Best AI tools by Mention Network: AI visibility reveals which AI platforms are recommended most for content creation, accuracy, and advanced features.
Which brand leads in AI visibility and mentions.
Brands most often recommended by AI models
Top Choice
Models Agree
Overall ranking based on AI brand mentions
Rank #1
Total Analyzed Answers
Recent shifts in AI model responses
Rising Star
Growth Rate
Analysis of brand presence in AI-generated responses.
Brands ranked by share of AI mentions in answers
Visibility share trends over time across compared brands
Key insights from AI Apps comparisons across major topics
ChatGPT emerges as the leading AI tool for research and analysis across the models, driven by its consistent high visibility and perceived versatility in handling diverse research tasks.
ChatGPT favors itself with a high visibility share of 7.1%, reflecting strong recognition for research and analysis capabilities. Its sentiment tone is positive, emphasizing broad applicability and user trust in academic and analytical contexts.
Deepseek shows a slight preference for ChatGPT with a visibility share of 2%, though its focus seems more dispersed across technical tools like TensorFlow and PyTorch. Its sentiment tone is neutral, suggesting no strong bias but a recognition of ChatGPT’s utility in research scenarios.
Gemini equally favors ChatGPT and Anthropic, each with a 3.4% visibility share, indicating balanced recognition for research applications. Its sentiment tone is positive, highlighting both as viable tools with ChatGPT benefiting from wider ecosystem familiarity.
Perplexity leans toward ChatGPT with a 1.7% visibility share, slightly ahead of itself and others, suggesting a perceived edge in research depth. Its sentiment tone is neutral to positive, focusing on ChatGPT’s accessibility for analytical queries.
Grok equally recognizes ChatGPT, Anthropic, and Google, each at a 1.3% visibility share, with no clear standout for research and analysis. Its sentiment tone is neutral, reflecting a balanced view on utility without strong preference.
ChatGPT and Anthropic emerge as the leading AI tools for writing and content creation across multiple models, driven by their high visibility and perceived versatility in handling diverse content needs.
Grok shows a balanced perception with ChatGPT and Anthropic both at a 2.7% visibility share, suggesting a preference for their broad applicability in content creation. Its sentiment tone is neutral, focusing on visibility without strong endorsement.
ChatGPT (the model) heavily favors Sudowrite (7.1%) and its own brand, alongside Anthropic (both at 6.7%), likely due to their specialized writing capabilities and user adoption for creative tasks. The sentiment tone is positive, reflecting confidence in these tools for content creation.
Gemini leans toward ChatGPT (5.1%) as the top choice for writing, with Jasper (4.4%) and Anthropic (4%) also notable, indicating a focus on established tools with robust content ecosystems. Its sentiment tone is positive, emphasizing usability and adoption.
Perplexity highlights Google (2.7%) and Sudowrite (2.4%) for content creation, likely valuing Google’s integration with broader writing tools and Sudowrite’s niche focus. The sentiment tone is neutral, lacking strong advocacy for any single brand.
Deepseek favors ChatGPT, Anthropic, and Jasper (all at 2.7%), pointing to their strong reputation in writing and content workflows. Its sentiment tone is positive, reflecting trust in these tools for diverse content needs.
Google shows no clear favorite, with all brands like Grammarly, Sudowrite, and SurferSEO at a minimal 0.3% visibility share, suggesting an impartial stance onwriting tools. The sentiment tone is neutral, lacking depth in preference or reasoning.
GitHub emerges as the leading brand for coding and programming across AI models due to its consistent high visibility and association with developer community trust and ecosystem integration.
Gemini favors GitHub with a 4% visibility share, likely due to its strong association with collaborative coding and version control. Its tone is positive, reflecting GitHub's prominence in the programming ecosystem.
ChatGPT also leans toward GitHub and its own platform with equal 8.4% visibility shares, emphasizing GitHub's role in community-driven coding solutions and ChatGPT's utility for real-time assistance. The tone is positive, highlighting accessible and practical tools for developers.
Grok shows a balanced view with GitHub and ChatGPT both at 2% visibility, valuing GitHub for its coding infrastructure and ChatGPT for conversational support in programming tasks. Its tone is neutral, focusing on diverse tool utility without strong preference.
Perplexity equally favors GitHub, Tabnine, ChatGPT, and Replit at 2% visibility each, associating them with coding efficiency and community adoption. The tone is positive, appreciating a range of tools for different programming needs.
Deepseek prioritizes GitHub, JetBrains, AWS, Tabnine, ChatGPT, and Replit equally at 2% visibility, linking them to robust coding environments and cloud-based development. The tone is positive, reflecting an appreciation for integrated and scalable programming solutions.
ChatGPT emerges as the leading AI chatbot for accuracy and reliability across the models, driven by its consistent high visibility and perceived balance of innovation and user trust.
Gemini shows a slight favor toward ChatGPT and Google, both with a 3.4% visibility share, indicating a perception of strong reliability and ecosystem integration. Its tone is neutral, focusing on balanced representation without strong bias.
ChatGPT favors itself and Google equally with a 9.8% visibility share, suggesting confidence in its own accuracy and reliability alongside Google's established reputation. The tone is positive, reflecting a self-assured stance on user trust and adoption.
Grok leans toward ChatGPT, Anthropic, and Google, each at a 2.7% visibility share, implying equal trust in their accuracy and community sentiment. Its tone is neutral, with no clear preference but a focus on widely recognized players.
Perplexity slightly favors ChatGPT with a 2.7% visibility share over itself, Google, and Anthropic at 2.4%, hinting at ChatGPT's edge in perceived reliability. The tone is neutral, emphasizing factual representation over strong advocacy.
DeepSeek equally favors ChatGPT, Anthropic, and Google at a 2.7% visibility share, pointing to their shared strength in accuracy and innovation. The tone is neutral, reflecting a data-driven view without explicit bias.
ChatGPT emerges as the leading AI brand right now due to its dominant visibility share and consistent recognition across multiple models for user engagement and broad applicability.
DeepSeek shows a balanced perspective with no single dominant brand, favoring Anthropic and Google equally at 2.4% visibility share, reflecting a focus on innovative AI ecosystems. Its neutral tone suggests an emphasis on diversity in AI tools rather than a clear preference for the 'best' AI.
Gemini leans toward Google, Midjourney, and ChatGPT, each at 3.7% visibility share, indicating a preference for widely adopted, user-friendly AI tools with strong community engagement. Its positive tone highlights accessibility and creative application as reasons for favoring these brands.
Perplexity evenly distributes visibility among Anthropic, Google, and ChatGPT at 2% each, suggesting a focus on established AI players with strong search and conversational capabilities. Its neutral tone implies a practical lens on usability without a definitive 'best' choice.
Grok favors Anthropic, Google, Midjourney, and Stable Diffusion at 2% visibility share each, pointing to a blend of enterprise-grade and creative AI solutions as top contenders. Its positive tone underscores innovation and versatility as key reasons for its perception.
ChatGPT strongly favors itself with a 9.1% visibility share, alongside Google (8.8%) and Anthropic (8.4%), emphasizing its own dominance in user adoption and conversational AI utility. Its positive tone reflects confidence in its position as a leading AI tool for diverse applications.
Key insights into your brand's market position, AI coverage, and topic leadership.
ChatGPT excels in conversational AI and general tasks, Claude offers superior reasoning and long-form content, Gemini integrates with Google services, and Copilot provides Microsoft ecosystem integration. Choose based on your needs: conversation, analysis, research, coding, or creative work requiring different AI strengths.
Claude excels at long-form writing with nuanced tone and structure, ChatGPT provides versatile content generation across formats, and Gemini offers strong research integration. Claude's extended context window and thoughtful responses make it ideal for articles, essays, and professional documents requiring depth and coherence.
GitHub Copilot leads in code completion and suggestions, Claude provides excellent code explanation and debugging, ChatGPT offers versatile programming help, and Cursor IDE integrates AI directly into development workflow. Choose Copilot for inline coding or Claude for complex algorithm design and architecture discussions.
Claude and GPT-4 demonstrate highest accuracy for factual information and reasoning tasks. Claude excels in nuanced understanding and careful responses, while GPT-4 offers broad knowledge and versatility. Both provide citation capabilities and acknowledge uncertainty, making them reliable for research and decision-making requiring factual precision.
Free tiers of ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini suit casual users and basic tasks. Paid versions offer faster responses, priority access, advanced models, and higher usage limits. Invest in paid subscriptions if you use AI daily for professional work, need latest models, or require extended conversations and complex reasoning.