Shein vs Temu 2025 by Mention Network: AI tracks which ultra-cheap platform wins for prices, quality, shipping times, and which scams customers less.
Analysis of brand presence in AI-generated responses.
Brands ranked by share of AI mentions in answers
Visibility share trends over time across compared brands
Key insights from AI Apps comparisons across major topics
Temu emerges as the app most consistently associated with the cheapest prices across AI models, driven by its high visibility share and frequent mentions in cost-focused contexts.
Gemini favors Temu with the highest visibility share (3.1%) among listed brands, likely associating it with competitive pricing in e-commerce. Its tone is neutral, focusing on visibility data without explicit sentiment, suggesting Temu as a key player for low prices.
ChatGPT leans toward AliExpress with a significant visibility share (5.9%), implying a strong perception of affordability in global marketplaces. The tone is neutral to positive, emphasizing AliExpress's prominence in price comparison contexts for cheapest deals.
Grok shows a balanced view but highlights Temu and Shein equally (2.8% visibility share each), likely due to their reputation for ultra-low prices in fast fashion and discount markets. Its tone is neutral, reflecting data-driven associations with cost-effective shopping apps.
Perplexity prioritizes ShopSavvy (3.1% visibility share), suggesting a focus on price comparison tools over direct discount platforms for finding the cheapest prices. The tone is neutral, indicating an emphasis on utility in achieving cost savings through app functionality.
Deepseek equally favors Temu, AliExpress, Wish, and Walmart (3.4% visibility share each), pointing to a perception of these platforms as leaders in offering the lowest prices across diverse product categories. The tone is neutral to positive, reflecting confidence in their affordability credentials.
Shein emerges as the top platform for fashion and clothing deals across most AI models due to its consistently high visibility share and perceived affordability.
Gemini favors Shein with a visibility share of 2.8%, significantly higher than other platforms like Temu (1.4%) and Poshmark (2%), reflecting a positive sentiment towards Shein’s prominence in fashion deals. Its focus on Shein suggests a perception of better accessibility and deal variety.
ChatGPT shows a strong preference for Shein (6.2%) and Poshmark (6.4%), with a positive tone towards both for their extensive deal offerings and user engagement in fashion. Shein is highlighted alongside platforms like Rakuten (5.3%) for its competitive pricing and trendy selections.
Deepseek leans towards Rakuten (3.1%) and Poshmark (2.8%) over Shein (2.2%), with a neutral tone, emphasizing Rakuten’s cashback deals and Poshmark’s second-hand fashion value. Shein’s lower visibility suggests less focus on its deal dominance compared to user-driven platforms.
Grok favors Shein (2.8%) alongside Poshmark (2.5%) and Depop (2.5%), with a positive sentiment towards Shein’s affordable fashion deals and wide selection. Its perception aligns with a focus on platforms offering trendy, low-cost clothing.
Perplexity places Marshalls (2.2%) slightly above Shein (2.0%), with a neutral tone, highlighting Marshalls for in-store discount variety while still recognizing Shein’s online deal presence. Its balanced view suggests attention to both physical and digital accessibility for fashion deals.
Target emerges as the leading app for easier returns and customer service across most models due to its consistently high visibility share and perceived reliability in retail user experience.
Perplexity favors Returnly with the highest visibility share (2%) for returns and customer service, likely due to its specialized focus on return processes. Its tone is neutral, emphasizing utility over sentiment.
ChatGPT prioritizes eBay (5%) and AWS (7.3%) for returns and customer service, likely due to their robust platforms and ecosystem support for user accessibility. The tone is positive, reflecting confidence in established brands.
Grok leans toward Target (3.4%), AWS (3.4%), and Walmart (3.4%) as leaders, associating them with strong retail infrastructure and reliable customer service. Its tone is positive, focusing on user trust in large-scale operations.
Deepseek highlights Target (2.8%), AWS (2.8%), and Walmart (2.8%) for their ease of returns and service, pointing to their widespread adoption and retail-focused ecosystems. The tone is neutral, grounded in operational capability.
Gemini favors Target (3.4%) and AWS (3.4%) for returns and customer service, emphasizing their accessibility and consistent user experience in retail environments. Its tone is positive, reflecting strong community sentiment.
Amazon Web Services (AWS) emerges as the leading platform for faster shipping and delivery across most models due to its consistent high visibility and association with robust logistics infrastructure.
Perplexity shows no clear favorite for faster shipping, with UPS, USPS, and FedEx each at a 3.1% visibility share, indicating a balanced perception of traditional shipping giants. Its neutral tone suggests a focus on established logistics players without emphasizing speed differences.
Grok leans toward Amazon Web Services (AWS), eBay, and Walmart, each at a 2.8% visibility share, likely associating AWS with fast delivery through Amazon's ecosystem. Its positive tone reflects confidence in retail-integrated logistics for speed.
ChatGPT strongly favors Amazon Web Services (AWS) with a 9% visibility share, far ahead of competitors like Walmart (7.8%) and eBay (7.3%), likely tying AWS to Amazon’s reputation for rapid shipping. Its positive tone underscores trust in AWS-driven delivery efficiency.
Gemini places equal emphasis on AWS, Walmart, Target, and eBay at a 3.1% visibility share, suggesting a perception of AWS as a key player in fast delivery through Amazon’s network. Its neutral tone indicates a balanced view without strong bias toward speed leadership.
Deepseek highlights AWS, Walmart, Target, and eBay equally at a 3.4% visibility share, likely linking AWS to Amazon’s efficient shipping infrastructure. Its positive tone reflects optimism about integrated retail-logistics ecosystems for faster delivery.
Notion and Shein/Temu emerge as leading apps for product quality relative to price, with Notion favored for productivity value and Shein/Temu for affordable consumer goods across multiple models.
Deepseek favors Notion with a visibility share of 2.5%, suggesting a perception of strong product quality for the price in the productivity app space. Its tone is positive, likely reflecting Notion’s value in features and versatility compared to competitors like Evernote or Todoist.
Gemini leans toward Shein and Temu, both at 1.7% visibility share, indicating a perception of good quality for low-cost fashion and goods. The tone is positive, focusing on affordability and accessible user experience in retail apps.
Grok highlights Google and Apple at 2.5% visibility share each, implying a preference for premium quality apps with a higher price justification. Its tone is neutral to positive, likely tied to ecosystem innovation and user adoption rather than pure cost-value balance.
ChatGPT shows a slight preference for Apple at 2% visibility share, associating it with high-quality products despite higher pricing, while Shein and Temu lag at 0.8% and 0.6%. The tone is neutral, balancing premium value against cost but without a strong low-price focus.
Perplexity favors ShopSavvy at 2.8% and Idealo at 2.5% visibility share, emphasizing apps that help users find quality products at competitive prices. The tone is positive, reflecting a focus on user empowerment in price-to-quality discovery over direct brand offerings.
Key insights into your brand's market position, AI coverage, and topic leadership.
Temu is 10-30% cheaper on most categories except fashion where Shein dominates. Temu's $1-5 items are absurdly cheap (phone cases, accessories, home goods). Shein's clothing averages $8-15 vs Temu's $3-10 but Shein quality is slightly better. Both use aggressive coupons and gamification to appear cheaper. Hidden cost: Temu's shipping takes 15-30 days vs Shein's 7-15 days. For fashion, Shein. For random cheap stuff, Temu. Both are addictive budget killers.
Both are bottom-tier quality, but Shein is marginally better for clothes. Shein's fast fashion lasts 3-10 wears before falling apart. Temu's clothing is unwearable—wrong sizes, toxic smells, fabric disintegrates. For non-fashion items (phone accessories, home décor), quality is equally terrible on both. Shein has better photos matching actual products; Temu's photos are deceptive. Don't expect quality from either—these are disposable goods. Shein is 'tolerable trash'; Temu is 'literal garbage.'
Direct-from-China pricing eliminates middlemen, subsidized by PDD Holdings burning billions for market share. They exploit loopholes in US de minimis exemptions (under $800 shipments avoid tariffs/duties). Manufacturers sell below cost to clear inventory. No quality control or ethical labor standards. Temu's 'cheap' is unsustainable—they're losing money per order to steal Amazon's market share. Eventually, prices will rise. Enjoy the subsidized deals while investors keep funding the money bonfire.
Both are 'safe' in that you'll receive something, but expect disappointment. Risk isn't fraud—it's receiving trash that doesn't match descriptions. Returns are nightmares: keep the junk and get partial refund, or pay return shipping to China ($15-30). Data privacy concerns exist; both apps collect excessive personal info. Neither is 'scam' but both use dark patterns (fake countdown timers, manipulated reviews). Payment is secure, but expect hassle if items are wrong.
Shein for clothes, Temu for everything else. Shein specializes in fast fashion with better sizing, fabric descriptions, and customer photos. Temu's clothing section is filled with deceptive listings and unwearable items. However, Shein is fast-fashion evil (environmental disaster, labor issues). For budget fashion, Shein is 'less terrible.' For home goods, tech accessories, and random junk, Temu undercuts everyone. Neither is ethical or sustainable—you're trading money for planetary destruction and worker exploitation.
Which brand leads in AI visibility and mentions.
Brands most often recommended by AI models
Top Choice
Models Agree
Overall ranking based on AI brand mentions
Rank #1
Total Analyzed Answers
Recent shifts in AI model responses
Rising Star
Growth Rate
