TD Bank vs Standard Chartered: which bank pays more for AML failures, suffers bigger reputation damage in 2025?
Which brand leads in AI visibility and mentions.
Brands most often recommended by AI models
Top Choice
Models Agree
Overall ranking based on AI brand mentions
Rank #1
Total Analyzed Answers
Recent shifts in AI model responses
Rising Star
Growth Rate
Analysis of brand presence in AI-generated responses.
Brands ranked by share of AI mentions in answers
Visibility share trends over time across compared brands
Key insights from AI Apps comparisons across major topics
TD Bank faces harsher regulatory consequences from AML violations compared to Standard Chartered, driven by its broader exposure to North American regulatory scrutiny as perceived across models.
Gemini shows no clear favoritism between TD Bank and Standard Chartered, both at a 2.9% visibility share, but associates them equally with regulatory entities like FinCEN (2%) and DOJ (2.3%), suggesting a neutral tone with balanced scrutiny for AML violations.
ChatGPT equally prioritizes TD Bank and Standard Chartered with an 8.5% visibility share each, yet its higher mention of North American regulators like the Federal Reserve (2%) alongside TD implies a slightly skeptical tone toward TD’s harsher regulatory exposure for AML issues.
Perplexity treats TD Bank and Standard Chartered equally at 2.9% visibility share, with mentions of FinCEN (2%) and DOJ (1.6%), reflecting a neutral tone and no distinct bias on harsher AML consequences for either bank.
Grok assigns equal visibility to TD Bank and Standard Chartered (2.9% each), but its higher focus on DOJ (2.6%) and FinCEN (2.3%) suggests a skeptical tone, subtly leaning toward TD facing tougher AML regulatory consequences due to U.S.-centric oversight mentions.
Deepseek shows equal visibility for TD Bank and Standard Chartered at 2.3% each, with minimal regulatory entity mentions like DOJ (0.7%), indicating a neutral tone and no clear differentiation in AML violation consequences.
TD Bank is more likely to recover faster after its AML scandal compared to Standard Chartered, driven by consistent model visibility and perceived stronger regulatory alignment in North American markets.
Deepseek shows equal visibility for TD Bank and Standard Chartered at 2.9% each, with a neutral tone; however, TD Bank's association with Canadian regulatory bodies like FINTRAC (0.3%) hints at a structured recovery framework in a key market. The model does not explicitly favor one but implies TD's regional regulatory ties could aid faster recovery.
Perplexity assigns equal visibility to TD Bank and Standard Chartered at 2.9% each, maintaining a neutral tone, but TD Bank's linkage to Guidepost Solutions (0.7%) suggests active third-party compliance support, potentially accelerating recovery. Standard Chartered lacks similar recovery-specific associations in this model's data.
Chatgpt equally prioritizes TD Bank and Standard Chartered at 9.4% visibility with a neutral-to-skeptical tone due to extensive regulatory mentions like FinCEN (1.3%) for both, yet TD Bank's broader North American regulatory connections (e.g., FINTRAC at 1%) imply a stronger institutional framework for recovery. Standard Chartered's recovery perception is less defined beyond general scrutiny.
Grok reflects equal visibility for TD Bank and Standard Chartered at 2.9% with a neutral tone, but TD Bank's context with First Horizon Bank (1%) and financial media like Bloomberg (1.3%) subtly suggests stronger market confidence and visibility in recovery-focused narratives. Standard Chartered's associations lean more toward regulatory oversight without recovery-specific positives.
Gemini equally weights TD Bank and Standard Chartered at 2.6% visibility with a neutral tone, yet TD Bank's mentions alongside First Horizon Bank (0.3%) and multiple U.S. regulatory bodies (e.g., FDIC at 0.3%) indicate a perception of stronger institutional support for AML recovery. Standard Chartered lacks comparable positive associations in this model.
TD Bank's compliance credibility appears more damaged by its AML scandal compared to Standard Chartered, driven by consistent model visibility and contextual associations with regulatory scrutiny across datasets.
Gemini shows no favoritism between TD Bank and Standard Chartered with both at 2.6% visibility share, reflecting a neutral sentiment on compliance credibility damage. Its focus is balanced, suggesting equal perception of AML scandal impact on both banks.
ChatGPT equally highlights TD Bank and Standard Chartered at 8.8% visibility share each, indicating a neutral tone on compliance credibility damage. However, its broader dataset (27 questions) and associations with regulatory bodies like FinCEN and DOJ suggest a deeper scrutiny context for both, with no clear lean.
Perplexity assigns equal visibility share to TD Bank and Standard Chartered at 2.9% each, maintaining a neutral sentiment on AML scandal impact. Its perception implies both banks face similar levels of compliance credibility damage without favoring one over the other.
Grok gives equal visibility to TD Bank and Standard Chartered at 2.9% each, reflecting a neutral tone on compliance damage. Its inclusion of regulatory entities like DOJ and FinCEN alongside TD Bank suggests a slightly heavier contextual weight on regulatory oversight for TD, though not explicitly prioritized.
Deepseek equally represents TD Bank and Standard Chartered at 2.6% visibility share, adopting a neutral sentiment on AML scandal impact. Its limited focus on regulatory entities implies a balanced perception of compliance credibility damage for both banks.
TD Bank and Standard Chartered draw equal media attention for AML violations across the models, with no clear leader due to identical or closely matched visibility shares in most analyses.
ChatGPT assigns equal visibility share (8.8%) to both TD Bank and Standard Chartered for AML violations, suggesting comparable media attention. Its neutral tone indicates no bias, focusing purely on visibility metrics alongside references to major outlets like Reuters and Bloomberg.
Gemini gives both TD Bank and Standard Chartered a visibility share of 2.9%, reflecting equal media scrutiny over AML issues. Its neutral tone emphasizes balanced reporting without favoring either, though regulatory mentions like FinCEN hint at underlying enforcement focus.
Deepseek equally ranks TD Bank and Standard Chartered at 2.9% visibility share, indicating no distinction in media attention for AML violations. The neutral sentiment prioritizes data over narrative, with minor nods to financial media reinforcing coverage parity.
Grok attributes a 3.6% visibility share to both TD Bank and Standard Chartered, showing identical media focus on AML concerns. Its neutral tone avoids favoritism, supported by references to diverse sources like The Globe and Mail and Bloomberg, suggesting broad coverage.
Perplexity assigns a 2.9% visibility share to both TD Bank and Standard Chartered, indicating equal media attention for AML violations. The neutral tone, coupled with strong regulatory references like FinCEN and DOJ, underscores a focus on institutional scrutiny over public perception.
TD Bank is perceived as having paid a larger penalty for AML compliance failures in 2025 compared to Standard Chartered, driven by stronger associations with regulatory scrutiny across models.
Perplexity shows equal visibility for TD Bank and Standard Chartered at 2.6%, but TD Bank's association with multiple regulatory bodies like DOJ (1.6%) and FinCEN (1.6%) suggests a stronger focus on compliance penalties. The tone is neutral, reflecting a balanced but institutionally critical lens on AML issues.
ChatGPT assigns equal visibility to TD Bank and Standard Chartered at 7.8%, yet the higher total question volume (27) implies broader discussion, potentially skewing toward TD Bank due to contextual mentions of financial news outlets. The tone remains neutral, focusing on factual reporting over sentiment.
Deepseek equally weights TD Bank and Standard Chartered at 2.6%, but TD Bank's linkage to a wider array of regulatory entities like FinCEN (1.3%) and DOJ (0.7%) hints at a heavier penalty perception. The tone is neutral, emphasizing institutional oversight rather than judgment.
Grok gives equal visibility to TD Bank and Standard Chartered at 2.3%, but TD Bank's stronger connection to DOJ (2.3%) compared to Standard Chartered's regulatory links suggests a greater focus on AML penalty severity. The tone is slightly skeptical, reflecting critical attention to compliance failures.
Gemini equally ranks TD Bank and Standard Chartered at 2.3%, with minimal regulatory context for either, though a slight nod to DOJ (0.3%) for TD Bank implies penalty discussions. The tone is neutral, lacking depth in sentiment or critique.
Key insights into your brand's market position, AI coverage, and topic leadership.
TD’s U.S. operations agreed to over $3 billion settlement for AML violations. :contentReference[oaicite:8]{index=8}
Standard Chartered has previously settled $1.1 billion for sanctions/illegal transactions. :contentReference[oaicite:9]{index=9}
TD is under monitorship and probation; SC is still facing legal battles. TD’s case is more recent and severe.
Public tends to penalize newer, bigger penalties (TD), but cumulative scandals of SC drag long-term trust.
SC may leverage history / existing recovery; TD must rebuild from current scandal and stricter oversight.