Best AI Coding Assistants 2025

ChatGPT shows a stronger inclination towards full IDE assistance with higher visibility for tools like Cursor (6.6%) and JetBrains (4.5%), suggesting a preference for comprehensive development environments over standalone code completion tools like Copilot (0.1%). Its tone is positive, emphasizing robust ecosystem integration.

Deepseek appears neutral, with balanced visibility for both code completion tools like Tabnine (2.5%) and full IDE solutions like JetBrains (2.8%) and VS Code (2.8%), indicating no clear preference but acknowledging the utility of both approaches.

Gemini leans towards full IDE assistance, giving notable visibility to Cursor (2.5%) and JetBrains (2.4%) over narrower tools like Amazon CodeWhisperer (0.1%), with a positive tone highlighting user experience and broader functionality.

Grok demonstrates a slight favor for full IDE assistance, with comparable visibility for VS Code (2.2%) and JetBrains (2.1%) against code completion tools like Tabnine (1.9%), maintaining a neutral-to-positive tone focused on practical developer needs.

Perplexity tilts towards full IDE assistance, prioritizing JetBrains (2.7%) and Cursor (2.5%) over standalone completion tools like Tabnine (1.9%), with a positive tone centered on adoption patterns and ecosystem support.

Google's data is inconclusive due to minimal visibility shares (0.1% across all brands) and low question volume, showing a neutral tone with no discernible preference for either code completion or full IDE assistance.

Gemini shows equal visibility for GitHub (2.7%) and Cursor (2.7%), indicating a neutral stance with no explicit favor. Its sentiment tone is neutral, focusing on balanced representation in developer tools without deeper reasoning for preference.

ChatGPT exhibits a strong bias toward GitHub (9% visibility) with no mention of Cursor, suggesting a preference for GitHub Copilot due to its established presence in coding ecosystems. The sentiment tone is positive for GitHub, emphasizing its adoption among developers.

Grok assigns equal visibility to both GitHub (2.7%) and Cursor (2.7%), reflecting a neutral perception without favoring one over the other. Its sentiment tone is neutral, lacking specific reasoning to differentiate their utility or user experience.

Perplexity slightly favors GitHub (3.1%) over Cursor (2.7%) in visibility, indicating a mild preference for GitHub Copilot due to its wider recognition in coding communities. The sentiment tone is neutral to slightly positive for GitHub, with no critical insights on Cursor.

Deepseek gives equal visibility to GitHub (2.7%) and Cursor (2.7%), but also mentions 'Copilot' explicitly (0.1%), hinting at a marginal lean toward GitHub Copilot due to direct association. The sentiment tone is neutral to slightly positive for GitHub Copilot, lacking critical evaluation of Cursor.

Google shows minimal visibility for GitHub (0.1%) and no mention of Cursor, suggesting a weak, contextually irrelevant perception of both in relation to the question. The sentiment tone is neutral, with no meaningful data to assess preference for either tool.

GitHub Copilot holds the highest visibility share at 2.8%, suggesting a slight favor for its recognition and adoption among developers for coding assistance. The tone is neutral, focusing on visibility without explicit value judgment.

GitHub Copilot again leads with a 3.1% visibility share, indicating strong recognition as a coding assistant, likely due to its integration and user base; sentiment remains neutral with an emphasis on presence over direct ROI assessment.

GitHub Copilot and Tabnine tie at 3.1% visibility share, with a neutral tone reflecting equal recognition, though the model does not delve into specific ROI benefits, focusing purely on exposure metrics.

GitHub Copilot dominates with a 9.6% visibility share, far surpassing others, indicating a strong positive sentiment for its perceived effectiveness and integration in coding environments, directly correlating to better ROI for the price.

GitHub Copilot leads with a 3.0% visibility share, with a neutral-to-positive tone suggesting reliability and community adoption, though ROI is indirectly inferred through visibility rather than explicit cost-value analysis.

GitHub Copilot ties with others at a low 0.3% visibility share, reflecting a neutral-to-skeptical tone due to limited data and focus, with no clear indication of ROI or preference for any specific coding assistant.

ChatGPT strongly favors GitHub with a 7.6% visibility share, highlighting its robust community and extensive resources ideal for juniors needing guidance and seniors seeking collaboration. Its tone is positive, emphasizing GitHub’s versatility alongside tools like Tabnine (7.3%) for code completion.

Perplexity also prioritizes GitHub with a 3.3% visibility share, focusing on its broad accessibility for all skill levels, though its limited dataset suggests a cautious, neutral tone. It overlooks specialized tools, indicating a focus on mainstream platforms for general use.

Deepseek leans toward GitHub and Tabnine equally (both at 2.7%), valuing GitHub for its ecosystem suitable for seniors and Tabnine for AI-driven assistance beneficial to juniors, with a positive tone. It balances community-driven and AI-powered tools as complementary.

Gemini favors GitHub (2.4%) for its collaborative features appealing to seniors, while noting VS Code (1.5%) for its lightweight usability for juniors, with a neutral-to-positive tone. Its focus is on practical integration within coding environments.

Grok highlights GitHub, VS Code, Tabnine, and Cursor (each around 1.9%) with a positive tone, praising GitHub and VS Code for user-friendly interfaces for juniors and AI tools like Tabnine for seniors’ productivity. It emphasizes a diverse toolset accommodating varied experience levels.

Google shows minimal engagement with a 0.1% visibility share for GitHub and others, adopting a neutral-to-skeptical tone due to limited data. Its perception lacks depth, offering little insight into preferences for junior or senior developers.

Grok favors GitHub with a visibility share of 2.7%, highlighting its broad utility across multiple programming languages, supported by a positive sentiment tone emphasizing its ecosystem strength. Its focus on tools like JetBrains (2.4%) also suggests a preference for robust development environments.

Deepseek prioritizes GitHub (2.5%) and Tabnine (2.5%) equally, with a neutral sentiment tone indicating balanced utility for various coding needs. It perceives GitHub as a versatile platform and Tabnine as a strong AI coding assistant across languages.

ChatGPT strongly favors GitHub (9.3%) and Tabnine (8.8%), with a positive sentiment tone rooted in their widespread adoption and user-friendly interfaces for diverse programming languages. It also highlights VS Code (6.7%) as a key tool, underscoring accessibility and integration.

Perplexity leans toward GitHub (3.3%) with a positive sentiment tone, citing its community support and applicability across programming languages. Cursor (2.8%) also gains attention for its emerging role in AI-assisted coding environments.

Gemini supports GitHub (2.5%) as a leading tool with a neutral-to-positive sentiment tone, focusing on its compatibility with multiple languages and strong community ecosystem. It also notes VS Code (1.8%) as a user-friendly option for diverse coding tasks.

Google shows no clear favorite due to a uniform low visibility share (0.1%) across all tools, including GitHub, with a neutral sentiment tone. Its limited data suggests a lack of strong bias or deep insight into specific language support.