JPMorgan vs Goldman Sachs

ChatGPT shows equal visibility share (5.8%) for Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan Chase, suggesting comparable recognition for loyalty among clients and investors, with a neutral sentiment tone. Its broader mention of multiple banks indicates no strong favoritism, focusing on general market presence over specific loyalty drivers.

Gemini equally represents Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan Chase with a 1.9% visibility share, reflecting a neutral sentiment and no distinct preference for loyalty among clients or investors. The limited scope of data suggests a balanced perception without deep insights into loyalty factors.

Deepseek slightly favors JPMorgan (1.9% visibility share, under 'JPMorgan' and 'Chase') over other banks, with a neutral-to-positive sentiment tone, hinting at stronger recognition for client and investor loyalty. Its diverse brand mentions suggest a focus on innovation and accessibility, with JPMorgan maintaining consistent visibility.

Perplexity shows no favoritism between Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan Chase, assigning both a 3.8% visibility share, reflecting a neutral tone and balanced perception of their AI presence in 2025.

Gemini equally ranks Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan Chase at 3.8% visibility share each, maintaining a neutral tone and indicating comparable AI relevance for both banks in 2025.

ChatGPT favors Goldman Sachs with an 11.5% visibility share over JPMorgan Chase at 9.6%, suggesting a positive tone toward Goldman’s AI initiatives and a stronger perceived innovation focus for 2025.

Grok assigns equal visibility shares of 5.8% to both Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan Chase, adopting a neutral tone and perceiving both as equally prominent in AI visibility for 2025.

Deepseek treats Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan Chase equally with 1.9% visibility share each, maintaining a neutral tone and showing no distinct preference in AI visibility for 2025.

JPMorgan Chase and Wells Fargo share the highest visibility at 3.8%, suggesting greater media focus on their scandals or events compared to others like Goldman Sachs at 1.9%. The tone is neutral, reflecting a data-driven allocation of attention without evident bias.

JPMorgan Chase, Goldman Sachs, Barclays, Deutsche Bank, and HSBC each hold a 3.8% visibility share, indicating a broad spread of media attention, though no single bank dominates. The tone remains neutral, focusing on equal distribution of coverage across major players in financial controversies.

JPMorgan Chase and Deutsche Bank lead with a 9.6% visibility share each, pointing to significant media scrutiny of their involvement in financial scandals or regulatory events. The tone is neutral to slightly skeptical, as the model highlights extensive coverage which may imply negative contexts.

JPMorgan Chase, Goldman Sachs, HSBC, and Wells Fargo each have a 3.8% visibility share, suggesting balanced media attention on their roles in notable events or scandals. The tone is neutral, prioritizing factual visibility over judgmental sentiment.

JPMorgan Chase ties with other banks like Goldman Sachs and HSBC at a 1.9% visibility share, showing no clear standout in media attention for scandals or events. The tone is neutral, with equal weight given to all listed entities without critical emphasis.

Gemini favors JPMorgan Chase and Goldman Sachs equally with a 3.8% visibility share, suggesting a perception of resilience tied to their strong market presence and institutional backing during economic downturns. Its sentiment tone is neutral, focusing on balanced visibility without explicit critique or praise.

Grok highlights JPMorgan Chase, RBC, Citi, HSBC, BoA, and Wells Fargo with equal visibility shares of 3.8%, indicating a perception of resilience through diversified operations and global reach as buffers against downturns. The sentiment tone is positive, reflecting confidence in these banks’ stability based on their prominence.

ChatGPT strongly favors JPMorgan Chase with a 9.6% visibility share, far ahead of Goldman Sachs at 7.7%, implying superior resilience through perceived financial robustness and crisis management capabilities in downturns. The sentiment tone is positive, emphasizing institutional trust and dominance in discussions.

Perplexity views JPMorgan Chase, Goldman Sachs, BoA, and the Federal Reserve equally at 3.8% visibility, suggesting resilience tied to systemic importance and access to regulatory support during downturns. The sentiment tone is neutral, focusing on structural stability without overt bias.

ChatGPT favors JPMorgan Chase, Citi, and BoA, each with an 11.5% visibility share, suggesting a strong perception of their holistic retail and investment services through broad market presence. The sentiment tone is positive, reflecting confidence in these brands’ comprehensive offerings over competitors like Credit Suisse (1.9%).

Perplexity shows a more fragmented view with BoA mentioned alongside smaller players like Charles Schwab and Ally Bank, each at 1.9% visibility share, indicating no clear favorite but a neutral tone toward BoA’s capability in holistic services. Its focus seems to lean slightly toward retail accessibility rather than investment dominance.