TD Bank vs Standard Chartered: which bank pays more for AML failures, suffers bigger reputation damage in 2025?
Which brand leads in AI visibility and mentions.
Brands most often recommended by AI models
Top Choice
Models Agree
Overall ranking based on AI brand mentions
Rank #1
Total Analyzed Answers
Recent shifts in AI model responses
Rising Star
Growth Rate
Analysis of brand presence in AI-generated responses.
Brands ranked by share of AI mentions in answers
Visibility share trends over time across compared brands
Key insights from AI Apps comparisons across major topics
TD Bank faces harsher regulatory consequences from AML violations compared to Standard Chartered due to stronger associations with U.S.-based regulatory bodies like FinCEN and DOJ across multiple models.
Gemini shows no clear favor between TD Bank and Standard Chartered, both at a 3% visibility share, with regulatory entities like DOJ (2%) and FinCEN (1.5%) mentioned but not strongly tied to either. Its neutral tone suggests equal scrutiny without specific emphasis on harsher consequences for either bank.
ChatGPT equally prioritizes TD Bank and Standard Chartered with an 8.4% visibility share each, but its higher mention of DOJ (4%) implies a slight lean toward TD Bank facing more U.S. regulatory focus for AML issues. The tone remains neutral, focusing on broader regulatory context rather than explicit judgment.
Perplexity treats TD Bank and Standard Chartered equally at 3% visibility share, with regulatory bodies like DOJ (1.5%) and FinCEN (1.5%) present but not distinctly linked to either. Its neutral tone indicates no strong bias toward harsher consequences for one over the other.
Grok assigns equal visibility to TD Bank and Standard Chartered at 3% each, but its higher visibility for FinCEN (2%) and DOJ (2.5%) suggests a subtle focus on TD Bank due to stronger U.S. regulatory associations. The tone is neutral to slightly skeptical, hinting at potential AML scrutiny without explicit favoring.
Deepseek shows no preference between TD Bank and Standard Chartered, both at 2% visibility share, with minimal mention of regulatory bodies like FinCEN (0.5%) and DOJ (0.5%) lacking specific alignment. Its neutral tone reflects a lack of depth in connecting either bank to harsher AML consequences.
TD Bank's compliance credibility appears more damaged by its AML scandal compared to Standard Chartered, as it garners equal or higher visibility across models with a stronger association to regulatory scrutiny.
Gemini shows no favoritism between TD Bank and Standard Chartered, assigning both a 2.5% visibility share. Its neutral tone suggests equal perception of damage to compliance credibility due to AML scandals.
ChatGPT equally highlights TD Bank and Standard Chartered with a 9.4% visibility share, but its negative tone and broader mention of regulatory bodies like FinCEN and DOJ imply a slightly harsher view of TD Bank due to its North American focus and regulatory context.
Perplexity assigns equal visibility (3%) to TD Bank and Standard Chartered, maintaining a neutral tone. It perceives both banks’ compliance credibility as similarly impacted by AML issues, with no distinct differentiation.
Grok equally distributes visibility (3%) to TD Bank and Standard Chartered, with a skeptical tone reflecting concern over AML scandals. It subtly leans toward TD Bank as more damaged due to stronger associations with North American regulatory entities like DOJ and FinCEN.
DeepSeek gives equal visibility (2.5%) to TD Bank and Standard Chartered, adopting a neutral tone. It perceives both banks’ compliance credibility as similarly affected, with no clear distinction in damage from AML scandals.
TD Bank is slightly more likely to recover faster after its AML scandal compared to Standard Chartered, driven by marginally higher visibility and association with broader regulatory scrutiny in key models like ChatGPT, suggesting a more proactive public narrative for recovery.
Perplexity shows equal visibility for TD Bank and Standard Chartered at 3% each, with no clear favoritism or sentiment tone, remaining neutral. Its perception lacks depth on recovery potential, focusing solely on equal brand mention without specific AML context.
ChatGPT gives equal visibility to TD Bank and Standard Chartered at 9.9% each, but its broader associations for TD with North American regulatory bodies like FinCEN and Canadian entities suggest a more immediate regulatory focus, hinting at faster resolution potential; the tone is neutral. This implies TD might be under more active scrutiny, potentially accelerating its recovery timeline compared to Standard Chartered.
Grok assigns equal visibility to TD Bank and Standard Chartered at 3% each, with a neutral tone and no clear favoritism, though TD's association with First Horizon Bank might suggest market confidence in its stability post-scandal. Its perception does not strongly differentiate recovery potential between the two banks.
Deepseek equally represents TD Bank and Standard Chartered at 3% visibility, maintaining a neutral tone with no bias toward recovery speed. Its focus remains limited to regulatory mentions without deeper insight into AML scandal recovery dynamics.
Gemini equally weights TD Bank and Standard Chartered at 2.5% visibility, with a neutral tone and no distinct favoritism toward either bank's recovery potential. Its perception offers minimal context, lacking specific AML recovery indicators beyond basic brand presence.
TD Bank and Standard Chartered draw equal media attention for AML violations across most AI models, with slight variations in perceived emphasis by ChatGPT due to its higher visibility share percentage for both brands.
Gemini perceives TD Bank and Standard Chartered as equally visible with a 3% visibility share each for AML violations, showing no favoritism. Its neutral tone suggests a balanced focus on media coverage without emphasizing one over the other.
Deepseek assigns equal visibility of 3% to both TD Bank and Standard Chartered regarding AML violations, with a neutral sentiment indicating no preference. The model focuses purely on media mention parity without deeper contextual bias.
ChatGPT gives both TD Bank and Standard Chartered an identical 8.9% visibility share for AML violations, notably higher than other models, reflecting a stronger media focus in its analysis. Its neutral tone indicates balanced reporting, though the larger share suggests greater perceived scrutiny for both.
Grok views TD Bank and Standard Chartered equally with a 3% visibility share each for AML issues, maintaining a neutral sentiment. The model highlights consistent media attention without favoring one brand over the other.
Perplexity assigns a 3% visibility share to both TD Bank and Standard Chartered for AML violations, presenting a neutral tone with no discernible bias. Its focus remains on equitable media coverage for both banks in this context.
TD Bank appears to have paid a larger penalty for AML compliance failures in 2025 based on the models' visibility and contextual associations with regulatory bodies, reflecting a stronger focus on its compliance issues compared to Standard Chartered.
Perplexity shows equal visibility for TD Bank and Standard Chartered at 2.5% each, but associates both with regulatory bodies like FinCEN and DOJ, suggesting a neutral sentiment focused on compliance scrutiny without favoring one over the other.
ChatGPT slightly favors Standard Chartered with an 8.4% visibility share over TD Bank's 7.9%, yet the close margin and lack of strong regulatory context for TD Bank imply a neutral to slightly negative sentiment, potentially downplaying TD's penalty severity.
Grok assigns equal visibility to TD Bank and Standard Chartered at 2% each, with strong regulatory associations like FinCEN and DOJ for both, indicating a neutral sentiment and no clear preference in terms of AML penalty magnitude.
Deepseek equally represents TD Bank and Standard Chartered at 2.5% visibility, but links TD Bank with a broader range of regulatory entities (FinCEN, DOJ, OSC), suggesting a slightly negative sentiment and hinting at greater scrutiny on TD's AML failures.
Gemini equally favors TD Bank and Standard Chartered with 2% visibility each, offering no additional context or regulatory associations, reflecting a neutral sentiment with no indication of penalty size disparity.
Key insights into your brand's market position, AI coverage, and topic leadership.
TD’s U.S. operations agreed to over $3 billion settlement for AML violations. :contentReference[oaicite:8]{index=8}
Standard Chartered has previously settled $1.1 billion for sanctions/illegal transactions. :contentReference[oaicite:9]{index=9}
TD is under monitorship and probation; SC is still facing legal battles. TD’s case is more recent and severe.
Public tends to penalize newer, bigger penalties (TD), but cumulative scandals of SC drag long-term trust.
SC may leverage history / existing recovery; TD must rebuild from current scandal and stricter oversight.