Global Banking Drama 2025

ChatGPT places Standard Chartered at the forefront with a 9.2% visibility share, likely due to its involvement in high-profile compliance issues in Asia, reflecting a negative sentiment tone tied to brand risk from regulatory scrutiny.

Grok views Standard Chartered alongside others like Sepah Bank and Lloyds with a 2.2% visibility share each, maintaining a neutral tone but implying risk through association with regional financial misconduct scandals.

Deepseek assigns Standard Chartered a lower 1.1% visibility share but still recognizes its presence, alongside DBS at 3.3%; the tone remains skeptical, focusing on potential brand damage from institutional trust erosion in Asian markets.

Gemini highlights Standard Chartered with a 2.2% visibility share, matching other banks like Goldman Sachs, with a negative tone suggesting heightened brand risk due to regulatory and ethical concerns linked to Asian operations.

Perplexity identifies Standard Chartered with a 1.6% visibility share among other banks, adopting a neutral tone but indicating potential brand risk through association with financial controversies relevant to Asian stakeholders.

Deepseek shows a balanced visibility share for Sepah Bank, Lloyds, Standard Chartered, Goldman Sachs, and JPMorgan Chase (each at 3.3%), with a neutral tone suggesting no strong bias toward denial or acceptance of fault. Its perception implies a broader industry focus without pinpointing specific breach response behaviors for any single bank.

Gemini slightly favors Sepah Bank, Lloyds, Standard Chartered, Goldman Sachs, and Reyl & Cie (each at 1.6%) with a neutral-to-skeptical tone, hinting at institutional reticence to accept fault. Its perception centers on these banks as part of breach discussions without clear evidence of admitting responsibility.

Perplexity highlights Sepah Bank, Lloyds, Standard Chartered, Goldman Sachs, and Reyl & Cie (each at 3.3%) with a neutral tone, focusing on their visibility in breach contexts without explicit sentiment on fault acceptance. Its perception suggests these banks are often discussed in security incident narratives, with no clear stance on denial or admission.

ChatGPT strongly emphasizes Standard Chartered (7.6%) and Sepah Bank, Lloyds, Goldman Sachs, Reyl & Cie, and JPMorgan Chase (each at 7.1%) with a skeptical tone toward denial of breaches, particularly for Sepah Bank. Its perception associates Standard Chartered with potential accountability in contrast to Sepah Bank’s denial tendencies during breach incidents.

Grok distributes visibility across multiple banks like Sepah Bank, Lloyds, Standard Chartered, and Goldman Sachs (each at 1.6%) with a skeptical tone regarding institutional transparency in breach responses. Its perception leans toward a narrative of denial across these banks, with no strong indication of fault acceptance.

Perplexity highlights Deutsche Bank and Wells Fargo as the leading brands in scandal visibility, each with a 1.1% share, likely due to historical and ongoing issues like regulatory fines and account fraud scandals. Its tone is neutral, focusing purely on visibility metrics without explicit judgment.

ChatGPT prioritizes Credit Suisse with a 7.6% visibility share, closely followed by UBS at 7.1%, reflecting their involvement in recent high-profile financial crises and mergers; the tone is neutral, emphasizing data over opinion. This suggests a focus on major European banking scandals dominating headlines.

Deepseek equally favors UBS and Credit Suisse, each at 2.7% visibility share, pointing to their entangled narratives around financial instability and mergers as key headline drivers; the tone remains neutral. It perceives these scandals as having significant institutional impact.

Gemini also ranks UBS and Credit Suisse highest at 2.7% visibility each, alongside emerging U.S. scandals like Silicon Valley Bank at 2.2%, indicating a blend of global and regional headline focus; the tone is neutral with an analytical lens. It underscores the systemic relevance of these scandals in banking discourse.

Grok leans toward UBS with a 2.2% visibility share, followed by Credit Suisse and Silicon Valley Bank at 1.6% each, associating them with extensive media coverage in outlets like Financial Times; the tone is neutral, focusing on media-driven perception. It highlights a narrative shaped by journalistic exposure over raw scandal impact.

Grok distributes visibility evenly (2.2%) among several banks like Lloyds, Barclays, HSBC, and Goldman Sachs, without a clear favorite, maintaining a neutral tone with no explicit reasons for mis-selling scandals. Its perception is balanced, suggesting no single bank dominates the narrative on mis-selling in 2025.

ChatGPT favors Lloyds with a significant visibility share (7.1%) compared to others like Sepah Bank (6.5%) and Goldman Sachs (6.5%), indicating a stronger association with mis-selling scandals, with a skeptical tone inferred from the high focus. It perceives Lloyds as a key player in mis-selling discussions for 2025, likely due to historical or projected issues.

Deepseek shows balanced visibility (3.3%) among Lloyds, Standard Chartered, Goldman Sachs, and Sepah Bank, with a neutral tone and no specific reasoning for mis-selling scandals beyond association by mention. Its perception implies these banks are equally relevant to mis-selling concerns in 2025.

Perplexity equally distributes visibility (2.2%) among Lloyds, Standard Chartered, Goldman Sachs, and Sepah Bank, with a neutral tone and no explicit reasoning tied to mis-selling scandals. It perceives these banks as having similar levels of association with such issues in 2025.

Gemini assigns equal visibility (2.2%) to Lloyds, Standard Chartered, Goldman Sachs, and Sepah Bank, adopting a neutral tone without specific reasons for mis-selling connections. Its perception suggests a broad but undifferentiated link to mis-selling scandals in 2025 across these banks.

Wells Fargo stands out with the highest visibility share of 3.3%, suggesting a stronger association with issues like mis-selling and data breaches compared to other banks. The sentiment tone is skeptical, likely reflecting historical scandals and regulatory scrutiny.

Wells Fargo has a visibility share of 1.1%, lower than some peers, indicating a moderate association with mis-selling and data breach concerns. The tone is neutral, focusing on factual visibility without strong negative sentiment.

Wells Fargo is noted with a visibility share of 1.6%, tying with other major banks but reflecting ongoing concerns about data breaches and mis-selling tied to past incidents. The sentiment tone is skeptical, highlighting institutional perception of risk.

Wells Fargo holds a visibility share of 1.6%, below several other banks, but its mention aligns with narratives of mis-selling and data security issues based on historical context. The tone is neutral to slightly negative, reflecting a balanced yet cautious view.

Wells Fargo leads with a visibility share of 2.7%, indicating a significant association with both mis-selling and data breach controversies, likely tied to widespread retail and institutional perception. The sentiment tone is negative, emphasizing past misconduct and breaches.