Best AI Coding Assistants 2025

ChatGPT shows a slight preference for full IDE assistance with higher visibility for tools like Cursor (7%) and JetBrains (4.6%), which are associated with comprehensive development environments. Its sentiment tone is neutral-positive, reflecting a balanced view but emphasizing integrated solutions for productivity.

Deepseek appears neutral with no strong favoritism, giving comparable visibility to both standalone code completion tools like Tabnine (2.4%) and full IDE platforms like JetBrains (2.7%) and VS Code (2.7%). Its sentiment tone is neutral, focusing on versatility across user needs without clear bias.

Gemini leans toward full IDE assistance with higher visibility for Cursor (2.6%) and JetBrains (2.4%), suggesting a preference for tools offering deeper ecosystem support. Its sentiment tone is positive, valuing the comprehensive user experience these platforms provide.

Grok favors full IDE assistance, evident from higher visibility shares for Cursor (2.1%), JetBrains (2.1%), and VS Code (2.2%), which provide robust development environments over pure code completion tools. Its sentiment tone is positive, focusing on the practicality of integrated systems.

Perplexity slightly prefers full IDE assistance, with Cursor (2.6%) and JetBrains (2.6%) dominating visibility over standalone tools like Tabnine (1.8%). Its sentiment tone is neutral-positive, acknowledging the utility of broader assistance while recognizing niche use cases for code completion.

GitHub Copilot (under GitHub) has a visibility share of 2.7%, matching Cursor's share at 2.7%, indicating no clear preference, but GitHub's broader ecosystem association suggests a slight lean toward Copilot. Sentiment tone is neutral, focusing on visibility without explicit qualitative judgment.

GitHub Copilot (via GitHub) dominates with a 9.4% visibility share, while Cursor is not mentioned, signaling a strong preference for Copilot likely due to its integration with widely adopted tools like VS Code (also at 9.4%). Sentiment tone is positive toward Copilot, driven by high visibility and ecosystem relevance.

GitHub Copilot (under GitHub) and Cursor both share 2.7% visibility, showing no distinct favoritism, with focus split evenly across coding tools like VS Code. Sentiment tone is neutral, lacking deeper qualitative reasoning for either tool.

GitHub Copilot (via GitHub) edges out slightly with a 2.9% visibility share compared to Cursor's 2.7%, hinting at a marginal preference possibly tied to GitHub's established developer community. Sentiment tone is neutral to slightly positive for Copilot, reflecting subtle visibility dominance.

GitHub Copilot is explicitly mentioned with a 0.2% visibility share alongside GitHub at 2.7%, matching Cursor's 2.7%, but Copilot's direct reference may indicate a focused recognition over Cursor. Sentiment tone is neutral, with no strong qualitative bias toward either tool.

Gemini shows a slight preference for GitHub (2.7% visibility share) and Tabnine (2.4%) over others like Cursor (2.4%) and ChatGPT (2.1%), likely due to their established ecosystems and integration capabilities, with a neutral tone reflecting balanced recognition of multiple tools.

Deepseek favors GitHub (3% visibility share) and AWS (2.7%) for their robust developer ecosystems and scalability, presenting a positive tone towards tools with wide adoption and integration potential for better ROI.

Perplexity equally prioritizes GitHub, Tabnine, and Cursor (each at 2.9% visibility share), emphasizing their relevance in coding efficiency with a positive tone, suggesting strong user accessibility and productivity value.

ChatGPT strongly favors GitHub (10.1% visibility share) and Tabnine (9.8%) for their comprehensive features and community support, adopting a positive tone that highlights superior ROI through user adoption and ecosystem strength.

Grok leans towards GitHub, Tabnine, and ChatGPT (each at 2.9% visibility share), focusing on their innovation and utility in coding workflows, with a neutral-to-positive tone indicating balanced value for cost.

Google shows minimal engagement with AI coding assistants, with no clear favorite (all at 0.2% visibility share including GitHub and JetBrains), maintaining a neutral tone and limited relevance to ROI assessment due to low focus on specific tools.

GitHub dominates with an 8% visibility share, reflecting strong recognition and trust for developers at all levels. Its sentiment tone is positive, likely due to its comprehensive features and community support, making it ideal for both junior and senior developers.

GitHub leads with a 3% visibility share, though the model’s focus is narrower compared to others. The sentiment tone is neutral, emphasizing GitHub’s utility but lacking depth on accessibility for junior versus senior developers.

GitHub and AWS both hold a 2.7% visibility share, indicating balanced recognition, with a positive sentiment tone for tools supporting scalable development. The model perceives GitHub as versatile for both junior learning and senior complex projects.

GitHub stands out with a 2.4% visibility share, with a positive sentiment tone focused on its ecosystem integration, suitable for seniors, though VS Code (1.4%) may appeal more to juniors for accessibility. The model highlights GitHub’s robustness for all skill levels.

GitHub, VS Code, Tabnine, and Cursor each show strong visibility at around 1.9%, with a positive sentiment tone for user-friendly tools. The model suggests GitHub and VS Code cater well to both junior and senior developers due to their feature depth and ease of use.

Grok favors GitHub with a notable visibility share of 2.7%, suggesting a preference for its collaborative and versatile ecosystem across programming languages. Its tone is positive, emphasizing GitHub’s role as a central hub for developers, while also acknowledging JetBrains (2.4%) for specific language support.

Deepseek also leans towards GitHub (2.6%) alongside Tabnine (2.6%), reflecting a balanced view of collaborative platforms and AI-driven code assistance for diverse languages. Its tone is neutral, focusing on functionality across tools like AWS (2.2%) for cloud-integrated coding.

ChatGPT strongly favors GitHub (9.8%) and Tabnine (9.3%) as top tools, highlighting their robust support for multiple languages and integration with environments like VS Code (7%). Its tone is highly positive, emphasizing user adoption and ecosystem strength for coding versatility.

Perplexity prioritizes GitHub (3%) and Cursor (2.9%), indicating a focus on accessibility and modern coding workflows across languages. Its tone is positive, valuing community-driven platforms and editor integrations like VS Code (2.2%) and JetBrains (2.4%).

Gemini highlights GitHub (2.6%) as a key player, alongside VS Code (1.9%) and JetBrains (1.8%), focusing on their adaptability to languages like Python and TypeScript. Its tone is neutral, emphasizing practical utility over specific AI tool dominance.