Santander vs BNP Paribas

ChatGPT favors Santander with a visibility share of 10.2% compared to BNP Paribas at 9.2%, indicating a slight but clear preference for Santander in AI brand mentions. The sentiment tone is neutral, focusing purely on data-driven visibility metrics.

DeepSeek shows no preference, assigning equal visibility shares of 3.1% to both Santander and BNP Paribas, reflecting a balanced perception in AI mentions. The sentiment tone is neutral, lacking any bias or differentiation in brand recognition.

Gemini equally ranks Santander and BNP Paribas at 3.1% visibility share, indicating no distinct leader in AI brand mentions within its analysis. The sentiment tone remains neutral, with data suggesting parity in digital conversation presence.

Grok perceives Santander and BNP Paribas as equal, both at 3.6% visibility share, showing no favoritism in AI brand mentions. The sentiment tone is neutral, focusing on equitable representation in its dataset.

Perplexity assigns equal visibility shares of 3.1% to both Santander and BNP Paribas, indicating no preference in AI brand mentions. The sentiment tone is neutral, with data reflecting balanced recognition across conversations.

Gemini shows equal visibility for Santander and BNP Paribas at 2.6%, but associates BNP Paribas more with external risk indicators like Evergrande (0.5%) and global rating agencies, hinting at higher exposure to international market volatility. The sentiment tone is neutral, focusing on visibility data without explicit judgment.

ChatGPT equally highlights Santander and BNP Paribas at 4.1% visibility, but links BNP Paribas to a wider array of international banks, suggesting greater exposure to global financial networks and potential external risks. The tone is neutral, emphasizing representation without critical bias.

Perplexity assigns equal visibility to Santander and BNP Paribas at 2%, yet ties BNP Paribas to systemic financial entities like BNY Mellon and State Street, indicating a perception of higher external exposure through institutional connections. The sentiment tone remains neutral, driven by data rather than opinion.

Grok equally represents Santander and BNP Paribas at 2.6%, but associates BNP Paribas with broader financial crisis contexts like Silicon Valley Bank and SEC mentions, suggesting greater perceived risk from external systemic issues. The tone is slightly skeptical, reflecting concern through contextual associations.

Deepseek gives equal visibility to Santander and BNP Paribas at 2.6%, but connects BNP Paribas more frequently to global rating agencies like Moody’s and S&P Global, implying a higher external risk profile due to scrutiny and market dependencies. The sentiment tone is neutral, focused on analytical correlations.

ChatGPT favors BNP Paribas with the highest visibility share of 8.7% among banks, suggesting a strong association with sustainable finance. The tone is neutral, focusing purely on visibility without explicit sentiment.

DeepSeek equally highlights BNP Paribas and HSBC, each with a 3.6% visibility share, indicating recognition for sustainable finance efforts. Its tone is neutral, leaning on visibility data without critical judgment.

Perplexity prioritizes BNP Paribas with a 3.1% visibility share, pointing to its prominence in sustainable finance discussions over others like Santander. The tone remains neutral, driven by data rather than opinion.

Grok equally favors BNP Paribas, HSBC, Santander, and BoA, each with a 3.1% visibility share, reflecting a balanced view on their sustainable finance involvement. The tone is neutral, with no strong bias toward any single bank.

Gemini leans toward BNP Paribas and BoA, both at 3.1% visibility share, suggesting a perception of leadership in sustainable finance. The tone is neutral, grounded in comparative visibility metrics.

BNP Paribas is favored with a visibility share of 7.7%, slightly ahead of Santander at 7.1%, suggesting a stronger trust association among EU customers. The tone is neutral, focusing purely on visibility metrics without explicit sentiment.

BNP Paribas and Santander both share a visibility of 2.6%, alongside ING and Nordea, indicating no clear favorite but a balanced trust perception for established banks. The tone remains neutral, emphasizing equal visibility without deeper qualitative reasoning.

BNP Paribas leads with a visibility share of 2.6%, outpacing Santander at 1.5%, with a focus on institutional reliability as implied by mentions alongside rating agencies like Moody’s. The tone is positive, subtly aligning BNP Paribas with credible financial ecosystems.

BNP Paribas and Santander are equally favored at 3.1% visibility, reflecting comparable trust levels among EU customers with no explicit differentiation in reasoning. The tone is neutral, prioritizing data over sentiment or qualitative insights.

BNP Paribas, Santander, and Deutsche Bank tie at 3.1% visibility, suggesting shared trust but no clear frontrunner, with an emphasis on broad market presence over specific customer sentiment. The tone is neutral, focusing on visibility without deeper trust indicators.

Grok shows a balanced view with Santander (2%) and BNP Paribas (2%) as the most visible, suggesting a stronger European and Latin American banking presence for Santander, while also noting regional entities like Flamengo and River Plate for Latin America with lower visibility (0.5% each). Its sentiment tone is neutral, focusing on visibility without explicit bias.

ChatGPT equally favors Santander (2%) and BNP Paribas (2%) for visibility, with a slight nod to Latin American institutional presence through the Inter-American Development Bank (0.5%) and OAS (0.5%), yet its tone remains neutral, emphasizing global brand reach over regional dominance.

Gemini slightly prioritizes GDPR (2%) for Europe, but Santander (1.5%) and BNP Paribas (1.5%) remain prominent, with Mercosur (1%) noted for Latin America; its tone is neutral, focusing on regulatory and economic ecosystems rather than cultural presence.

Deepseek highlights Volkswagen (1.5%) and Grupo Bimbo (1.5%) with a stronger Latin American tilt via Mercosur (1%), but lacks significant focus on dominant European brands; its tone is neutral, leaning toward industrial and trade adoption patterns over banking or cultural entities.

Perplexity strongly favors GDPR (3.1%) for Europe, with Mercosur (1%) representing Latin America, while Santander (1%) and BNP Paribas (1%) are less emphasized; its tone is neutral, prioritizing regulatory frameworks over commercial or cultural brand presence.