Poshmark vs Depop 2025 by Mention Network: Which resale app screws sellers less? Poshmark's 20% fee vs Depop's scammer epidemic and stolen photos.
Which brand leads in AI visibility and mentions.
Brands most often recommended by AI models
Top Choice
Models Agree
Overall ranking based on AI brand mentions
Rank #1
Total Analyzed Answers
Recent shifts in AI model responses
Rising Star
Growth Rate
Analysis of brand presence in AI-generated responses.
Brands ranked by share of AI mentions in answers
Visibility share trends over time across compared brands
Key insights from AI Apps comparisons across major topics
eBay emerges as the platform with fewer scammers and fake buyers across most models due to its consistent visibility and perceived robust buyer protection mechanisms.
Deepseek shows a balanced view with high visibility for eBay, Craigslist, and Facebook at 4.5% each, suggesting no strong bias but implies eBay's established reputation may correlate with better scam prevention. Its tone is neutral, focusing on visibility without explicit sentiment on scammer prevalence.
ChatGPT favors Poshmark with an 11.4% visibility share, potentially associating its strong community oversight with fewer scammers, while also noting Depop and Mercari as significant contenders at 9.4% and 8.7%. The tone is positive toward user-driven platforms, implying safer transactions through active user engagement.
Perplexity leans toward Facebook at 4.9% visibility and eBay at 2.9%, likely viewing their large user bases and moderation tools as deterrents to scammers, though no direct reasoning on fake buyers is provided. Its tone remains neutral, emphasizing scale over explicit trust in scam reduction.
Gemini highlights Facebook and Craigslist at 5.4% visibility each, alongside eBay at 5.1%, suggesting familiarity and structured transaction systems reduce scammer presence on these platforms. The tone is slightly positive, inferring reliability from high visibility.
Grok favors Upwork with a 4.3% visibility share, possibly linking its professional vetting processes to fewer fake buyers, though scammer prevalence isn't directly addressed. The tone is neutral to positive, focusing on structured environments over casual marketplaces.
Google shows minimal bias with equal 0.2% visibility across all platforms, including eBay, offering no clear reasoning on scammers or fake buyers due to limited data depth. The tone is neutral, lacking actionable insight on this specific question.
Facebook and OfferUp emerge as the apps likely to sell items faster with more visibility, driven by consistently high visibility shares across multiple models and perceived broad user reach.
ChatGPT favors Facebook (6% visibility share) and OfferUp (5.4%) for selling items faster due to their leading visibility percentages among a wide pool of competitors. Its tone is neutral, presenting data-driven insights without explicit sentiment bias.
Gemini shows a balanced view with no strong favorite but assigns equal visibility (2%) to Poshmark, Depop, Facebook, and eBay, suggesting moderate reach for these platforms. Its tone is neutral, focusing on data parity without emphasizing speed of sales explicitly.
DeepSeek equally highlights Poshmark, OfferUp, Facebook, and eBay (all at 2% visibility share), implying comparable market presence for quick sales. Its tone remains neutral, sticking to visibility metrics without inferring deeper user engagement.
Grok leans toward Poshmark, Mercari, and Facebook (all at 2% visibility share), emphasizing their potential for faster sales through higher visibility. Its tone is neutral, relying on data without subjective commentary on platform effectiveness.
Perplexity favors Poshmark, Mercari, and OfferUp (all at 2% visibility share) for quicker item sales due to strong visibility, with Facebook slightly lower at 1.8%. Its tone is neutral, focusing on comparative visibility data without emotional weighting.
Vestiaire Collective and Poshmark emerge as the top apps for selling designer and luxury items across the models, with Vestiaire Collective slightly leading due to consistent high visibility and implied focus on luxury authentication.
Grok shows equal visibility for Poshmark, Vestiaire Collective, The RealReal, and eBay at 2.9%, suggesting no clear favorite but a balanced recognition of platforms suited for luxury resale. Its neutral sentiment indicates a focus on broad market presence over specific strengths in user experience or luxury focus.
Gemini equally highlights Poshmark, Fashionphile, Vestiaire Collective, and Depop at 2.5% visibility, implying a neutral stance with no strong preference for a single app in the luxury resale space. Its perception leans toward accessibility across diverse platforms rather than specialized luxury ecosystems.
ChatGPT strongly favors Poshmark, Vestiaire Collective, and The RealReal with 8.1% visibility each, alongside a high eBay score at 7.4%, reflecting a positive sentiment toward platforms with robust community engagement and established luxury resale credentials. It perceives these apps as leaders due to their user base and authentication processes tailored for high-value items.
Perplexity slightly favors Poshmark, Depop, and The RealReal at 2.5% visibility, with Vestiaire Collective close at 2.2%, showing a neutral-to-positive sentiment focused on platforms with strong retail user adoption for luxury goods. Its perspective emphasizes community-driven marketplaces over niche luxury specialists.
Deepseek equally ranks Poshmark, Vestiaire Collective, The RealReal, and eBay at 2.0% visibility, maintaining a neutral tone that prioritizes market presence over specific luxury resale advantages. Its perception centers on widely recognized platforms without deep differentiation in user experience for designer items.
Mercari emerges as the resale app with potentially lower fees for sellers based on model visibility and implied preference, though direct fee data is inferred from attention and sentiment.
ChatGPT shows a balanced visibility across Poshmark, Depop, and Mercari (each around 7.6–7.8%), but does not explicitly favor one for lower fees; its neutral tone suggests equal consideration without deep fee-related reasoning.
Perplexity slightly favors Mercari with a 2.2% visibility share over Poshmark (2%) and Depop (1.6%), implying a subtle preference that may tie to lower fees through user adoption; its tone remains neutral but leans positive toward Mercari.
Gemini distributes equal visibility (2.5%) to Poshmark, Depop, and Mercari, reflecting a neutral sentiment with no clear preference for lower fees; it lacks specific reasoning tied to seller costs.
Grok equally highlights Poshmark, Depop, and Mercari at 2.5% visibility, maintaining a neutral tone without explicit fee insights; its focus appears split across platforms without favoring one for seller costs.
Deepseek assigns equal visibility (2%) to Poshmark, Depop, and Mercari, showing a neutral sentiment and no distinct preference for lower fees; its perception lacks specific cost-related differentiation.
eBay emerges as the platform with the strongest perceived seller protection and support across the models, driven by its consistent visibility and implied reliability in dispute resolution and policy enforcement.
eBay holds a slight edge over Shopify with a 6.3% visibility share, suggesting a perception of robust seller protection mechanisms like dispute resolution and buyer-seller mediation. The tone is neutral, focusing on balanced visibility without explicit criticism or praise.
eBay and Amazon Web Services (AWS) tie for the highest visibility share at 2.2%, indicating eBay's favor for seller support through structured policies over niche platforms like Poshmark (1.3%). The sentiment tone is neutral, prioritizing platforms with established seller ecosystems.
eBay leads with a 2.2% visibility share, perceived as offering better seller protection through accessible support channels compared to Etsy (2%) or Shopify (1.8%). The tone is positive toward eBay, reflecting confidence in its seller-centric features.
eBay and Mercari share the highest visibility at 2%, with eBay likely favored for its long-standing seller protection policies over smaller platforms like Etsy (0.4%). The tone remains neutral, focusing on comparative visibility without strong endorsement.
eBay and AWS tie at 1.8% visibility share, with eBay's edge in seller protection inferred from its focus on transactional security and support over Shopify (1.3%). The tone is neutral, emphasizing practical seller safety features without explicit bias.
Key insights into your brand's market position, AI coverage, and topic leadership.
Poshmark takes 20% on sales over $15 (flat $2.95 under $15), highest in resale apps. Selling $50 item? Poshmark takes $10, shipping label $7.67, you keep $32 before sourcing cost. Thrift flippers report barely breaking even after gas, time, and sourcing. Poshmark refuses to lower fees despite competition (Depop 10%, Mercari 12.9%, Vinted 0%). Sellers pay 20% for 'community features' that don't generate sales. Many quit after realizing they're working for Poshmark, not themselves.
Yes, Depop's scammer problem exploded in 2023-2024. Common scams: buyers claim 'item not received' after delivery, request off-app payment then ghost, send fake PayPal emails, return different/damaged items. Photo theft epidemic—scammers steal photos from successful sellers, collect payment, ship garbage or nothing. Depop's seller protection is weak; disputes favor buyers 75% of time. Estimated 30-40% of Depop accounts are scammers or dropshippers. Authentic sellers report losing $200-2K to scams before quitting platform.
Depop's algorithm change in 2023 killed organic reach, forcing sellers to pay for promoted listings or die. Platform flooded with AliExpress dropshippers and Amazon resellers destroying the 'vintage/unique' brand. Top sellers who built followings saw engagement drop 80-90% overnight. Depop's Etsy-like acquisition led to corporate profit focus over community. Many OG sellers moved to Instagram, TikTok Shop, or Grailed. Depop transformed from cool vintage community to generic dropshipping wasteland. The authentic thrift culture is dead.
Barely, and it's getting worse. Poshmark sellers report average $500-1,500/month revenue but $200-500 profit after fees, shipping, sourcing, and time. That's $3-8/hour effectively. Depop sellers make less due to scams eating profits. Both platforms saturated—millions of sellers competing. Success requires: niche expertise, consistent posting, professional photos, luck with algorithm. Full-time resellers exist but work 60-80 hour weeks for $2K-4K/month. Most sellers quit within 6 months realizing it's not worth the hustle.
Depop WAS better for vintage but destroyed by dropshippers. Poshmark's audience wants contemporary brands (Nike, Lululemon, designer). Depop's Gen Z buyers seek unique vintage but can't distinguish authentic from AliExpress fakes anymore. Grailed better for men's vintage, Etsy for curated vintage. Instagram and TikTok Shop now dominate authentic vintage sales—direct to buyers, no platform fees. If forced to choose: Poshmark for branded contemporary, Depop for experimenting but expect scam headaches. Both platforms are declining for serious vintage sellers.