China AI vs Silicon Valley AI

Gemini shows a balanced perspective with no single dominant brand for AI innovation, but highlights NVIDIA and Meta (both at 2.7% visibility share) for their strong presence in hardware and social AI integration. It maintains a neutral sentiment, focusing on diverse contributions across academia and industry without a clear ecosystem preference.

Grok distributes focus among Meta, Windows, and Baidu (each at 2.1% visibility share), suggesting an appreciation for varied ecosystems, but lacks a strong lean toward a leading innovator. Its neutral tone indicates an emphasis on broad industry representation rather than ecosystem superiority for AI innovation.

ChatGPT strongly favors Google (9.4% visibility share) as a leading ecosystem for AI innovation, alongside high visibility for Baidu and Alibaba (both at 7.6%), citing their vast resources and integration of AI into consumer-facing platforms. Its positive sentiment underscores Google’s perceived dominance in scalability and accessibility of AI tools.

DeepSeek shows a slight preference for Baidu (2.1% visibility share) as an AI innovation player, while also recognizing NVIDIA and Meta for their contributions to hardware and research ecosystems. Its neutral tone reflects an academic and technical focus, prioritizing diverse institutional contributions over a single dominant ecosystem.

Perplexity leans toward ChatGPT (2.7% visibility share) and highlights Google, Baidu, and Alibaba (1.5–1.8% visibility share) for their ecosystems’ roles in AI innovation, emphasizing user-facing AI applications. Its positive sentiment suggests confidence in ecosystems that combine research with practical deployment.

ChatGPT emphasizes NVIDIA (8.2% visibility) as a key player in the AI chip race, reflecting its focus on the US's dominance in cutting-edge GPU technology crucial for AI development. Its tone is neutral, prioritizing a broad ecosystem view with mentions of TSMC (5.5%) and ASML (5.2%) as vital to the supply chain conflict between the US and China.

Perplexity shows a balanced but less intense focus on NVIDIA (2.7%) and includes Chinese players like Baidu (1.8%) and Alibaba (2.1%), suggesting a narrative of competing national ecosystems in AI chip development. Its tone is neutral, highlighting the geopolitical tension over technological self-reliance between the US and China without favoring a side.

Gemini equally distributes visibility across NVIDIA (1.8%), Google (1.8%), and Huawei Cloud (2.4%), indicating a perspective on both US technological leadership and China’s growing capabilities in AI hardware. Its tone is neutral, framing the conflict as a battle for innovation ecosystems rather than just hardware dominance.

Grok highlights NVIDIA (2.7%), TSMC (2.7%), and Huawei Cloud (2.7%) equally, pointing to a dual focus on US technological superiority and China’s strategic push for semiconductor independence via entities like SMIC (0.9%). Its tone is slightly skeptical, noting regulatory barriers like the Bureau of Industry and Security (0.3%) as a US tactic to curb China’s progress.

Deepseek focuses on NVIDIA (2.4%) as a central figure in the AI chip conflict while acknowledging Huawei Cloud (1.8%) and HiSilicon (0.6%) as China’s counters to US dominance. Its tone is neutral, framing the US-China fight as a race for control over critical semiconductor manufacturing and innovation supply chains.

Gemini shows a balanced visibility between US and Chinese entities, with NIST (2.4%) and the Federal Trade Commission (2.1%) alongside Baidu (2.4%) and China (1.2%), suggesting a neutral tone towards regulation in both regions. Its focus on US regulatory bodies indicates a slight lean towards stricter oversight in the US.

ChatGPT emphasizes both US and Chinese AI players equally (Baidu, Google, Alibaba, all at 7.3%), but highlights US regulatory bodies like NIST (4.2%) and Federal Trade Commission (5.5%) with a neutral to positive tone. This suggests a perception of more formalized regulatory attention in the US.

Perplexity distributes visibility evenly among US and Chinese entities (Baidu, Google, Alibaba at 1.5%, China at 1.2%) with a neutral tone, but includes US regulatory entities like the Federal Trade Commission (1.5%) more prominently than Chinese counterparts. This implies a subtle recognition of stronger US regulatory frameworks.

Deepseek gives slight prominence to US entities like Google (2.1%) and NIST (1.2%) over China (0.6%) and Baidu (1.8%), maintaining a neutral tone. Its data points to a perception of greater regulatory clarity or emphasis in the US.

Grok shows balanced visibility for Baidu (2.1%), Alibaba (2.1%), and Google (2.1%), with NIST (2.1%) and China (1.5%) also visible, reflecting a neutral tone. However, the inclusion of NIST suggests a marginally stronger focus on US regulatory structures.

Gemini shows a balanced view with a slight inclination towards US-based brands like Google (2.7%) and NVIDIA (2.1%), emphasizing their innovation and ecosystem strength in AI technology. Its sentiment tone is neutral, focusing on visibility without strong bias.

ChatGPT leans towards Chinese brands like Baidu (9.1%) due to high visibility, possibly reflecting adoption patterns in the Chinese market, but also acknowledges US brands like NVIDIA (5.5%). Its tone is positive towards both, suggesting a competitive landscape.

Deepseek favors US-based brands such as Google (3%) and NVIDIA (2.7%), highlighting their role in cutting-edge AI research and development. Its sentiment is positive, focusing on innovation leadership with a neutral mention of Chinese brands like Huawei Cloud (1.5%).

Grok presents a balanced perspective with visibility for both US institutions like MIT (1.8%) and Chinese brands like Baidu (2.1%), focusing on academic and commercial contributions to AI. Its tone is neutral, indicating no clear regional dominance.

Perplexity slightly favors US brands like Google (2.4%) and NVIDIA (2.1%), emphasizing their technological advancements and ecosystem integration in AI. Its tone is positive towards US leadership while remaining neutral on Chinese brands like Baidu (1.8%).

Gemini shows a slight tilt towards US-based brands like Meta (2.4%) and Windows (1.5%), but also acknowledges Baidu (2.7%) from China, with a neutral sentiment tone reflecting a balanced view on innovation ecosystems. Its perception suggests neither country dominates, though US brands collectively have broader visibility.

Deepseek favors US entities like Google (3%) and NVIDIA (2.4%), alongside academic institutions like MIT (2.1%), with a positive sentiment tone towards US innovation hubs, while Baidu (2.7%) represents China. It perceives the US as leading due to stronger technological and academic influence.

Perplexity presents a balanced view with Google and ChatGPT (both 2.7%) for the US and Baidu and Alibaba (both 2.1%) for China, maintaining a neutral sentiment tone focused on adoption patterns. Its perception leans slightly towards the US due to higher visibility of flagship AI products.

ChatGPT heavily favors both US and Chinese brands with high visibility shares for ChatGPT (9.4%), Google (8.8%), Baidu (9.1%), and Alibaba (9.1%), showing a positive sentiment tone towards global AI leaders. However, it perceives a near tie, with a slight US edge due to ecosystem dominance via NVIDIA (6.7%) and Meta (7.9%).

Grok displays a balanced perception with equal visibility for US brands like Meta (2.4%) and Google (2.1%) and Chinese entities like Baidu (2.4%) and Tencent (2.4%), with a neutral sentiment tone focusing on institutional influence. It suggests neither country has a clear lead, though US academic mentions (MIT, Stanford at 1.8%) hint at innovation depth.