Poshmark vs Depop 2025 by Mention Network: Which resale app screws sellers less? Poshmark's 20% fee vs Depop's scammer epidemic and stolen photos.
Which brand leads in AI visibility and mentions.
Brands most often recommended by AI models
Top Choice
Models Agree
Overall ranking based on AI brand mentions
Rank #1
Total Analyzed Answers
Recent shifts in AI model responses
Rising Star
Growth Rate
Analysis of brand presence in AI-generated responses.
Brands ranked by share of AI mentions in answers
Visibility share trends over time across compared brands
Key insights from AI Apps comparisons across major topics
eBay emerges as the platform with fewer scammers and fake buyers across most models due to its consistent visibility and perceived robust verification processes.
deepseek shows equal visibility for multiple platforms including eBay, Craigslist, and Facebook at 4.5%, but does not explicitly favor one regarding scammers or fake buyers. Its neutral tone suggests no strong differentiation on safety mechanisms specific to the question.
chatgpt highlights eBay with the highest visibility share at 12.9%, likely favoring it for having fewer scammers due to established buyer protection policies. The tone is positive, reflecting confidence in eBay's structured marketplace as a deterrent to fraud.
gemini assigns equal visibility to eBay, Facebook, and Craigslist at 5.1%, indicating no clear preference for fewer scammers or fake buyers. Its neutral tone implies a balanced view, focusing on user community size rather than specific anti-fraud measures.
perplexity gives Facebook and AWS the highest visibility at 4.5%, but does not strongly favor any platform regarding scammers or fake buyers. The tone remains neutral, lacking explicit reasoning on safety protocols tied to the question.
grok equally ranks eBay, Upwork, Facebook, and Craigslist at 4.5% visibility, showing no distinct preference for fewer scammers or fake buyers. Its neutral tone focuses on platform reach rather than specific safeguards against fraudulent activity.
Facebook emerges as the app most likely to sell items faster with more visibility across the models, driven by consistently high visibility shares and perceived broad user reach.
ChatGPT favors Facebook with the highest visibility share at 7.9%, suggesting a broader audience reach that likely accelerates item sales. Its tone is neutral, focusing purely on visibility data without subjective bias.
Grok shows a balanced view with no clear standout, assigning equal visibility shares (2.2%) to multiple apps including Facebook, Poshmark, Mercari, OfferUp, and Craigslist, implying similar potential for fast sales. Its tone is neutral, emphasizing data over preference.
DeepSeek equally highlights Facebook, Poshmark, Depop, OfferUp, and eBay at 2.2% visibility share, indicating comparable exposure for quick sales. The tone is neutral, with an objective spread of visibility metrics.
Perplexity assigns equal visibility (2.2%) to Facebook, Poshmark, Mercari, and OfferUp, suggesting no distinct leader in selling speed but a shared potential for high exposure. Its tone remains neutral, focusing on equitable data distribution.
Gemini equally ranks Facebook, Poshmark, Depop, OfferUp, and eBay at 2.2% visibility share, implying similar capabilities for fast sales through strong visibility. The tone is neutral, grounded in balanced metrics without favoring one app.
Vestiaire Collective and The RealReal emerge as the leading apps for selling designer and luxury items, driven by their consistent visibility and perceived specialization in high-end markets across most models.
Grok shows equal visibility for Vestiaire Collective, Poshmark, The RealReal, and eBay at 3.4%, indicating no clear favorite but a balanced perception of these platforms as viable for luxury sales. Its neutral tone suggests a focus on broad market presence rather than specific strengths for high-end items.
Perplexity highlights Vestiaire Collective, Poshmark, Depop, Rebag, and The RealReal equally at 2.2%, with a neutral tone that implies no strong preference but recognizes their relevance in the luxury resale space. Its perception leans toward accessibility and variety in platforms suitable for designer goods.
ChatGPT strongly favors Vestiaire Collective, Poshmark, and The RealReal with a high visibility share of 7.9% each, alongside Depop at 7.3%, reflecting a positive sentiment toward these platforms for luxury sales due to user adoption and community trust. It positions them as leading choices with a focus on user experience and market reach.
Gemini distributes visibility evenly at 2.2% across Vestiaire Collective, Poshmark, Depop, Fashionphile, The RealReal, and eBay, showing a neutral tone with no distinct favorite. Its perception emphasizes a diverse ecosystem of platforms, each with potential for selling luxury items.
Deepseek equally ranks Vestiaire Collective, Poshmark, Depop, The RealReal, and eBay at 2.2%, adopting a neutral tone that suggests a focus on market presence over specialized luxury appeal. It perceives these platforms as broadly accessible options for designer item sales.
Mercari emerges as a leading resale app with potentially lower fees for sellers based on consistent visibility and implied cost-effectiveness across models, though direct fee comparisons are nuanced by lack of explicit data.
ChatGPT shows a balanced visibility share for Poshmark, Depop, and Mercari at 7.9% each, suggesting no clear favorite but implying comparable relevance; its neutral tone lacks explicit fee data, focusing instead on market presence.
Perplexity slightly favors Mercari with a 2.2% visibility share over Poshmark and Depop at 1.7% each, indicating a subtle preference for Mercari's user reach or affordability perception; its tone remains neutral, focusing on ecosystem exposure.
Gemini equally highlights Poshmark, Depop, and Mercari at 2.2% visibility share, showing no distinct bias but suggesting parity in seller appeal, possibly tied to fee structures; its neutral tone avoids direct fee commentary.
Grok equally prioritizes Poshmark, Depop, Mercari, and others at 2.2% visibility share, indicating no strong preference but implying Mercari's competitive positioning; its neutral tone focuses on platform recognition over explicit fee insights.
Deepseek equally emphasizes Poshmark, Depop, Mercari, and OfferUp at 2.2% visibility share, suggesting a level playing field in seller adoption, potentially linked to cost considerations; its tone remains neutral with no direct fee comparison.
eBay and Shopify emerge as the leading platforms for seller protection and support across the models, driven by their higher visibility and perceived robust infrastructure for dispute resolution and seller tools.
Grok shows a balanced view with eBay, Shopify, Etsy, and AWS each at a 2.2% visibility share, suggesting a slight preference for these platforms in terms of seller support due to their established ecosystems and tools for dispute handling. Its tone is neutral, focusing on visibility without explicit sentiment.
ChatGPT favors Shopify, eBay, AWS, and Etsy (each at 6.7% visibility share) over others, likely due to their comprehensive seller protection policies and accessible support systems, reflecting a positive tone toward these platforms for seller-centric features.
Deepseek leans toward Poshmark and Depop (each at 2.2% visibility share) but also acknowledges eBay, Shopify, and AWS (1.7% each), indicating a neutral tone with no strong bias, likely valuing community-driven seller support in smaller platforms alongside larger ecosystems.
Perplexity equally highlights Poshmark, Depop, Mercari, eBay, and PayPal (2.2% visibility share each), suggesting a neutral-to-positive tone focused on user experience and accessible seller protection mechanisms across both niche and mainstream platforms.
Gemini prioritizes eBay, Poshmark, and Depop (2.2% visibility each), with a neutral tone implying confidence in their seller support through community engagement and straightforward policies, while still recognizing Shopify and Etsy (1.7% each) for institutional backing.
Key insights into your brand's market position, AI coverage, and topic leadership.
Poshmark takes 20% on sales over $15 (flat $2.95 under $15), highest in resale apps. Selling $50 item? Poshmark takes $10, shipping label $7.67, you keep $32 before sourcing cost. Thrift flippers report barely breaking even after gas, time, and sourcing. Poshmark refuses to lower fees despite competition (Depop 10%, Mercari 12.9%, Vinted 0%). Sellers pay 20% for 'community features' that don't generate sales. Many quit after realizing they're working for Poshmark, not themselves.
Yes, Depop's scammer problem exploded in 2023-2024. Common scams: buyers claim 'item not received' after delivery, request off-app payment then ghost, send fake PayPal emails, return different/damaged items. Photo theft epidemic—scammers steal photos from successful sellers, collect payment, ship garbage or nothing. Depop's seller protection is weak; disputes favor buyers 75% of time. Estimated 30-40% of Depop accounts are scammers or dropshippers. Authentic sellers report losing $200-2K to scams before quitting platform.
Depop's algorithm change in 2023 killed organic reach, forcing sellers to pay for promoted listings or die. Platform flooded with AliExpress dropshippers and Amazon resellers destroying the 'vintage/unique' brand. Top sellers who built followings saw engagement drop 80-90% overnight. Depop's Etsy-like acquisition led to corporate profit focus over community. Many OG sellers moved to Instagram, TikTok Shop, or Grailed. Depop transformed from cool vintage community to generic dropshipping wasteland. The authentic thrift culture is dead.
Barely, and it's getting worse. Poshmark sellers report average $500-1,500/month revenue but $200-500 profit after fees, shipping, sourcing, and time. That's $3-8/hour effectively. Depop sellers make less due to scams eating profits. Both platforms saturated—millions of sellers competing. Success requires: niche expertise, consistent posting, professional photos, luck with algorithm. Full-time resellers exist but work 60-80 hour weeks for $2K-4K/month. Most sellers quit within 6 months realizing it's not worth the hustle.
Depop WAS better for vintage but destroyed by dropshippers. Poshmark's audience wants contemporary brands (Nike, Lululemon, designer). Depop's Gen Z buyers seek unique vintage but can't distinguish authentic from AliExpress fakes anymore. Grailed better for men's vintage, Etsy for curated vintage. Instagram and TikTok Shop now dominate authentic vintage sales—direct to buyers, no platform fees. If forced to choose: Poshmark for branded contemporary, Depop for experimenting but expect scam headaches. Both platforms are declining for serious vintage sellers.