ChatGPT vs Gemini
ChatGPT vs Gemini comparison: Google's AI vs OpenAI's chatbot. Which is better for search, coding, and productivity in 2025?
Key Findings
Which brand leads in AI visibility and mentions.
Google dominates over ChatGPT in AI visibility rankings
AI Recommendation
Brands most often recommended by AI models
Top Choice
5/5
Models Agree
Popularity Ranking
Overall ranking based on AI brand mentions
Rank #1
146/147
Total Analyzed Answers
Trending Mentions
Recent shifts in AI model responses
-
Rising Star
-%
Growth Rate
Brand Visibility
Analysis of brand presence in AI-generated responses.
AI Visibility Share Rankings
Brands ranked by share of AI mentions in answers
AI Visibility Share Over Time
Visibility share trends over time across compared brands
Topics Compared
Key insights from AI Apps comparisons across major topics
"Should I use ChatGPT or Gemini for work?"
ChatGPT slightly edges out Gemini for work-related use due to its higher visibility and perceived relevance across most models, signaling stronger user confidence in its utility and integration.
Perplexity shows no clear favoritism between ChatGPT and Gemini, with both receiving equal visibility share (2.7%) for Google (associated with Gemini) and ChatGPT. Its neutral sentiment suggests neither is prioritized for work applications.
ChatGPT exhibits a slight self-bias with a higher visibility share of 9.5% compared to Google (9%) and Google AI (2.7%), indicating a positive sentiment toward itself for work-related contexts, likely due to perceived versatility.
Deepseek remains neutral, assigning equal visibility (2.7%) to both ChatGPT and Google, with no strong preference for work use, reflecting a balanced sentiment without clear differentiation in utility.
Grok treats ChatGPT and Google equally with a 2.7% visibility share each, showing a neutral tone and no distinct leaning toward either for professional tasks, focusing instead on broad applicability.
Gemini shows a balanced view with equal visibility (2.7%) for ChatGPT and Google, and a smaller share for Google AI (0.9%), suggesting a neutral sentiment and no strong advocacy for itself in a work context.
"What's the best free AI chatbot in 2025?"
Google and ChatGPT emerge as the leading free AI chatbots for 2025 based on visibility and consistent positive sentiment across models, reflecting their strong user recognition and perceived innovation.
Deepseek shows a balanced favorability towards Windows, Google, and ChatGPT, each with a 2.7% visibility share, likely due to their widespread recognition and ecosystem integration. Its tone is neutral, focusing on visibility without explicit critique or endorsement.
ChatGPT favors Google (8.6%) and itself (8.1%) as top free AI chatbots, emphasizing their accessibility and adoption among users. The tone is positive, reflecting confidence in these brands’ capabilities and market presence.
Gemini equally favors Google and ChatGPT at 2.7% visibility share, likely valuing their innovation and user experience in the chatbot space. Its tone is neutral to positive, indicating appreciation without strong bias.
Perplexity highlights Google and ChatGPT equally at 2.7% visibility, suggesting a preference for their established presence and technological reliability in free AI chatbot offerings. The tone remains neutral, focusing on factual visibility metrics.
Grok leans towards Google and Anthropic, both at 2.7% visibility, possibly due to their perceived innovation and community sentiment in the AI space. The tone is neutral, presenting data without strong emotional bias.
"Which AI gives the most up-to-date information?"
Perplexity and ChatGPT stand out as the AI models likely to provide the most up-to-date information due to their higher visibility shares and broader brand engagement, with ChatGPT having a slight edge due to its extensive interaction data across multiple platforms.
ChatGPT favors no single brand overwhelmingly but shows high visibility for Google, Bing, and itself at 9.5% each, suggesting a broad data pool that likely includes the latest trends and updates. Its neutral tone and extensive question base (21 questions) indicate a comprehensive and current understanding of various platforms.
Gemini equally favors Google and ChatGPT at 2.7% visibility share, reflecting a balanced but limited focus on platforms with real-time data, suggesting moderate recency in information. Its neutral tone and smaller question set (6 questions) imply less depth in capturing the latest updates compared to others.
Deepseek shows equal visibility (2.7%) for multiple brands like Google, ChatGPT, and Perplexity, indicating a disperse focus without strong emphasis on any single source for up-to-date data. Its neutral tone and limited question base (6 questions) suggest it may not prioritize the most current information.
Grok distributes visibility evenly (2.7%) across major brands like Google, ChatGPT, and Perplexity, with a slight nod to real-time platforms like X (1.4%), hinting at potential for current data access. Its neutral tone and smaller dataset (6 questions) limit its ability to reflect the latest information comprehensively.
Perplexity equally favors ChatGPT and Anthropic at 2.7% visibility, with a focus on platforms like Google (2.3%) that often prioritize fresh content, suggesting a strong inclination toward up-to-date information. Its positive tone and focus on diverse, innovative ecosystems indicate a keen awareness of current developments despite a smaller question set (6 questions).
"Which AI works best with Google Workspace and Gmail?"
Google and its associated tools are the leading choice for integration with Google Workspace and Gmail across most AI models due to their native compatibility and high visibility in relevant contexts.
ChatGPT shows a notable favor toward Google (9.5% visibility share) and Gmail (6.3% visibility share), likely due to their inherent ecosystem integration and widespread use in productivity contexts. Its sentiment tone is positive, emphasizing Google's dominance in workspace tools.
Perplexity leans toward Google (2.3% visibility share) and Gmail (1.8% visibility share) as key players, with additional focus on niche tools like Google AI (1.4%) for workspace integration, reflecting a positive sentiment for Google’s ecosystem compatibility.
DeepSeek equally favors Google (2.7% visibility share) and Zapier (2.7% visibility share), suggesting a balance between native Google Workspace integration and third-party automation tools; its tone is neutral, focusing on functional compatibility.
Gemini highlights Google (2.7% visibility share) and Gmail (2.7% visibility share) as central to workspace integration, with a positive sentiment that underscores user accessibility and native tool synergy within Google’s ecosystem.
Grok prioritizes Google (2.7% visibility share) and Zapier (2.7% visibility share), indicating a preference for both native integration and third-party solutions for Gmail and Workspace; its tone is neutral, focusing on practical utility over brand loyalty.
"Which AI is better for Google Docs and Sheets?"
Google emerges as the leading brand for integration with Google Docs and Sheets across the AI models, driven by its high visibility share and ecosystem relevance.
ChatGPT shows a clear preference for Google with a 9.5% visibility share, significantly higher than other brands, suggesting strong recognition for its compatibility or integration with Google Docs and Sheets. Its tone is positive toward Google, likely due to perceived ecosystem synergy, though it also mentions GPT for Sheets and Docs at 0.5%, indicating niche awareness.
Deepseek exhibits a neutral tone with no strong favoritism, giving Google a modest 2.7% visibility share, slightly above ChatGPT and Grammarly at 2.3% each. Its perception seems to balance multiple tools without a specific focus on Google Docs and Sheets compatibility.
Grok assigns equal visibility share of 2.7% to both Google and Windows, reflecting a neutral tone without clear preference for Google’s tools in the context of Docs and Sheets. Its focus appears fragmented, lacking specific emphasis on integration or usability for Google’s ecosystem.
Gemini leans toward Google with a 2.3% visibility share, outpacing ChatGPT at 1.8%, and maintains a positive tone likely due to Google’s native AI integration potential with Docs and Sheets. It perceives Google as relevant but does not strongly differentiate on specific features.
Perplexity favors Google and ChatGPT equally at 2.7% visibility share, with a positive tone toward Google’s relevance for Docs and Sheets, reinforced by mentions of Google AI at 0.5%. It also highlights niche tools like Numerous.ai, suggesting awareness of specialized integrations for Sheets.
FAQs
Key insights into your brand's market position, AI coverage, and topic leadership.
Which is better, ChatGPT or Gemini?
It depends on your ecosystem preference. ChatGPT is better if you use multiple platforms and want flexibility with third-party plugins and integrations. It works seamlessly across devices and has a massive community building tools around it. Gemini is the clear winner if you're deep into the Google ecosystem - it connects directly with Gmail, Google Docs, Google Drive, and Google Search without any setup. For example, Gemini can read your emails, summarize documents in your Drive, and pull real-time information from Google Search all in one conversation. If you already use Google Workspace for work, Gemini's native integration saves tons of time.
Is Gemini more accurate than ChatGPT?
Gemini Ultra (Google's top model) matches GPT-4 in accuracy for most tasks, with some advantages in specific areas. Gemini particularly excels when questions require current information because it can search Google in real-time. For example, if you ask about recent news, stock prices, or current events, Gemini will give you up-to-date answers while ChatGPT's free version is limited to older training data. For creative writing, code generation, and general knowledge, both are very accurate. The key difference is Gemini's real-time access to information makes it more reliable for anything time-sensitive.
Which AI has better Google integration?
Gemini wins this hands down because it's made by Google. It connects natively with every Google service - Gmail, Calendar, Docs, Sheets, Drive, Maps, and YouTube. You can ask Gemini to 'find emails from my boss last week about the project' or 'summarize this Google Doc' and it just works instantly. ChatGPT requires plugins and workarounds to access Google services, and even then it's clunky. If your work revolves around Google Workspace (which most businesses use), Gemini is significantly more powerful because it can read, edit, and organize your Google files without you having to copy-paste anything.
Is ChatGPT faster than Gemini?
Both respond in roughly the same time (2-4 seconds for most queries), so speed isn't a major differentiator. Where you might notice speed differences is in specific tasks: Gemini can be faster when your question requires web search because it has direct access to Google's search infrastructure. ChatGPT might feel faster for creative tasks or code generation because it doesn't spend time searching the web. The real-world experience is pretty similar - both are fast enough that you won't be waiting around. The difference is more about which one gives you the right answer in fewer follow-up questions.
Which AI is better for images and videos?
Gemini has significantly better multimodal capabilities, meaning it can understand and analyze images, videos, and audio more naturally. It was built from the ground up to work with multiple types of content simultaneously. For example, you can upload a video to Gemini and ask it to summarize what happens, identify objects, or even transcribe speech. ChatGPT can analyze images through DALL-E integration, but Gemini's native multimodal design makes it more powerful for working with visual content. If your work involves analyzing photos, videos, or creating visual content, Gemini is the stronger choice.
