
Hollywood vs AI 2025: SAG-AFTRA strike, AI actors replacing humans, screenwriters vs ChatGPT. The entertainment industry meltdown.
Which brand leads in AI visibility and mentions.
Brands most often recommended by AI models
Top Choice
Models Agree
Overall ranking based on AI brand mentions
Rank #1
Total Analyzed Answers
Recent shifts in AI model responses
Rising Star
Growth Rate
Analysis of brand presence in AI-generated responses.
Brands ranked by share of AI mentions in answers
Visibility share trends over time across compared brands
Key insights from AI Apps comparisons across major topics
Actors, represented by SAG-AFTRA, are perceived as more threatened by AI than writers, due to higher visibility in discussions across models and specific concerns about voice and image replication technologies.
ChatGPT shows a slight favor toward SAG-AFTRA with a higher visibility share (6.2%) compared to Writers Guild of America (4%), indicating actors face more immediate AI threats through voice and image technologies like ElevenLabs. Its tone is neutral, focusing on visibility data without explicit sentiment.
Gemini slightly leans toward SAG-AFTRA (3.7%) over Writers Guild of America (3.4%) in visibility, suggesting a marginal concern for actors due to AI tools like RunwayML impacting visual content. The tone remains neutral, grounded in data without strong emotional bias.
Deepseek perceives equal threat to SAG-AFTRA and Writers Guild of America (both at 2.3%), but mentions tools like Respeecher that uniquely threaten actors via voice synthesis, indicating a subtle tilt toward actors’ vulnerability. Its tone is neutral, focused on technological implications.
Perplexity shows minimal focus on Writers Guild of America (0.3%) with no mention of SAG-AFTRA, suggesting a lack of emphasis on actors but limited data on writers’ AI threats as well. The tone is neutral, with sparse data limiting deeper insight.
Grok favors SAG-AFTRA (4%) over Writers Guild of America (3.4%) in visibility, emphasizing actors’ concerns with AI voice tools like ElevenLabs and cultural references like Star Wars, pointing to specific replacement fears. The tone is neutral but highlights actor-specific risks.
SAG-AFTRA's AI clauses are perceived as stronger protections compared to traditional rights across most models due to their relevance in addressing emerging technology threats in the entertainment industry.
ChatGPT shows a strong focus on SAG-AFTRA with a 14.4% visibility share, likely emphasizing AI clauses as a critical protection due to their timeliness in combating digital replication issues. The sentiment tone is positive, prioritizing SAG-AFTRA's proactive stance on AI over traditional rights.
Grok also favors SAG-AFTRA with a 5.1% visibility share, leaning toward AI clauses as stronger due to their alignment with modern industry challenges like deepfakes. Its tone is neutral-to-positive, focusing on SAG-AFTRA's relevance in current negotiations over traditional protections.
Gemini highlights SAG-AFTRA with a 4% visibility share, likely viewing AI clauses as more robust given their necessity in safeguarding actors against tech-driven exploitation. The sentiment is neutral, with a subtle preference for emerging protections over established rights.
Perplexity assigns SAG-AFTRA a 4% visibility share, suggesting a focus on AI clauses as a stronger shield due to growing concerns over digital rights in media. Its tone is neutral, with an implied preference for innovation-driven protections over traditional frameworks.
Deepseek prioritizes SAG-AFTRA with a 4.2% visibility share, likely favoring AI clauses for their forward-looking approach to protecting performers in a tech-heavy landscape. The sentiment is positive, underscoring the urgency of AI-specific safeguards over conventional rights.
Working actors are more likely to survive better than A-list stars due to their adaptability and diverse opportunities across platforms and union support, as reflected in the models' focus on broader industry structures over individual fame.
Gemini leans toward A-list stars with visibility tied to high-profile individuals like Tom Cruise and Margot Robbie (0.3% each) and associated brands like Game of Thrones (0.8%), suggesting a positive sentiment for star power as a marker of cultural impact. However, its focus remains split with broader entertainment brands, indicating limited emphasis on working actors.
Grok strongly favors working actors through its high visibility share for SAG-AFTRA (3.4%), reflecting a positive sentiment toward union support and collective bargaining as critical for survival. It also highlights industry players like Netflix (1.7%) over individual A-listers, emphasizing systemic opportunities over singular fame.
Perplexity adopts a neutral stance with a focus on working actors via resources like Central Casting (0.3%) and Acting Magazine (0.3%), suggesting accessibility to roles as key to survival. It shows minimal emphasis on A-list stars, with Oscars (0.8%) as a minor nod to prestige but not dominance.
ChatGPT supports working actors with a strong focus on SAG-AFTRA (3.4%) and platforms like TikTok (2%) and YouTube (1.7%), reflecting a positive sentiment for diverse, accessible opportunities over A-list exclusivity. Its data indicates survival through community-driven platforms rather than individual star power.
Deepseek shows a balanced but limited perspective, with equal visibility for SAG-AFTRA (0.6%) and Marvel (0.6%), suggesting a neutral sentiment toward both working actors and A-list project ecosystems. Its sparse data implies no clear favoritism but acknowledges structural support for actors broadly.
The gaming industry adapts better to AI than Hollywood, as per the collective insights from the models, primarily due to higher visibility of gaming-related brands and a focus on innovation-driven integration.
ChatGPT leans toward the gaming industry with a strong focus on brands like Unity (6.8%) and Unreal Engine (5.9%), suggesting AI's deep integration into game development tools; its tone is positive, emphasizing technological adoption over Hollywood's lower visibility brands like SAG-AFTRA (4%).
Grok favors gaming with mentions of Unity (2%) and No Man's Sky (2%), highlighting AI's role in procedural content and player engagement; its tone is positive for gaming, while Hollywood mentions like SAG-AFTRA (2.3%) reflect a neutral to cautious stance on labor concerns.
Perplexity shows a balanced view but slightly tilts toward gaming with Unity (1.4%) and Unreal Engine (1.7%), pointing to AI's practical use in development pipelines; its tone is neutral, with Hollywood brands like Netflix (1.1%) receiving less focus on AI adaptation.
Gemini appears split but leans toward Hollywood due to high visibility of SAG-AFTRA (3.7%) and Writers Guild of America (3.7%), focusing on AI's labor and ethical implications; its tone is skeptical for Hollywood, while gaming brands like Unity (1.7%) suggest steady but less urgent adoption.
DeepSeek favors gaming with No Man's Sky (2%) and Unity (1.1%), emphasizing AI's transformative potential in immersive experiences; its tone is positive for gaming, contrasting with a more neutral view of Hollywood through SAG-AFTRA (1.4%) and minimal innovation focus.
AI-driven content creation tools like Midjourney and Copy.ai are perceived as leading in content quality over human-centric platforms, driven by their innovative capabilities and growing visibility.
Grok favors AI content creation tools, particularly Midjourney (2.8% visibility share) and Copy.ai (1.7%), over human-centric platforms like YouTube or Netflix (both at 0.8%), likely due to their cutting-edge generative capabilities. Its sentiment tone is positive toward AI tools, emphasizing innovation in content creation.
ChatGPT shows a balanced but slightly AI-leaning perspective with visibility for Midjourney (0.6%) and itself (0.6%), while human-driven platforms like Associated Press and YouTube (both at 0.3%) lag, suggesting a preference for AI's efficiency in content generation. Its sentiment tone is neutral to slightly positive toward AI tools.
Gemini does not strongly favor AI or human creators, as it highlights a mix of lesser-known tools and human-centric sources like Wikipedia and Taylor & Francis (both at 0.3%), reflecting a focus on diverse content ecosystems rather than a clear preference. Its sentiment tone is neutral, with no dominant inclination toward either side.
Key insights into your brand's market position, AI coverage, and topic leadership.
The 2023 SAG-AFTRA and WGA strikes centered on AI threats. Writers struck because studios wanted to use ChatGPT to write scripts, then hire writers to 'polish' for less money. Actors struck because studios wanted to scan their likeness once, then use AI to create performances forever without additional pay. The nightmare scenario: you get paid for one day of scanning, then studios use your AI clone in unlimited projects while you get nothing. Background actors especially vulnerable - scan 100 extras once, use their AI versions forever. The studios' proposal was insulting: they'd 'own' actors' digital likenesses with minimal compensation. The strikes won some protections but the technology is advancing faster than contracts can control.
Background actors and commercial writers - already being replaced. Studios use AI extras in crowd scenes, AI stunt doubles, and AI-generated commercials. B-movie scripts are AI-written with human polish. Video game performances use AI voice clones. However, lead actors and prestige writers are safer - audiences want authentic human performances and original stories. AI can't replicate star charisma or write truly original narratives yet. The split: routine entertainment jobs (background acting, commercial scripts, stock footage) are gone. Creative leads and stars remain valuable. The middle is disappearing - character actors and working writers are struggling. Young actors can't build careers from background work anymore because those jobs don't exist.
Studios quietly use AI everywhere. De-aging: Marvel used AI to de-age actors in several films. Voice cloning: AI replaces actors for dubbing and ADR. Script analysis: AI reads scripts and predicts box office performance. CGI: AI speeds up VFX and creates backgrounds. Casting: AI analyzes actors' social media followings for casting decisions. The controversial stuff: some studios are building AI clone libraries of actors for future use, AI writes first drafts of scripts (especially in reality TV and soap operas), AI creates 'synthetic actors' for commercials. The technology exists to create entire movies with AI - some indie films already fully AI-generated. Major studios hold back due to unions and audience backlash, but the pressure is massive because AI is cheaper.
Union contracts now require: consent for AI use of likeness, compensation for each AI-generated performance, restrictions on how long studios can use AI clones, mandatory disclosure when AI is used. However, enforcement is difficult. Stars have leverage to negotiate AI protections. Unknown actors are forced to sign away AI rights to get work. The new strategy: actors watermark or limit their digital presence to prevent AI training. Some refuse projects requiring full-body scans. A-list actors negotiate 'no AI replacement' clauses. The pessimistic reality: individual resistance doesn't work when the industry shifts. If one actor refuses AI terms, studios hire someone who accepts. Only collective action through unions has power.
It will transform it brutally, but not kill it. The optimistic view: AI handles routine production, freeing humans for creative work. Costs drop, more diverse content gets made, indie creators access Hollywood-quality tools. The pessimistic view: AI concentrates power in studios, eliminates middle-class entertainment jobs, floods market with cheap AI content devaluing human work, and audiences accept AI entertainment as 'good enough.' The likely outcome: two-tier industry emerges. Premium human-made content for wealthy audiences who value authenticity. Cheap AI content for everyone else. Most entertainment jobs disappear. Superstar actors and directors remain valuable. Everyone else struggles. The cultural question: when entertainment is algorithmically generated to maximize engagement, do we lose human creativity and cultural expression?