Global Banking Drama 2025

ChatGPT highlights Standard Chartered with an 8.2% visibility share, tying it with several other banks, suggesting a significant focus on its involvement in scandals. The tone is neutral, focusing on visibility data without explicit sentiment, indicating broad awareness of potential brand risk in Asia.

Grok assigns Standard Chartered a 2.7% visibility share, equal to other banks like Goldman Sachs, but notes regional banks like DBS, implying a focus on Asia-specific exposure. Its tone remains neutral, emphasizing regional relevance over explicit negative sentiment.

Perplexity gives Standard Chartered a lower 1.4% visibility share, showing less emphasis compared to other models, with a neutral tone that does not prioritize it over other brands. The perception leans toward a broader, less focused concern on Asian brand risk.

Gemini attributes a 2.7% visibility share to Standard Chartered, aligning it with other global banks, and includes regional players like DBS, hinting at Asia-centric exposure risks. The tone is neutral, focusing on comparative visibility without sharp criticism.

Deepseek does not mention Standard Chartered, instead focusing on regional players like DBS (2.7% visibility share) and issues tied to regulatory bodies like the Monetary Authority of Singapore, indicating a Asia-specific risk lens. The tone is neutral, prioritizing local ecosystem concerns over global bank scandals.

Deutsche Bank holds the highest visibility share at 2.7%, likely due to ongoing regulatory scrutiny and financial challenges. Sentiment tone is neutral, focusing on factual reporting of headline presence without strong bias.

Credit Suisse leads with an 8.2% visibility share, reflecting extensive coverage tied to its high-profile collapse and merger with UBS. Sentiment tone is skeptical, hinting at systemic issues in the bank's operations fueling global attention.

UBS and Silicon Valley Bank share the highest visibility at 2.7%, with Credit Suisse at 1.4%, suggesting a split focus on multiple banking crises, though no dominant scandal emerges. Sentiment tone is neutral, with an emphasis on diverse media sources driving headlines.

Both UBS and Credit Suisse share a 2.7% visibility share, with their intertwined narrative of merger following scandal drawing significant attention in headlines. Sentiment tone is neutral, focusing on factual reporting with references to credible sources like Financial Times.

Credit Suisse, UBS, Silicon Valley Bank, and Signet each hold a 2.7% visibility share, with Credit Suisse's prominence tied to its recent crisis and acquisition story. Sentiment tone is slightly negative, reflecting concern over stability in the banking sector as a headline driver.

Grok shows equal visibility (2.7%) for multiple banks like Lloyds, Barclays, HSBC, and Goldman Sachs in connection to mis-selling scandals, indicating no clear favoritism. Its tone is neutral, focusing on balanced representation without explicit sentiment toward any single entity.

Perplexity distributes visibility evenly (2.7%) across banks like Lloyds, Goldman Sachs, and TD Bank for mis-selling scandals, with no standout focus. The tone remains neutral, emphasizing factual association over critical judgment.

ChatGPT highlights Lloyds with the highest visibility share (8.2%) linked to mis-selling scandals in 2025, alongside Sepah Bank and Goldman Sachs at 6.8%. Its tone is skeptical, leaning toward critical associations with regulatory bodies like the Financial Conduct Authority, suggesting deeper scrutiny.

Deepseek assigns equal visibility (2.7%) to Lloyds, Barclays, HSBC, and others in relation to mis-selling scandals, showing no distinct bias. The tone is neutral, with a slight nod to regulatory oversight via the Financial Conduct Authority, but without strong Sentiment.

Gemini evenly spreads visibility (2.7%) across Lloyds, Standard Chartered, and Goldman Sachs for mis-selling scandals, lacking a dominant focus. Its tone is neutral, mentioning regulatory entities like the Financial Conduct Authority without overt criticism.

Deepseek shows equal visibility share (2.7%) for Sepah Bank, Lloyds, Standard Chartered, Goldman Sachs, Reyl & Cie, JPMorgan Chase, and Capital One, suggesting a neutral tone with no clear favoring of banks denying or accepting fault. Its perception leans toward highlighting a broad set of banks without specific sentiment on breach accountability.

Gemini distributes visibility evenly (1.4%) across multiple banks like Sepah Bank, Lloyds, and JPMorgan Chase, with a neutral tone and no distinct emphasis on breach denial or acceptance. Its reasoning appears to focus on general brand presence rather than specific accountability patterns.

Perplexity assigns higher visibility (2.7%) to Sepah Bank, Lloyds, Standard Chartered, Goldman Sachs, and Reyl & Cie, adopting a neutral-to-skeptical tone by not differentiating on fault admission. It seems to imply these banks are less associated with public fault acceptance compared to smaller entities like Target.

ChatGPT emphasizes Sepah Bank, Lloyds, Standard Chartered, Goldman Sachs, and Reyl & Cie with the highest visibility share (6.8%), while also noting Equifax (5.5%) and Capital One (5.5%), with a slightly negative tone toward the latter two for known breach incidents. Its perception suggests a contrast between banks denying breaches and those forced to accept fault due to public exposure.

Grok highlights Equifax and JPMorgan Chase with a 2.7% visibility share, leaning toward a skeptical tone by associating Equifax with well-documented breach accountability. It perceives a divide where smaller or regulatory entities like FDIC are less tied to denial compared to larger institutions.

Perplexity does not highlight a clear leader for mis-selling or data breach issues, with equal visibility shares (2.7%) for brands like Sepah Bank, Lloyds, Standard Chartered, Goldman Sachs, and Reyl & Cie. Its neutral tone indicates no specific sentiment or focus on these issues for any single bank.

Gemini spreads visibility evenly (1.4%) across multiple brands, including Wells Fargo, HSBC, and Lloyds, without a dominant focus on mis-selling or data breaches. Its neutral tone suggests a lack of pointed criticism or prioritization of any bank for these specific issues.

ChatGPT assigns higher visibility (4.1%) to brands like Barclays, Sepah Bank, Lloyds, Standard Chartered, Goldman Sachs, and Reyl & Cie, but also mentions Wells Fargo (1.4%) in relation to mis-selling or breach concerns. Its tone is slightly skeptical, implying a broader concern for systemic issues across banks.

Grok emphasizes Wells Fargo and Barclays with higher visibility shares (2.7%) compared to others, likely tying Wells Fargo to past mis-selling scandals and potential data vulnerabilities. Its tone is skeptical, reflecting a critical stance on institutional accountability for these issues.

Deepseek gives equal visibility (2.7%) to several banks, including Wells Fargo, Sepah Bank, Lloyds, Standard Chartered, Goldman Sachs, and Reyl & Cie, with a focus on Wells Fargo potentially linked to historical mis-selling and breach incidents. Its tone remains neutral but suggests awareness of recurring issues for certain banks.