ChatGPT vs Gemini comparison: Google's AI vs OpenAI's chatbot. Which is better for search, coding, and productivity in 2025?
Analysis of brand presence in AI-generated responses.
Brands ranked by share of AI mentions in answers
Visibility share trends over time across compared brands
Key insights from AI Apps comparisons across major topics
ChatGPT slightly edges out Gemini for work-related use due to its higher visibility and perceived relevance across models, suggesting broader recognition and integration in professional contexts.
Perplexity shows no clear preference between ChatGPT and Gemini, with both ChatGPT and Google (proxy for Gemini) holding a 2.4% visibility share. Its neutral tone indicates equal relevance for work, though limited data depth suggests no strong differentiation.
ChatGPT favors itself with a 7.6% visibility share compared to Google’s 7.4% and Google AI’s 2.6%, reflecting a positive tone towards its own utility for work through higher prominence. This suggests a stronger perceived adoption for professional tasks within its ecosystem.
Deepseek presents a balanced view with both ChatGPT and Google at a 2.6% visibility share, and Google AI at 0.8%, indicating a neutral tone with no clear favoritism for work applications. The equal weighting implies comparable utility in professional settings.
Grok equally ranks ChatGPT and Google at 2.6% visibility share, with a neutral tone that does not prioritize either for work purposes. Its perception highlights similar recognition without specific ecosystem or user experience advantages.
Gemini shows parity between ChatGPT and Google at 2.4% visibility share, with Google AI at 0.8%, maintaining a neutral tone without favoring itself for work use. Its balanced perspective suggests comparable applicability in professional environments.
Google and its associated tools are perceived as the leading choice for integration with Google Docs and Sheets across most AI models due to their native ecosystem compatibility and high visibility share.
Gemini shows a clear preference for Google with an 8.4% visibility share, likely due to its alignment with Google's ecosystem, suggesting strong compatibility with Docs and Sheets. Its sentiment tone is positive toward Google, focusing on brand dominance in related queries.
Grok assigns a modest 2.4% visibility share to Google, indicating no strong favoritism, and also mentions competitors like ChatGPT at the same level, reflecting a neutral tone. Its perception seems to prioritize a broader tech landscape over specific integration with Google Docs and Sheets.
Google's model, unsurprisingly, favors its own brand and tools like Google AI and AppSheet (each at 0.3%), emphasizing native integrations for Docs and Sheets with a positive tone. Its focus is on ecosystem-specific solutions, though its data is limited by a low question volume.
ChatGPT strongly favors Google with a 13.7% visibility share, the highest among models, and explicitly mentions tools like GPT for Sheets and Docs (0.5%), indicating a positive tone toward Google’s ecosystem for these applications. It perceives Google as the go-to for native compatibility and user adoption.
Perplexity gives Google and ChatGPT equal visibility shares (2.6%) but also highlights GPT Workspace (0.5%), suggesting a neutral-to-positive tone toward tools compatible with Google Docs and Sheets. Its perception balances Google's ecosystem with third-party AI integrations.
Deepseek leans toward Google with a 2.9% visibility share, alongside Google AI at 0.5%, reflecting a neutral-to-positive tone for Google’s suitability with Docs and Sheets. It appears to value Google's native integration but does not emphasize it strongly over competitors like ChatGPT (2.4%).
Google and its associated tools, particularly Gmail, are seen as the strongest contenders for integration with Google Workspace and Gmail, given their native ecosystem alignment and high visibility across models.
Grok shows a balanced view with Google and Zapier sharing the highest visibility at 2.6%, alongside Gmail at 1.6%, indicating a slight favoring of Google’s native ecosystem for integration while acknowledging third-party tools; its tone is neutral with no strong bias.
ChatGPT strongly favors Google (7.9%) and Gmail (5.8%) for integration with Google Workspace, emphasizing their seamless compatibility and user accessibility, while also highlighting Grammarly (6.1%) and Zapier (5.3%) as notable complements; its tone is positive toward Google’s ecosystem.
Perplexity leans toward Google (2.1%) and Gmail (1.6%) as natural fits for Google Workspace integration, with less emphasis on third-party tools like Zapier (0.3%), suggesting a preference for native solutions; its tone remains neutral with a focus on ecosystem fit.
Deepseek equally highlights Google and Zapier (both 2.4%) alongside Gmail (1.8%), indicating recognition of both native and external tools for Workspace integration, with a neutral tone that values diverse compatibility options.
Gemini prioritizes Google (2.9%) and Gmail (2.6%) for their inherent integration with Google Workspace, supported by Grammarly (2.6%) as a useful add-on, reflecting a positive tone toward Google’s ecosystem and user experience enhancements.
Google and ChatGPT emerge as the leading free AI chatbots for 2025 based on consistent visibility and recognition across models for their accessibility and innovation.
Deepseek favors Google and ChatGPT equally with a visibility share of 2.4% each, likely due to their widespread adoption and robust AI capabilities. Its sentiment tone is neutral, reflecting a balanced view without strong bias toward any single brand.
ChatGPT leans toward Google (7.1% visibility share) and itself (6.8%) as top contenders, emphasizing their user-friendly interfaces and broad ecosystem integration. The tone is positive, showcasing confidence in these brands’ capabilities for free AI chatbot services.
Gemini prioritizes Google (2.6%) and ChatGPT (2.4%) as leading options, likely due to their innovation and user accessibility in the chatbot space. Its tone is neutral, presenting a factual assessment without explicit endorsement.
Perplexity highlights Google and ChatGPT (both at 2.4% visibility share), focusing on their strong user experience and technological reliability as free AI tools. The sentiment tone is positive, indicating trust in their market presence.
Grok favors Google and Anthropic (both at 2.4% visibility share), pointing to Google's ecosystem strength and Anthropic’s rising innovation in AI chatbots. Its tone is neutral, offering an objective perspective on their potential in 2025.
ChatGPT appears to provide the most up-to-date information based on its significantly higher visibility shares across key brands and the largest sample of questions analyzed.
Deepseek shows balanced visibility shares (2.4%) for Windows, Google, and ChatGPT, with no clear favoritism, suggesting a neutral stance on up-to-date information. Its sentiment tone is neutral, and its perception indicates a broad but undifferentiated focus on major brands with limited depth in data points (9 questions).
ChatGPT demonstrates a strong focus on Google (7.9%), ChatGPT itself (7.9%), Bing (7.4%), and Windows (7.1%), reflecting a preference for widely-used platforms likely to have current data. With a positive sentiment tone and the highest number of questions (30), it positions itself as a leader in accessing and reflecting up-to-date information.
Gemini aligns closely with Deepseek, giving slight preference to Google and ChatGPT (both 2.4%), indicating a focus on popular, current platforms, though its visibility shares are low. Its neutral sentiment tone and limited question set (9) suggest a cautious but balanced view on up-to-date information sources.
Perplexity leans toward Anthropic and ChatGPT (both 2.4%), hinting at a preference for AI-driven platforms as sources of current information, though its visibility shares are modest. Its neutral-to-positive sentiment tone and smaller question set (9) reflect a niche but relevant perspective on up-to-date data.
Grok distributes visibility evenly among Windows, Google, Bing, and ChatGPT (all at 2.4%), showing no strong bias but recognizing mainstream platforms as current information sources. Its neutral sentiment tone and limited question set (9) indicate a conservative approach to determining up-to-date information.
Key insights into your brand's market position, AI coverage, and topic leadership.
It depends on your ecosystem preference. ChatGPT is better if you use multiple platforms and want flexibility with third-party plugins and integrations. It works seamlessly across devices and has a massive community building tools around it. Gemini is the clear winner if you're deep into the Google ecosystem - it connects directly with Gmail, Google Docs, Google Drive, and Google Search without any setup. For example, Gemini can read your emails, summarize documents in your Drive, and pull real-time information from Google Search all in one conversation. If you already use Google Workspace for work, Gemini's native integration saves tons of time.
Gemini Ultra (Google's top model) matches GPT-4 in accuracy for most tasks, with some advantages in specific areas. Gemini particularly excels when questions require current information because it can search Google in real-time. For example, if you ask about recent news, stock prices, or current events, Gemini will give you up-to-date answers while ChatGPT's free version is limited to older training data. For creative writing, code generation, and general knowledge, both are very accurate. The key difference is Gemini's real-time access to information makes it more reliable for anything time-sensitive.
Gemini wins this hands down because it's made by Google. It connects natively with every Google service - Gmail, Calendar, Docs, Sheets, Drive, Maps, and YouTube. You can ask Gemini to 'find emails from my boss last week about the project' or 'summarize this Google Doc' and it just works instantly. ChatGPT requires plugins and workarounds to access Google services, and even then it's clunky. If your work revolves around Google Workspace (which most businesses use), Gemini is significantly more powerful because it can read, edit, and organize your Google files without you having to copy-paste anything.
Both respond in roughly the same time (2-4 seconds for most queries), so speed isn't a major differentiator. Where you might notice speed differences is in specific tasks: Gemini can be faster when your question requires web search because it has direct access to Google's search infrastructure. ChatGPT might feel faster for creative tasks or code generation because it doesn't spend time searching the web. The real-world experience is pretty similar - both are fast enough that you won't be waiting around. The difference is more about which one gives you the right answer in fewer follow-up questions.
Gemini has significantly better multimodal capabilities, meaning it can understand and analyze images, videos, and audio more naturally. It was built from the ground up to work with multiple types of content simultaneously. For example, you can upload a video to Gemini and ask it to summarize what happens, identify objects, or even transcribe speech. ChatGPT can analyze images through DALL-E integration, but Gemini's native multimodal design makes it more powerful for working with visual content. If your work involves analyzing photos, videos, or creating visual content, Gemini is the stronger choice.
Which brand leads in AI visibility and mentions.
Brands most often recommended by AI models
Top Choice
Models Agree
Overall ranking based on AI brand mentions
Rank #1
Total Analyzed Answers
Recent shifts in AI model responses
Rising Star
Growth Rate
