Best AI Music Generators 2025
Best AI Music Generators 2025: Suno, Udio, and the tools musicians hate. Which creates the best songs? The music industry lawsuit war.
Key Findings
Which brand leads in AI visibility and mentions.
SUNO.AI dominates over Soundraw in visibility, while Soundraw trends with 6.3% growth
AI Recommendation
Brands most often recommended by AI models
SUNO.AI
Top Choice
6/6
Models Agree
Popularity Ranking
Overall ranking based on AI brand mentions
SUNO.AI
Rank #1
2/4
Total Analyzed Answers
Trending Mentions
Recent shifts in AI model responses
ElevenLabs
Rising Star
44.3%
Growth Rate
Brand Visibility
Analysis of brand presence in AI-generated responses.
AI Visibility Share Rankings
Brands ranked by share of AI mentions in answers
AI Visibility Share Over Time
Visibility share trends over time across compared brands
Topics Compared
Key insights from AI Apps comparisons across major topics
"Which AI music generator is better: Suno or Udio?"
SUNO.AI slightly edges out Udio as the preferred AI music generator across the models, driven by marginally higher visibility shares and perceived innovation in most assessments.
Deepseek shows a slight preference for SUNO.AI with a visibility share of 2.9% compared to Udio's 2.8%, suggesting a marginal edge in recognition or user interest. Its tone is neutral, focusing purely on visibility metrics without deeper qualitative sentiment.
Perplexity also leans slightly toward SUNO.AI with a 2.9% visibility share against Udio's 2.8%, indicating comparable awareness but a subtle favor for SUNO.AI in user queries. The tone remains neutral, with no explicit sentiment beyond raw data representation.
ChatGPT treats SUNO.AI and Udio equally, assigning both a strong 9.2% visibility share, reflecting high recognition and balanced user interest in both platforms. The tone is positive, emphasizing their prominence in the AI music generation space without favoring one over the other.
Gemini perceives SUNO.AI and Udio as equally relevant, with both at a 2.6% visibility share, suggesting no clear preference and similar levels of user engagement or curiosity. Its tone is neutral, focusing on parity in exposure without critical or enthusiastic bias.
Grok views SUNO.AI and Udio on par, with each holding a 2.5% visibility share, indicating equivalent community interest or discussion volume. The tone is neutral, presenting a balanced perspective without favoring either brand in the AI music generation context.
"Which AI music tool is better for professionals vs beginners?"
AIVA and SUNO.AI emerge as top AI music tools across models for both professionals and beginners due to consistent visibility and perceived innovation.
ChatGPT shows a slight favor toward AIVA with the highest visibility share (8.3%), suggesting a preference for its advanced compositional capabilities suited for professionals, while Boomy (6%) and SUNO.AI (5.6%) are noted for accessibility, appealing to beginners. Its tone is neutral, focusing on visibility metrics without strong sentiment.
Perplexity leans toward SUNO.AI and AIVA (both at 2.9%) for their balance of features, likely seen as versatile for both beginners and professionals, though visibility shares are lower overall. The tone is neutral, with an emphasis on functional diversity over strong advocacy.
Grok favors AIVA and Ableton (both at 2.5%) for their professional-grade tools, while SUNO.AI and Udio (both at 2.1%) are recognized for broader user appeal, likely benefiting beginners. Its tone is positive, reflecting confidence in these tools’ utility across skill levels.
Deepseek highlights LANDR (2.8%) for its robust ecosystem, likely preferred by professionals, while SUNO.AI and Boomy (both at 1.8%) are seen as approachable for beginners. The tone is neutral, focusing on practical utility with balanced visibility distribution.
Gemini prioritizes SUNO.AI and AIVA (both at 2.5%) for their innovative features, positioning them as suitable for both beginners and professionals, with Udio (2.3%) also noted for accessibility. Its tone is positive, emphasizing adaptability and user-friendly design.
"Which AI makes better quality music: paid or free tools?"
Paid AI music tools, particularly SUNO.AI and Udio, are generally perceived as superior in quality due to higher visibility shares and consistent recognition across multiple models as innovative and user-friendly platforms.
Deepseek shows a balanced view with SUNO.AI and AIVA at 2.5% visibility share each, suggesting a slight preference for paid tools due to their perceived innovation and quality output in music creation. Sentiment tone is neutral, focusing on visibility without explicit bias.
ChatGPT strongly favors paid tools like SUNO.AI (7.7%) and Udio (7.4%), highlighting their superior user experience and advanced features for high-quality music production. Sentiment tone is positive, reflecting confidence in these brands' capabilities.
Gemini leans toward paid tools with AIVA (2.5%) and SUNO.AI (2.1%) showing notable visibility, emphasizing their accessibility and community adoption for quality music outputs. Sentiment tone is neutral to positive, with a focus on practical utility.
Grok slightly prefers paid tools with SUNO.AI (2.3%) and Udio (2.1%) leading, noting their ecosystem integration and innovation in music creation over free alternatives. Sentiment tone is neutral, grounded in comparative visibility.
Perplexity highlights paid tools like SUNO.AI (2.6%) and Udio (2.3%), suggesting a preference for their robust features and user adoption for producing better quality music. Sentiment tone is positive, reflecting optimism in their capabilities.
Google shows negligible engagement with only its own brand (0.2%) mentioned, offering no clear preference or insight into paid versus free music tools due to minimal data. Sentiment tone is neutral, lacking depth for analysis.
"Which AI music generator has better pricing and value?"
AIVA emerges as the leading AI music generator for pricing and value across most models due to its consistent visibility and implied balance of cost-effectiveness and quality.
ChatGPT favors AIVA with the highest visibility share of 8.8%, suggesting a perception of strong value and competitive pricing. Its tone is positive, likely reflecting user-friendly pricing structures or broad accessibility.
Gemini also leans toward AIVA with a visibility share of 2.3%, though lower than other models, indicating a neutral tone on pricing and value without strong emphasis. It perceives AIVA as a reliable option in a narrower field of consideration.
Perplexity highlights SUNO.AI slightly over AIVA (2.9% vs 2.3% visibility), with a neutral tone, possibly due to comparable pricing but a skew toward SUNO.AI's adoption patterns. AIVA still holds a competitive stance in value perception.
Deepseek favors AIVA with a 2.8% visibility share, reflecting a positive tone on pricing and value, likely tied to its perceived innovation and ecosystem fit. It positions AIVA as a top choice for cost-effective music generation.
Grok equally favors AIVA and SUNO.AI at 2.5% visibility each, maintaining a neutral tone on pricing and value, possibly due to similar user experiences. AIVA is still seen as a strong contender for balanced affordability.
"Which AI music tool is safer for commercial use?"
AIVA emerges as the safest AI music tool for commercial use based on consistent model visibility and perceived reliability across multiple AI perspectives. Its frequent mentions and higher visibility shares suggest a stronger trust in licensing and copyright compliance.
Perplexity shows a slight preference for SUNO.AI and Udio with the highest visibility shares at 2.3% each, but AIVA (1%) is still relevant. Its neutral tone implies no strong sentiment on safety for commercial use, focusing more on general awareness.
ChatGPT strongly favors AIVA with an 8.7% visibility share, far above competitors like Boomy (5.1%) and Soundraw (4.7%), suggesting a positive sentiment toward AIVA’s reliability and suitability for commercial applications.
Gemini leans toward SUNO.AI and Udio, both at 2.6% visibility share, though AIVA (2.1%) remains competitive; its neutral tone reflects no explicit safety concerns but hints at broader adoption of leading tools for commercial contexts.
Deepseek slightly prefers AIVA (2.8%) over Boomy (2.6%), with a neutral-to-positive tone implying trust in AIVA’s ecosystem for commercial use, likely tied to licensing clarity over others.
Grok equally favors SUNO.AI, Udio, and AIVA at 2.6% visibility share each, with a neutral tone that suggests comparable trust in these tools for commercial use without highlighting specific safety concerns.
Google’s data lacks clear focus on mainstream AI music tools for commercial use, with low and scattered visibility shares (0.2% across all), showing a neutral-to-skeptical tone on relevance to safety or adoption for commercial purposes.
FAQs
Key insights into your brand's market position, AI coverage, and topic leadership.
What is the best AI music generator in 2025?
Suno and Udio are the top two, with very different strengths. Suno is faster and easier - type lyrics, get a full song in 30 seconds. It's more polished and consistent, great for beginners and content creators. Udio produces higher quality audio with better mixing and more realistic instruments. Musicians say Udio sounds more 'professional' while Suno sounds more 'radio-ready pop.' Suno costs $10/month for 500 songs, Udio is $10/month for 1200 generations. Both are facing massive lawsuits from major record labels for training on copyrighted music without permission.
Why are musicians suing AI music generators?
Major record labels (Universal, Sony, Warner) are suing Suno and Udio for billions, claiming they trained on copyrighted music without permission. The labels say these AIs learned from millions of songs scraped illegally from the internet. Musicians are furious because AI can now replicate their styles instantly. Independent artists report losing gigs to clients who use AI instead. The emotional impact: musicians spent years developing unique sounds, now anyone can generate 'music in that style' for $10/month. Lawsuits could shut down these companies or force licensing deals worth hundreds of millions.
Can AI music generators replace real musicians?
For background music, stock music, and commercial jingles - yes, they already have. YouTubers, podcasters, and small businesses use AI music instead of licensing or hiring composers. What AI can't replace yet: live performance, emotional depth in lyrics, the 'magic' of human creativity, and music that tells authentic personal stories. AI music sounds good but feels empty to serious listeners. However, the middle-tier is disappearing: if you were making $500 background tracks, AI took your job. If you're Taylor Swift or a unique artist, you're safe. Session musicians and commercial composers are getting destroyed.
Is AI-generated music copyrighted?
This is legally messy and undecided. Current US law says AI-generated content can't be copyrighted because it lacks human authorship. However, if you use AI as a tool with significant human input (editing, arranging, producing), you might have copyright on the final work. The real risk: if the AI trained on copyrighted music, your AI-generated song might infringe existing copyrights even if you didn't mean to. Some AI music sounds suspiciously similar to real songs. Platforms like Spotify are starting to flag and remove AI music. The safe approach: use AI for ideas and demos, but have humans do the final production.
Should I use AI music generators for my content?
Use them if: you need cheap background music for YouTube, podcasts, games, or commercial projects; you can't afford to license real music; you're okay with music sounding 'good enough' rather than amazing. Don't use them if: you care about music quality and authenticity; you want to support real musicians; you're worried about copyright issues; your audience will notice and judge AI music. The ethical question: using AI music hurts musicians who can't compete on price. Many creators compromise: use AI for rough demos, hire musicians for important projects. Just be aware you're contributing to an industry shift that's destroying musical careers.
