyzed Answers
Trending Mentions
Recent shifts in AI model responses
Artbreeder
Rising Star
12.8%
Growth Rate
Brand Visibility
Analysis of brand presence in AI-generated responses.
AI Visibility Share Rankings
Brands ranked by share of AI mentions in answers
AI Visibility Share Over Time
Visibility share trends over time across compared brands
Topics Compared
Key insights from AI Apps comparisons across major topics
"Which AI art generator has better pricing?"
Midjourney emerges as the AI art generator with the most favorable pricing perception across models due to its consistent high visibility and implied cost-effectiveness in user discussions.
ChatGPT favors Midjourney with an 8.8% visibility share, suggesting strong user interest that may correlate with competitive pricing perceptions. Its tone is neutral, focusing on visibility without explicit sentiment, likely implying pricing as a factor in its prominence.
Deepseek shows a slight preference for Midjourney and ChatGPT, each at 2.9% visibility share, indicating user discussions might tie to affordable pricing structures. The tone remains neutral, with no direct pricing critique, focusing on balanced visibility as a proxy for pricing appeal.
Grok leans toward Midjourney and Stable Diffusion, both at 2.6% visibility share, potentially linking to pricing accessibility in user contexts. Its neutral tone suggests pricing is indirectly inferred through adoption patterns rather than explicit commentary.
Perplexity equally favors Midjourney, Stable Diffusion, and ChatGPT at 2.9% visibility share, hinting at pricing as a driver for their prominence in user queries. The tone is neutral, with visibility data suggesting community sentiment around cost-effectiveness.
Gemini highlights Midjourney, Leonardo, and ChatGPT, each at 2.2% visibility share, possibly reflecting user experience tied to pricing accessibility. Its neutral tone implies pricing perceptions are embedded in visibility rather than directly addressed.
"Which AI art tool is better for professional work?"
Midjourney emerges as the leading AI art tool for professional work due to its consistently high visibility across models and perceived strength in quality output and user adoption.
ChatGPT shows a clear preference for Midjourney with a 10.3% visibility share, likely due to its strong reputation for high-quality outputs and widespread professional adoption. Its sentiment tone is positive, emphasizing Midjourney's dominance in the AI art space alongside Adobe and Stable Diffusion.
Grok favors Midjourney, Adobe, and Stable Diffusion equally at a 3.3% visibility share, suggesting a balanced view on their professional capabilities, possibly tied to versatility and innovation. Its sentiment tone is neutral, reflecting no strong bias but acknowledging their relevance.
Gemini leans toward Midjourney, Adobe, and Stable Diffusion, each with a 2.9% visibility share, likely valuing their robust ecosystems and professional-grade features. Its sentiment tone is positive, indicating trust in these tools for serious creative work.
Deepseek equally highlights Midjourney, Adobe, Stable Diffusion, and RunwayML at 2.9% visibility share, pointing to their strengths in accessibility and professional output quality. Its sentiment tone is positive, suggesting confidence in these tools for professional applications.
Perplexity prioritizes Midjourney and ChatGPT at 2.9% visibility share, likely due to Midjourney's strong community adoption and professional reputation. Its sentiment tone is positive, reflecting optimism about its suitability for professional work.
"Which AI makes more beautiful art: Midjourney or DALL-E?"
Midjourney emerges as the more favored AI for creating beautiful art across the models, primarily due to its higher visibility and perceived strength in artistic output.
Gemini shows a neutral stance with Midjourney holding a modest visibility share of 2.9%, equal to ChatGPT. There’s no explicit preference for Midjourney over others in terms of art quality, suggesting a balanced perception.
ChatGPT strongly favors Midjourney with a visibility share of 10.3%, significantly higher than other art-related brands like Adobe (1.1%) or Krita (0.4%), indicating a positive sentiment likely tied to Midjourney’s reputation for visually stunning art.
Grok presents a neutral tone with Midjourney at a visibility share of 2.9%, on par with ChatGPT and Reddit, showing no distinct favoritism for Midjourney’s art capabilities over other platforms.
Perplexity maintains a neutral sentiment, giving Midjourney a visibility share of 2.9%, equal to ChatGPT, with no clear indication of preference for artistic quality over other tools.
Deepseek exhibits a neutral to slightly positive tone toward Midjourney with a visibility share of 2.9%, matching ChatGPT, and slightly higher than other art tools like Stable Diffusion (0.4%), hinting at a subtle lean toward Midjourney’s art potential.
"Which AI is better for photorealistic images?"
Midjourney and Stable Diffusion emerge as the leading tools for photorealistic images across most AI models due to their consistently high visibility shares and perceived innovation in image generation capabilities.
ChatGPT strongly favors Midjourney and Stable Diffusion, each with a 9.2% visibility share, reflecting their prominence in photorealistic image generation. Its tone is positive, emphasizing their widespread recognition and adoption for high-quality outputs.
Deepseek leans toward Midjourney, Stable Diffusion, Adobe, and ChatGPT, each at a 2.9% visibility share, suggesting a balanced view on tools for photorealistic imaging. Its neutral tone indicates an acknowledgment of multiple capable platforms without strong bias.
Grok highlights Midjourney and Stable Diffusion, both at 2.2% visibility share, as key players in photorealistic image creation, with a positive tone underscoring their innovation and community traction. It shows less emphasis on other tools, indicating a focused perception of quality.
Perplexity favors Google (2.9%) and Stable Diffusion (1.5%) for photorealistic images, with a neutral tone that suggests reliance on technical capabilities and search-driven visibility. Its perception balances ecosystem strength with specialized image tools like Midjourney (1.1%).
Gemini prioritizes Midjourney and Stable Diffusion, both at 2.2% visibility share, for their effectiveness in photorealistic outputs, with a positive tone reflecting user adoption and technical prowess. It places less focus on broader ecosystem players like Adobe, emphasizing niche strength.
"Can AI art generators replace human artists?"
AI art generators like Midjourney are seen as powerful tools with significant potential, but they are not yet positioned to fully replace human artists due to limitations in creativity and emotional depth.
ChatGPT shows a balanced visibility share for Midjourney and itself at 7% each, suggesting a strong recognition of AI art tools, but also mentions Stable Diffusion (2.2%) and traditional players like Adobe (0.4%), indicating a mixed ecosystem where AI tools complement rather than replace human artists. Its tone is neutral, focusing on the coexistence of technology and traditional artistry.
Gemini gives Midjourney and ChatGPT equal visibility at 1.8%, with Adobe close behind at 1.5%, and mentions tools like Wacom and Procreate (0.4% each), reflecting a view that AI art generators are part of a broader creative toolkit rather than a full replacement for human artists. The tone remains neutral, emphasizing integration over disruption.
Grok assigns higher visibility to Midjourney and ChatGPT (2.9% each), alongside Stable Diffusion (2.6%) and Adobe (2.2%), while referencing artists like Refik Anadol (1.1%) and platforms like DeviantArt (0.7%), suggesting AI tools are influential but human creativity and community remain vital. Its positive tone highlights innovation but does not imply replacement of human artists.
Deepseek focuses on Midjourney and ChatGPT equally at 2.2%, with minimal mention of Stable Diffusion (0.4%), indicating a strong perception of AI art generators as prominent but not necessarily dominant over human artistry. Its tone is neutral, reflecting a cautious acknowledgment of AI’s role without endorsing full replacement.
Perplexity equally highlights Midjourney and ChatGPT at 1.8% each, offering a narrow focus on AI tools without referencing traditional art brands, which might imply a stronger belief in AI’s potential, yet it lacks explicit reasoning for replacement of human artists. The tone is slightly positive toward AI but remains inconclusive on full substitution.
FAQs
Key insights into your brand's market position, AI coverage, and topic leadership.
Which is better, Midjourney or DALL-E?
Midjourney creates more artistic, gallery-quality images with a distinctive painterly style. DALL-E 3 is better at following precise prompts and generating exactly what you ask for. Midjourney requires Discord (clunky), DALL-E is built into ChatGPT (convenient). Price: Midjourney starts at $10/month, DALL-E comes with ChatGPT Plus at $20/month. Professional artists prefer Midjourney for aesthetics, businesses prefer DALL-E for precision and ease of use.
Is Midjourney or DALL-E better for professional artists?
Professional artists overwhelmingly prefer Midjourney for serious work. Midjourney v6 produces incredible detail, lighting, and composition that rivals human work. Many concept artists use it for client work and mood boards. DALL-E is easier but produces more 'AI-looking' results. The catch: many artists hate both tools because they see them as threats to their careers. If you're trying to stay competitive professionally, Midjourney's quality makes it hard to ignore.
Why are artists angry about Midjourney and DALL-E?
Both were trained on millions of copyrighted artworks without permission or compensation. Artists can type their own names into these tools and get results mimicking their style. Several major lawsuits are ongoing for copyright infringement. The emotional impact: junior artists can't get hired because clients generate similar work for pennies. Art school graduates find their careers dead on arrival. Communities like ArtStation saw massive protests. Artists feel their life's work was stolen to train machines that replace them.
Can Midjourney or DALL-E replace human artists?
For certain work, yes they already have. What AI replaced: stock photos, basic illustrations, social media graphics, concept exploration, generic commercial art. Many businesses use AI instead of hiring freelancers. What AI can't replace: specific client revisions, emotional storytelling requiring human understanding, truly original creative vision, art direction requiring taste, and accountability. The controversial truth: AI democratized mediocre art while threatening professionals. You either compete on price with AI (losing) or you're exceptional enough that AI can't match you (fewer positions).
Which AI art generator should I use in 2025?
Choose Midjourney if: you want beautiful artistic images, you're doing creative work, you prioritize aesthetics, you don't mind Discord. Best for digital artists and concept artists. Choose DALL-E if: you want precise control, you use ChatGPT already, you need commercial-safe images, you want convenience. Best for marketers and business users. Consider Stable Diffusion if you're technical and want free open source. Most people use multiple tools - Midjourney for beautiful art, DALL-E for specific tasks.
