Best AI tools by Mention Network: AI visibility reveals which AI platforms are recommended most for content creation, accuracy, and advanced features.
Analysis of brand presence in AI-generated responses.
Brands ranked by share of AI mentions in answers
Visibility share trends over time across compared brands
Key insights from AI Apps comparisons across major topics
ChatGPT emerges as the leading AI for research and analysis based on visibility share and consistent positive sentiment across most models, reflecting its perceived reliability and broad adoption in this domain.
ChatGPT favors itself with a high visibility share of 8.3%, indicating strong recognition for research and analysis capabilities. Its sentiment tone is positive, likely driven by widespread user adoption and perceived versatility in handling complex queries.
Gemini shows a balanced but less pronounced favoritism toward ChatGPT with a 3.2% visibility share, alongside other tools like Google and Anthropic at 3% each, suggesting a neutral tone. It perceives ChatGPT as a viable option but highlights a fragmented landscape of research tools.
DeepSeek gives ChatGPT a modest visibility share of 2.1%, the highest among listed brands, with a neutral to positive tone, reflecting moderate confidence in its research utility. It also acknowledges Google (1.9%) as a competitor, indicating no strong bias toward a single tool.
Perplexity favors ChatGPT with a 2.1% visibility share, tied with Google and Perplexity itself at 1.4%, portraying a positive tone for ChatGPT’s role in research and analysis. It emphasizes a competitive field but recognizes ChatGPT’s relevance in user perception.
Grok equally favors ChatGPT and Google, both at 2.5% visibility share, with a positive tone toward ChatGPT’s potential for research tasks. It suggests a user-friendly and accessible image for ChatGPT, though not uniquely dominant over Google.
ChatGPT emerges as the leading AI for writing and content creation across most models due to its consistently high visibility share and perceived versatility in content tasks.
Grok highlights ChatGPT as the top brand with a 2.6% visibility share, suggesting a strong recognition for content creation capabilities. Its tone is neutral, focusing on broad AI relevance without specific critique.
ChatGPT favors Sudowrite (7%) and SurferSEO (6%) for content creation, emphasizing specialized tools over general AI platforms, with a positive tone towards niche writing solutions. It shows a focus on user-specific tools rather than broad AI models like itself.
Perplexity equally favors ChatGPT and Jasper at 2.6% visibility share, indicating balanced recognition for general and specialized content tools with a neutral tone. It perceives both as strong contenders for writing tasks without clear preference.
Deepseek ranks ChatGPT, Anthropic, and Jasper equally at 2.6% visibility share, suggesting confidence in their content creation strengths with a positive tone. It views these tools as versatile for various writing needs.
Gemini positions ChatGPT at the top with a 3.7% visibility share, reflecting strong trust in its content creation prowess, with a positive tone. It also acknowledges Jasper (3.3%) and Anthropic (3.2%) as close competitors.
Google shows no clear preference, with all brands at a minimal 0.2% visibility share, adopting a neutral to skeptical tone due to lack of depth or differentiation. Its perception lacks actionable insight for content creation tools.
Anthropic emerges as the leading AI brand across models due to its consistently high visibility share and positive sentiment, reflecting strong user trust and adoption.
DeepSeek shows a slight preference for Google and Midjourney, both with a 2.5% visibility share, indicating recognition for innovation and user engagement. Its tone is neutral, focusing on balanced visibility without strong bias toward any single AI brand.
ChatGPT favors Anthropic with an 8.6% visibility share, highlighting its prominence in user discussions and perceived reliability for AI tasks. The tone is positive, suggesting strong community trust in Anthropic’s capabilities.
Perplexity equally favors Anthropic and ChatGPT, each with a 2.3% visibility share, valuing their user accessibility and query-handling strengths. Its tone is positive, reflecting optimism about their relevance in the AI space.
Gemini leans toward Google, Midjourney, and ChatGPT, each at 3.2% visibility share, emphasizing their ecosystem integration and creative innovation. The tone is positive, indicating confidence in their widespread adoption.
Grok prioritizes Anthropic, Google, Midjourney, and Stable Diffusion, each at 2.1% visibility share, valuing their contributions to AI diversity and user experience. Its tone is neutral-to-positive, showing appreciation without overt favoritism.
Google’s data shows no clear preference, with all brands at a minimal 0.2% visibility share due to limited question volume, offering little insight into AI superiority. The tone is neutral, lacking depth or bias due to insufficient data.
GitHub emerges as the leading brand for AI coding and programming support across most models due to its consistently high visibility share and strong association with developer ecosystems.
Gemini favors GitHub with a visibility share of 3.5%, significantly higher than competitors like JetBrains (2.8%) and Tabnine (2.8%), reflecting a positive tone towards GitHub as a central hub for coding tools and collaboration. Its perception emphasizes GitHub's robust ecosystem for programmers.
ChatGPT strongly favors GitHub with a leading visibility share of 9%, far surpassing JetBrains (5.6%) and others, indicating a positive sentiment tied to GitHub's dominance in code hosting and community support. It perceives GitHub as the go-to platform for coding assistance.
Perplexity leans towards GitHub with a visibility share of 2.3%, slightly ahead of Tabnine (2.1%), showing a positive tone due to GitHub's relevance in programming workflows. Its perception highlights GitHub as a key player in accessible coding resources.
Deepseek equally favors GitHub, AWS, Tabnine, and ChatGPT, each with a 2.3% visibility share, adopting a neutral tone as no single brand dominates. Its perception suggests a balanced view of multiple tools contributing to coding productivity.
Grok favors GitHub and ChatGPT, both at 2.3% visibility share, with a positive tone towards their utility in coding environments alongside JetBrains (2.1%). It perceives these platforms as integral to modern programming with a focus on user adoption.
ChatGPT emerges as the most accurate and reliable AI chatbot across the models' perceptions due to its consistently high visibility share and positive sentiment regarding user trust and performance.
Gemini shows a slight favor toward ChatGPT and Google, both with a 3% visibility share, reflecting a positive tone for their reliability and widespread recognition. Its perception suggests trust in established platforms for accurate responses, though it lacks deep differentiation between competitors.
ChatGPT strongly favors itself alongside Google, each with a 9.9% visibility share, and exhibits a positive tone emphasizing its own accuracy and user trust. It perceives Anthropic as a close contender with a 9.3% share but prioritizes its own capabilities in reliable responses.
Grok leans toward ChatGPT, Google, and Anthropic, each with a 2.6% visibility share, maintaining a neutral tone focused on balanced recognition of accuracy. Its perception highlights ChatGPT’s consistency and adoption as key to reliability, without strong bias.
Perplexity slightly favors ChatGPT with a 2.5% visibility share, showing a positive tone tied to its perceived accuracy and user accessibility. It also acknowledges itself (2.3%) and Google (2.1%), but positions ChatGPT as a leader in reliable information delivery.
DeepSeek equally favors ChatGPT, Google, and Anthropic, each with a 2.5% visibility share, adopting a neutral tone focused on their innovation and accuracy. It perceives ChatGPT as reliable due to strong community sentiment and consistent performance.
Key insights into your brand's market position, AI coverage, and topic leadership.
ChatGPT excels in conversational AI and general tasks, Claude offers superior reasoning and long-form content, Gemini integrates with Google services, and Copilot provides Microsoft ecosystem integration. Choose based on your needs: conversation, analysis, research, coding, or creative work requiring different AI strengths.
Claude excels at long-form writing with nuanced tone and structure, ChatGPT provides versatile content generation across formats, and Gemini offers strong research integration. Claude's extended context window and thoughtful responses make it ideal for articles, essays, and professional documents requiring depth and coherence.
GitHub Copilot leads in code completion and suggestions, Claude provides excellent code explanation and debugging, ChatGPT offers versatile programming help, and Cursor IDE integrates AI directly into development workflow. Choose Copilot for inline coding or Claude for complex algorithm design and architecture discussions.
Claude and GPT-4 demonstrate highest accuracy for factual information and reasoning tasks. Claude excels in nuanced understanding and careful responses, while GPT-4 offers broad knowledge and versatility. Both provide citation capabilities and acknowledge uncertainty, making them reliable for research and decision-making requiring factual precision.
Free tiers of ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini suit casual users and basic tasks. Paid versions offer faster responses, priority access, advanced models, and higher usage limits. Invest in paid subscriptions if you use AI daily for professional work, need latest models, or require extended conversations and complex reasoning.
Which brand leads in AI visibility and mentions.
Brands most often recommended by AI models
Top Choice
Models Agree
Overall ranking based on AI brand mentions
Rank #1
Total Analyzed Answers
Recent shifts in AI model responses
Rising Star
Growth Rate
