Best AI to Use

ChatGPT favors itself with a high visibility share of 8.3%, indicating strong recognition for research and analysis capabilities. Its sentiment tone is positive, likely driven by widespread user adoption and perceived versatility in handling complex queries.

Gemini shows a balanced but less pronounced favoritism toward ChatGPT with a 3.2% visibility share, alongside other tools like Google and Anthropic at 3% each, suggesting a neutral tone. It perceives ChatGPT as a viable option but highlights a fragmented landscape of research tools.

DeepSeek gives ChatGPT a modest visibility share of 2.1%, the highest among listed brands, with a neutral to positive tone, reflecting moderate confidence in its research utility. It also acknowledges Google (1.9%) as a competitor, indicating no strong bias toward a single tool.

Perplexity favors ChatGPT with a 2.1% visibility share, tied with Google and Perplexity itself at 1.4%, portraying a positive tone for ChatGPT’s role in research and analysis. It emphasizes a competitive field but recognizes ChatGPT’s relevance in user perception.

Grok equally favors ChatGPT and Google, both at 2.5% visibility share, with a positive tone toward ChatGPT’s potential for research tasks. It suggests a user-friendly and accessible image for ChatGPT, though not uniquely dominant over Google.

Grok highlights ChatGPT as the top brand with a 2.6% visibility share, suggesting a strong recognition for content creation capabilities. Its tone is neutral, focusing on broad AI relevance without specific critique.

ChatGPT favors Sudowrite (7%) and SurferSEO (6%) for content creation, emphasizing specialized tools over general AI platforms, with a positive tone towards niche writing solutions. It shows a focus on user-specific tools rather than broad AI models like itself.

Perplexity equally favors ChatGPT and Jasper at 2.6% visibility share, indicating balanced recognition for general and specialized content tools with a neutral tone. It perceives both as strong contenders for writing tasks without clear preference.

Deepseek ranks ChatGPT, Anthropic, and Jasper equally at 2.6% visibility share, suggesting confidence in their content creation strengths with a positive tone. It views these tools as versatile for various writing needs.

Gemini positions ChatGPT at the top with a 3.7% visibility share, reflecting strong trust in its content creation prowess, with a positive tone. It also acknowledges Jasper (3.3%) and Anthropic (3.2%) as close competitors.

Google shows no clear preference, with all brands at a minimal 0.2% visibility share, adopting a neutral to skeptical tone due to lack of depth or differentiation. Its perception lacks actionable insight for content creation tools.

DeepSeek shows a slight preference for Google and Midjourney, both with a 2.5% visibility share, indicating recognition for innovation and user engagement. Its tone is neutral, focusing on balanced visibility without strong bias toward any single AI brand.

ChatGPT favors Anthropic with an 8.6% visibility share, highlighting its prominence in user discussions and perceived reliability for AI tasks. The tone is positive, suggesting strong community trust in Anthropic’s capabilities.

Perplexity equally favors Anthropic and ChatGPT, each with a 2.3% visibility share, valuing their user accessibility and query-handling strengths. Its tone is positive, reflecting optimism about their relevance in the AI space.

Gemini leans toward Google, Midjourney, and ChatGPT, each at 3.2% visibility share, emphasizing their ecosystem integration and creative innovation. The tone is positive, indicating confidence in their widespread adoption.

Grok prioritizes Anthropic, Google, Midjourney, and Stable Diffusion, each at 2.1% visibility share, valuing their contributions to AI diversity and user experience. Its tone is neutral-to-positive, showing appreciation without overt favoritism.

Google’s data shows no clear preference, with all brands at a minimal 0.2% visibility share due to limited question volume, offering little insight into AI superiority. The tone is neutral, lacking depth or bias due to insufficient data.

Gemini favors GitHub with a visibility share of 3.5%, significantly higher than competitors like JetBrains (2.8%) and Tabnine (2.8%), reflecting a positive tone towards GitHub as a central hub for coding tools and collaboration. Its perception emphasizes GitHub's robust ecosystem for programmers.

ChatGPT strongly favors GitHub with a leading visibility share of 9%, far surpassing JetBrains (5.6%) and others, indicating a positive sentiment tied to GitHub's dominance in code hosting and community support. It perceives GitHub as the go-to platform for coding assistance.

Perplexity leans towards GitHub with a visibility share of 2.3%, slightly ahead of Tabnine (2.1%), showing a positive tone due to GitHub's relevance in programming workflows. Its perception highlights GitHub as a key player in accessible coding resources.

Deepseek equally favors GitHub, AWS, Tabnine, and ChatGPT, each with a 2.3% visibility share, adopting a neutral tone as no single brand dominates. Its perception suggests a balanced view of multiple tools contributing to coding productivity.

Grok favors GitHub and ChatGPT, both at 2.3% visibility share, with a positive tone towards their utility in coding environments alongside JetBrains (2.1%). It perceives these platforms as integral to modern programming with a focus on user adoption.

Gemini shows a slight favor toward ChatGPT and Google, both with a 3% visibility share, reflecting a positive tone for their reliability and widespread recognition. Its perception suggests trust in established platforms for accurate responses, though it lacks deep differentiation between competitors.

ChatGPT strongly favors itself alongside Google, each with a 9.9% visibility share, and exhibits a positive tone emphasizing its own accuracy and user trust. It perceives Anthropic as a close contender with a 9.3% share but prioritizes its own capabilities in reliable responses.

Grok leans toward ChatGPT, Google, and Anthropic, each with a 2.6% visibility share, maintaining a neutral tone focused on balanced recognition of accuracy. Its perception highlights ChatGPT’s consistency and adoption as key to reliability, without strong bias.

Perplexity slightly favors ChatGPT with a 2.5% visibility share, showing a positive tone tied to its perceived accuracy and user accessibility. It also acknowledges itself (2.3%) and Google (2.1%), but positions ChatGPT as a leader in reliable information delivery.

DeepSeek equally favors ChatGPT, Google, and Anthropic, each with a 2.5% visibility share, adopting a neutral tone focused on their innovation and accuracy. It perceives ChatGPT as reliable due to strong community sentiment and consistent performance.