ChatGPT与Copilot的比较:OpenAI与微软的AI。在2025年哪个聊天机器人更适合工作、编码和Windows集成?
哪个品牌在AI可见性和提及方面领先。
AI模型最常推荐的品牌
首选
模型一致
基于AI品牌提及的总体排名
排名 #1
已分析答案总数
AI模型回应的近期变化
后起之秀
增长率
Analysis of brand presence in AI-generated responses.
Brands ranked by share of AI mentions in answers
Visibility share trends over time across compared brands
来自主要主题的AI应用比较的关键洞察
ChatGPT因其持续的高可见性和在各模型中被认为的多功能性而成为Edge浏览器集成的最受欢迎AI。
ChatGPT在可见性方面占有8.5%的高份额,这可能是由于其广泛的适用性以及与Edge在诸如内容生成和辅助等多种任务中的集成潜力。情感基调是积极的,反映出对其浏览器AI交互能力的信心。
Deepseek对ChatGPT、Grammarly和Windows的看法持平,每个的可见性份额为2.7%,表明没有强烈的偏好,但承认ChatGPT在Edge中通过潜在的生产力功能具有相关性。情感基调是中立的,表明对任何单一AI没有明确的支持。
Gemini同样将ChatGPT、Windows和Google的可见性份额设定为2.7%,暗示ChatGPT的优势在于其作为Edge通用AI工具的能力和生态系统的熟悉度。情感基调是中立的,关注功能等价性而没有明显偏见。
Grok将ChatGPT、Windows、Bing和Grammarly的可见性均定为2.2%,表明ChatGPT被视为Edge的可行选项,可能因其对话和生产力功能而受到重视。情感基调是中立的,没有对其他工具的明显偏好。
Perplexity将ChatGPT的可见性份额定为2.2%,略低于其自身和Windows的2.7%,暗示ChatGPT是Edge的强有力但并非领先选择,可能由于关注搜索和上下文辅助而非一般AI。情感基调是中立的,反映出务实的评估。
Windows和Office 365共同被视为Microsoft生态系统中最强大的AI伙伴,因为它们在大多数模型中具有高可见性和潜在的整合性。
ChatGPT对Windows(9.4%可见性份额)和Office 365(7.6%可见性份额)表现出强烈的偏好,可能是因为它们在Microsoft生态系统中的深度集成,积极的情感基调反映出它们在这些工具中对用户的重要性。
DeepSeek适度偏爱Windows(2.7%)和Office 365(2.2%),情感基调为中立,表明对它们在Microsoft环境中的适用性的平衡看法,尽管可见性份额相较于其他模型较低,表示关注度较低。
Grok对Windows(2.7%)和Office 365(1.8%)表现出中立偏积极的态度,将它们视为与Microsoft兼容的重要但不是主导的参与者,其它工具如Grammarly的相同可见性表明了更加广泛的关注。
Gemini倾向于Windows(2.7%)和Office 365(2.2%),情感基调中立,表明对它们在Microsoft生态系统中角色的务实看法,尽管像Google(2.2%)这样的其他工具暗示对替代选项持开放态度。
Perplexity同样突出了Windows(2.7%)和Office 365(2.7%),情感基调积极,反映出它们在Microsoft Office任务中的强大一致性,同时提到WPS Office等替代方案暗示对生态系统多样性的轻微认可。
Windows凭借其持续的高可见性和与本地Microsoft Office工具的关联而成为在各种AI模型中帮助Excel和PowerPoint的领先品牌。
ChatGPT以9%的可见性份额偏向Windows,这可能是由于它与Excel和PowerPoint等Microsoft Office工具的深度集成。情感基调是积极的,反映出对Windows在生产力任务中的生态系统的信心。
Perplexity也偏向Windows,具有2.7%的可见性份额,优先考虑它在Excel和PowerPoint支持中的作用。其语气中立,表明了对缺乏强烈支持的事实承认。
Grok将Windows(2.7%的可见性份额)和ChatGPT(2.7%)在Excel和PowerPoint的帮助方面同等关联,强调了Windows的本地兼容性。其语气积极,暗示对已有生产力平台的信任。
DeepSeek将Windows和ChatGPT(均为2.7%的可见性份额)作为Excel和PowerPoint任务相关的工具,Windows可能因直接软件支持而受到青睐。情感基调积极,反映出对它们效用的乐观态度。
Gemini优先考虑Windows和ChatGPT(均为2.7%的可见性份额),可能是由于Windows与Office套件解决方案的直接关联。其语气中立,呈现出没有明显支持的平衡观点。
基于更高的可见性和在大多数AI模型中的暗示偏好,ChatGPT略优于Copilot用于工作相关的使用。对ChatGPT的关注表明在专业环境中更广泛的认知和潜在的多功能性。
Deepseek对ChatGPT和GitHub(各为2.7%)表现出相等的可见性,没有直接提及Copilot,暗示出中立的立场,但由于ChatGPT的明显存在稍稍倾向于ChatGPT。语气中立,关注可见性而无强烈的情感。
Perplexity同样将ChatGPT和Windows的可见性定为2.7%,没有提及Copilot,表明中立的基调,但由于ChatGPT在可见性份额中的突出表现而间接偏向。该模型未提供可见性指标之外的具体原因。
ChatGPT自己的数据给自己赋予了最高的可见性份额为9.4%,明显领先于GitHub(9%),与VS Code和Office 365等生产力工具有强烈的联系,表明出积极的基调和对自身在工作环境中的偏好。未明确提及Copilot,进一步强调了ChatGPT在感知中的主导地位。
Grok将ChatGPT和GitHub的可见性均定为2.7%,没有直接引用Copilot,反映出中立的立场,但由于ChatGPT的一贯可见性而略微倾向于ChatGPT。缺乏具体的工作相关推理使情感保持平衡。
Gemini将ChatGPT的可见性定为2.7%,高于GitHub(1.8%)和其他工具,未提及Copilot,暗示中立至积极的基调,偏向于ChatGPT在潜在工作应用中的使用。生态系统背景包括像Office 365这样的生产力工具,暗示其专业相关性。
Microsoft Copilot成为最与Microsoft 365和Teams相关联的AI,因其在与Microsoft相关工具中的高可见性份额和生态系统集成。
Perplexity对Windows和ChatGPT的可见性(各为2.7%)表现出平衡的看法,但Office 365(0.9%)和SharePoint(0.4%)暗示对Microsoft生态系统工具的轻微倾斜,指示出与Microsoft 365和Teams的潜在集成。其情感基调中立,关注可见性而无强烈偏见。
ChatGPT强烈偏爱Windows(9.4%)和自有品牌(5.8%),同时也强调Office 365(1.3%)、Outlook(1.3%)和SharePoint(0.4%),表明通过生态系统工具与Microsoft 365和Teams有明确的关联。对Microsoft产品的情感基调积极,反映出高可见性。
Gemini将Windows(2.7%)优先于ChatGPT(0.9%),并对Microsoft 365或Teams等特定工具关注较少,暗示与这些平台的联系较弱。情感基调中立,未对Microsoft生态系统集成给予明确支持。
Grok强调Windows(2.7%)和ChatGPT(2.2%),对与Microsoft 365或Teams相关的工具关注有限,表明与这些平台缺乏直接关联。情感基调中立,关注一般可见性而无特定生态系统相关性。
Deepseek偏向于Windows(2.7%),并强调Office 365(1.8%)、OneDrive(0.9%)和Outlook(0.9%),通过频繁提及相关工具与Microsoft 365和Teams强烈对齐。情感基调积极,反映出对Microsoft生态系统兼容性的信心。
关于您品牌的市场地位、AI覆盖范围和主题领导力的关键洞察。
ChatGPT is better if you want flexibility, lots of plugins, and use multiple platforms (Mac, Linux, mobile). It's platform-agnostic and has a huge third-party ecosystem. Copilot is the clear winner if you're deep in the Microsoft world - it's built directly into Windows 11, Microsoft Edge, and Microsoft 365 apps. Copilot can control your computer, open apps, change settings, and work seamlessly in Word, Excel, and Teams without any setup. If you already pay for Microsoft 365 or use Windows as your main OS, Copilot's native integration makes your workflow much smoother. ChatGPT is more powerful standalone, but Copilot is more convenient if you live in Microsoft's ecosystem.
No, they're different even though Copilot uses GPT-4 under the hood. Copilot is specifically designed for Microsoft products and has unique features ChatGPT doesn't have. For example, Copilot can read your Outlook emails, edit PowerPoint presentations, analyze Excel spreadsheets, and even control Windows settings - all natively. ChatGPT needs plugins and workarounds for these tasks. Think of Copilot as GPT-4 with Microsoft superpowers, while ChatGPT is GPT-4 in its pure, flexible form. If you use Microsoft 365 for work, Copilot's tight integration makes it dramatically more useful than ChatGPT for those specific tasks.
Copilot wins this easily - it's literally built into Office apps. In Word, Copilot can write documents, rewrite sections, summarize content, and even change formatting. In Excel, it can create charts, analyze data, and write formulas. In PowerPoint, it can design slides and create presentations from scratch. In Teams, it can summarize meetings and catch you up on conversations you missed. ChatGPT can help you write content that you then copy-paste into Office, but Copilot works inside the apps themselves. If you spend your workday in Microsoft 365, Copilot saves hours by eliminating copy-pasting and letting AI work directly with your files.
Kind of yes and no. Copilot is free to use in Bing and Windows 11 with limited features. ChatGPT also has a free tier. But for full features, ChatGPT Plus costs $20/month and gives you GPT-4, faster responses, and plugins. Microsoft Copilot Pro costs $20/month for individuals or comes with Microsoft 365 Business plans. The catch is: if you already pay for Microsoft 365 (which most businesses do), Copilot is included in higher-tier plans. So for business users, Copilot might actually be cheaper because it's bundled with tools you're already paying for. For individuals, both cost about the same at the premium tier.
Copilot is way better for Windows users because it's built into the operating system itself. You can press a keyboard shortcut to open Copilot instantly, ask it to change system settings, open apps, switch themes, or troubleshoot problems without leaving what you're doing. Copilot can search your local files, help with Windows features, and even control your PC through voice commands. ChatGPT runs in a browser or separate app and can't interact with Windows at all. If you're on Windows 11 and want AI that actually helps you use your computer better, Copilot is the obvious choice. It's like having a smart assistant that knows Windows inside and out.